Movies Welcome to Fright Night: the annual Sherdog Horror Movie Festival.

10/19: The Torture Chamber of Dr. Sadism (1967)

"A resurrected count who killed 12 virgins for immortality hunts the daughter of his 13th intended victim and the son of the prosecutor who condemned him, seeking vengeance."

A movie worth seeing if you are a Christopher Lee completist, or if you're a fan of the gothic films of this era.

5.8/10
 
This suggestion is for those of you who like found footage horror movies (i.e. Blair Witch Project). It's not for everyone but I love the genre.

Butterfly Kisses (2018) is an amazing Indie horror movie in this genre
I love found footage. Might check it out.
 
Going to Pennhurst's annual haunted asylum tonight with some friends and a bunch of volleyball hunnies, so I got a movie in early after cutting the grass...

10/1 - Phantasm
10/2 - The VVitch + 28 Years Later
10/3 - I, Madman
10/4 - The Incubus + World Word Z
10/5 - Bring Her Back
10/6 - Train to Busan + Color Out of Space
10/7 - 976-EVIL + Pumpkinhead
10/8 - The Brood
10/9 - Vamp + Gothic + Silver Bullet + The Lost Boys
10/10 - The Thing (2011) + John Carpenter's The Thing
10/11 - The Night Eats the World
10/12 - IT (2017) + Gremlins
10/13 - Halloween III: Season of the Witch + Friday the 13th Part III
10/14 - The Substance
10/15 - Talk to Me
10/16 - The Dead Don't Die
10/17 - Hereditary
10/18 - Death Screams

Death Screams is a slasher flick from '82, trying to cash in on the slasher frenzy of the day, but falls way short.

The kills weren't all that inspired, needed more tits and ass although the few and far between scenes were alright, and it was very derivative.

Ramona, the sluttiest of the girls, was a babe though and her tits were fantastic.

A forgettable slasher when all was said and done.
Death Screams - just watched. Pretty bad lol but agreed on Ramona some of the other chick's were hot too.

Follows the standard 80s slasher formula. Bad acting, cheesy, actors playing characters much younger than them and that really annoying person you can't wait to be killed. (More than 1 in this movie) Still enjoyed it for the 80s nostalgia. Times has sure changed, can't imagine a carnival where a girl about 20 is selling kisses and then kisses a boy about 12 on the mouth lol.

I give it a 4.5 / 10.
 
By the way for anyone that doesn't have Tubi its free and a goldmine for 80s horror movies. You have to put with ads ofc but well worth it.

Currently has House, Chopping Mall, Sorority House Massacre, Prom Night 1 and 2, Cutting Class, The Boogeyman, One Dark Night, Butcher Baker Nightmare Maker, The Incubus, Without Warning, The Exterminator and Puppet Master etc.
 
By the way for anyone that doesn't have Tubi its free and a goldmine for 80s horror movies. You have to put with ads ofc but well worth it.

Currently has House, Chopping Mall, Sorority House Massacre, Prom Night 1 and 2, Cutting Class, The Boogeyman, One Dark Night, Butcher Baker Nightmare Maker, The Incubus, Without Warning, The Exterminator and Puppet Master etc.

I wouldn't be able to do this every year without Tubi. It is a horror gold-mine and I love that they have it separated out into decades if you go into the categories section.
 
By the way for anyone that doesn't have Tubi its free and a goldmine for 80s horror movies. You have to put with ads ofc but well worth it.

Currently has House, Chopping Mall, Sorority House Massacre, Prom Night 1 and 2, Cutting Class, The Boogeyman, One Dark Night, Butcher Baker Nightmare Maker, The Incubus, Without Warning, The Exterminator and Puppet Master etc.
Quick questions. Are the movies unedited, commercials aside? Do they have english captions/subtitles?
 
10/1 - Phantasm
10/2 - The VVitch + 28 Years Later
10/3 - I, Madman
10/4 - The Incubus + World Word Z
10/5 - Bring Her Back
10/6 - Train to Busan + Color Out of Space
10/7 - 976-EVIL + Pumpkinhead
10/8 - The Brood
10/9 - Vamp + Gothic + Silver Bullet + The Lost Boys
10/10 - The Thing (2011) + John Carpenter's The Thing
10/11 - The Night Eats the World
10/12 - IT (2017) + Gremlins
10/13 - Halloween III: Season of the Witch + Friday the 13th Part III
10/14 - The Substance
10/15 - Talk to Me
10/16 - The Dead Don't Die
10/17 - Hereditary
10/18 - Death Screams
10/19 - Poltergeist

The OG one. Absolute banger classic. Y'all already know.
 
