were they on drugs when they booked Mark Kerr vs Greg Stott?

The way Stott moved was fucking priceless.

 
Prime Kerr = destroyer of worlds
Kerr-flexing.gif

No Prime Kerr = a roided out drug addict that used an artificial strength advantage to beat out a bunch of guys who may have beaten him if he was natural.
 
No Prime Kerr = a roided out drug addict that used an artificial strength advantage to beat out a bunch of guys who may have beaten him if he was natural.

yeah fucking right. kerr wasn't clean but to say he had no skills other than taking roids is absolutely retarded.

dude was an MMA pioneer.
 
kerr was a great fighter and a key figure in the early, my preferred, era of mma, who was a powerful wrestler and because of his strength and skill and likely juice induced performance was never too tested in his early fights by someone who could neutralize his takedowns... stott was an army ranger, and at least he probably went into the fight clean.

also, stott apparently was/is a bodybuilder.

Nobody was clean back then. It was a level playing field because everybody was juicing.

Just like when people shit on Coleman winning the PRIDE GP because he was "probably juiced up", yeah just like everybody was.
 
true, i dont judge him for it either, just saying because it is most likely true, although the guy did eat that knee fairly well, he was somewhat conscious, could have harvested horses with knees like tha
 
How would Stott have done against this Mark Kerr?

[YT]7lqqUhpywYM[/YT]
 
The ADCC changed their rules and point structure purely because of Mark Kerr, haha.
What were the changes?

Kerr's match with Arona is.. interesting, to say the least. Though, one can't help but notice that Kerr is visibly fat. Gotta wonder if he really was totally spent by 2003. Fuck painkillers.
 
Back
Top