By the way for anyone that doesn't have Tubi its free and a goldmine for 80s horror movies. You have to put with ads ofc but well worth it.

Currently has House, Chopping Mall, Sorority House Massacre, Prom Night 1 and 2, Cutting Class, The Boogeyman, One Dark Night, Butcher Baker Nightmare Maker, The Incubus, Without Warning, The Exterminator and Puppet Master etc.

It had wishmaster as of last year too. Tubi is goated.
 
Movie 13- Rob Zombie's Halloween (2007)

Another one I haven't seen in many years. This is a tough one to really parse out my thoughts on. I can see why it's pretty polarizing. From what I recall regarding many fans of the franchise who dislike this film, they really lacked any affinity for Zombie and co.'s attempts to go into Myers' backstory. For these critics, trying to give some plot exposition to Myers' childhood is missing the whole point of the character. That said, I didn't have a problem with that first forty minutes or so of the film, then and I don't now, either. The way I see it, Zombie was sort of damned if he did, damned if he didn't. If he had just made a straight up Carpenter adaptation with just more brutality, people would say what the hell is the point, a la Gus Van Sant's adaptation of Psycho. But when he tries to put his own spin on it, people also found it to be an unnecessary or unwanted addition to a story that was good in its simplicity.

As far as I'm concerned, if you find the opening portion of the film to be substandard, the part that sticks to the Carpenter narrative is probably not going to be enough to win you back over. That said, if you find the opening scenes interesting or, at least, tolerable, then this movie very well might strike you as, surprisingly, one of the better entries in the franchise overall. I say that because I, weirdly, believe it. This is no horror classic but I think it has enough going for it to put it over about half the other Halloween films in my rankings.

I've always felt that Zombie is a good visual filmmaker who, if paired with the right screenwriter, could probably deliver some really good horror film material. Some of the shots and aesthetics of this film are impressive. I do appreciate, also, that as familiar as the Carpenter narrative portion of the film is, it isn't a Van Sant Psycho situation where Zombie is actively trying to recreate what Carpenter already did so effectively. He sticks to the familiar story beats but he puts his own spin on things. The result is something that can't compare to the classic but feels like a pretty decent iteration of a Myers movie.

Pleasance and Jamie Lee of course leave big shoes to fill but I liked most of the casting decisions in this film. Scout Taylor-Compton was quite good, in my opinion. It's a different interpretation of Laurie. While Jamie Lee had sort of a quietly intense, introspective, maturity that set her apart from the two friend characters, Scout's Laurie is a bit lighter and more silly in her early scenes in the film. I liked that element because, once again, no point in trying to do the exact same thing. Malcom McDowell is a really solid actor who is almost always entertaining and I thought he did well in this. I particularly enjoyed the rare moments of levity since Pleasance, great as he always was, conveyed pure intensity at all times in those films. For instance, I chuckled when the cemetery caretaker is leading Loomis to the Myers mother headstone, not knowing he is the doctor who wrote the bestselling book on Michael. He derides the book, calling the book sales blood money and McDowell quickly says something to the effect of "I read the book. It's a masterpiece." lol.

Taylor Mane was good. I was a bit thrown by him in the scene when he escapes the institution, resembling and no-selling like a prime Kane

giphy.gif



But when he was actually wearing the iconic mask, I thought he had some good, menacing movements, particularly in that scene where he is pursuing Laurie, Tommy, and Lindsay.

Props on the casting of the great Brad Dourif and for casting Halloween alumnus Danielle Harris as Laurie's friend, Annie.

Also, I thoroughly enjoyed how they kept the gimmick of Lynda saying "totally" a la the '78 classic. That could have easily been excised, since that term was far bigger in the late 70s, 80s, and early 90s than circa 2007. But I thought that was a nice touch.

Ultimately, the film wears out its welcome during the final stretch but, overall, I thought it was a pretty good Halloween film. I feel like this held up better for me than any of the recent trilogy. Better than Halloween: Resurrection? Goes without saying.

6.6/10
 
Last edited:
Movie 13- Sleepy Hollow (1999)

I am a big fan of this film. It's pretty much annual viewing for me around this time of year. It's a great film to watch in the fall. I've conveyed my thoughts on this one multiple times in threads like Serious Movie Discussion so I'll just say that I like pretty much every aspect of it. There is a lot of talent involved in this production. Burton and his production design team do great work. One of the best cinematographers ever, Lubezki, is an ideal match for them as well. Elfman, one of the best film composers, in my opinion, delivers a great score as well. I love the opening credits scene because you get to see how all those guys complement one another in this film.



The visuals/aesthetics are excellent. So the fact that the mystery story is well-executed, the action involving the Headless Horseman is rendered very effectively (Ray Park obviously had a big hand in that), and the cast is uniformly good is all the more impressive.

When I saw this film in the theater in '99, I was a fan of Depp's work, particularly having enjoyed his performances in Scissorhands, Benny and June, and Ed Wood. But this was the film where I really got the sense that the guy could be a superstar. He is great in this film, in my opinion. He hits all the right notes and he makes Ichabod Crane a really compelling character. I appreciate the nuance he puts in this performance. His nonverbal reactions add a great deal. The character is not one-dimensional. At times, he is heroic, intelligent, committed and at other times, he comes across more as a skittish goof and yet there's no contradiction at all. That's probably one of the best aspects of Crane as the protagonist, his eccentricities and his general squeamishness (consider the scene where he freaks out about a spider and wants Marc Pickering to be the one to kill it) are played for laughs (and Depp is quite adept at the comedic portions of the film) but, when it really counts, Crane steps up time and time again. Easy character to root for.

I also really liked the dynamic between him and Ricci. Ricci adds a sort of ethereal goodness/virtue to her character and her scenes with Depp in the earlygoing, where she is sharing information about her family and her childhood, are compelling. The chemistry between the two makes the scene where she fears that Ichabod suspects her father of commanding the Headless Horseman all the more effective in contrast.

This film also has a lot of very solid supporting actors: the late, great Michael Gambon, Richard Griffiths, Ian McDiarmid, Hammer and Burton vet, the great Michael Gough, among them. Plus, Christopher Walken is ideally utilized in a highly memorable cameo. Christopher Lee is also awesome in a cameo at the beginning of the film. He gave credit for his later-career resurgence to Burton for casting him in this film. Since Burton clearly made this film as a homage to Hammer horror film, the inclusion of Lee is all the more fitting. Marc Pickering is very good as Masbath, the young Sleepy Hollow resident who pledges himself in service to Ichabod in the hopes of getting justice for his slain father.

As for the central mystery and the big plot reveal

I think the scene where Miranda Richardson (another very good actor in this film) summons the horseman a final time and reveals her plot to Ricci's character is terrific. It could easily have been a clunker, with too much plot exposition or too contrived of a monologue but Richardson is so compelling that she helps to make it one of the best scenes in the film. Her character also reminded me of another Burton antagonist, DeVito's Penguin, in one key aspect- much like DeVito, she does a great job of conveying a seething, all-encompassing bitterness. Given the heinous actions of both characters, the viewer is obviously not going to sympathize with them, but I think in both cases, the films present a scenario whereby a viewer might think that they really didn't have a shot given how badly things played out for them at an early age.

That said, I like the inclusion of Richardson playing the twin sister, the helpful witch who sets Crane and Masbath on the right track toward finding the Horseman's grave site. Given she had the same life experience, her presence does show that Richardson's antagonist character might have chosen a different path.

Awesome movie. My favorite one so far on this run.

8.3/10
 
Last edited:
Caught two pretty good ones today.

Heretic - two mormon missionaries stop at a professor of religions house and he is bent on ruin their faith. Very smartly written. Hugh Grant kills it as the weird and evil professor. 9/10

Talk to Me - must have missed this during covid or something. It starts off like a teen movie of the week but picks up pace. The premise is that a mystics hand was preserved in a sculpture and if you hold the hand, you can see dead people and if you say "I let you in" , they can possess you as long as you hold the hand. Pretty surprised how much better this got as the movie went on. The premise sounds like a dime a dozen teen horror flick but they executed it extremely well. 8.5/10
 
Last edited:
Movie 13- Rob Zombie's Halloween (2007)

Another one I haven't seen in many years. This is a tough one to really parse out my thoughts on. I can see why it's pretty polarizing. From what I recall regarding many fans of the franchise who dislike this film, they really lacked any affinity for Zombie and co.'s attempts to go into Myers' backstory. For these critics, trying to give some plot exposition to Myers' childhood is missing the whole point of the character. That said, I didn't have a problem with that first forty minutes or so of the film, then and I don't now, either. The way I see it, Zombie was sort of damned if he did, damned if he didn't. If he had just made a straight up Carpenter adaptation with just more brutality, people would say what the hell is the point, a la Gus Van Sant's adaptation of Psycho. But when he tries to put his own spin on it, people also found it to be an unnecessary or unwanted addition to a story that was good in its simplicity.

As far as I'm concerned, if you find the opening portion of the film to be substandard, the part that sticks to the Carpenter narrative is probably not going to be enough to win you back over. That said, if you find the opening scenes interesting or, at least, tolerable, then this movie very well might strike you as, surprisingly, one of the better entries in the franchise overall. I say that because I, weirdly, believe it. This is no horror classic but I think it has enough going for it to put it over about half the other Halloween films in my rankings.

I've always felt that Zombie is a good visual filmmaker who, if paired with the right screenwriter, could probably deliver some really good horror film material. Some of the shots and aesthetics of this film are impressive. I do appreciate, also, that as familiar as the Carpenter narrative portion of the film is, it isn't a Van Sant Psycho situation where Zombie is actively trying to recreate what Carpenter already did so effectively. He sticks to the familiar story beats but he puts his own spin on things. The result is something that can't compare to the classic but feels like a pretty decent iteration of a Myers movie.

Pleasance and Jamie Lee of course leave big shoes to fill but I liked most of the casting decisions in this film. Scout Taylor-Compton was quite good, in my opinion. It's a different interpretation of Laurie. While Jamie Lee had sort of a quietly intense, introspective, maturity that set her apart from the two friend characters, Scout's Laurie is a bit lighter and more silly in her early scenes in the film. I liked that element because, once again, no point in trying to do the exact same thing. Malcom McDowell is a really solid actor who is almost always entertaining and I thought he did well in this. I particularly enjoyed the rare moments of levity since Pleasance, great as he always was, conveyed pure intensity at all times in those films. For instance, I chuckled when the cemetery caretaker is leading Loomis to the Myers mother headstone, not knowing he is the doctor who wrote the bestselling book on Michael. He derides the book, calling the book sales blood money and McDowell quickly says something to the effect of "I read the book. It's a masterpiece." lol.

Taylor Mane was good. I was a bit thrown by him in the scene when he escapes the institution, resembling and no-selling like a prime Kane

giphy.gif



But when he was actually wearing the iconic mask, I thought he had some good, menacing movements, particularly in that scene where he is pursuing Laurie, Tommy, and Lindsay.

Props on the casting of the great Brad Dourif and for casting Halloween alumnus Danielle Harris as Laurie's friend, Annie.

Also, I thoroughly enjoyed how they kept the gimmick of Lynda saying "totally" a la the '78 classic. That could have easily been excised, since that term was far bigger in the late 70s, 80s, and early 90s than circa 2007. But I thought that was a nice touch.

Ultimately, the film wears out its welcome during the final stretch but, overall, I thought it was a pretty good Halloween film. I feel like this held up better for me than any of the recent trilogy. Better than Halloween: Resurrection? Goes without saying.

6.6/10

I was one of those people that didn't take to the Zombie version of Myers. Like you said I feel like it misses the point, and making him some sort of hulking monstrosity from an abusive childhood is just kinda meh. It tries to trade the chilling idea of evil personified in an altogether normal child for what I guess was an attempt at menace and terror. But I always say if it works for some people, fine by me. Wasn't for me.

Despite that this movie did show me that Zombie is a talented filmmaker, from someone who thought House of 1,000 Corpses was pretty dumb.
 
Caught two pretty good ones today.

Heretic - two mormon missionaries stop at a professor of religions house and he is bent on ruin their faith. Very smartly written. Hugh Grant kills it as the weird and evil professor. 9/10

Talk to Me - must have missed this during covid or something. It starts off like a teen movie of the week but picks up pace. The premise is that a mystics hand was preserved in a sculpture and if you hold the hand, you can see dead people and if you say "I let you in" , they can possess you as long as you hold the hand. Pretty surprised how much better this got as the movie went on. The premise sounds like a dime a dozen teen horror flick but they executed it extremely well. 8.5/10
Those are two great picks. Hugh Grant absolutely killed it , and I move it when horror movies can get introspective and the tension builds slowly.

I also dug Talk to Me. One of my favorite things about it is it totally avoids one of my big pet peeves in horror movies. Specifically how the horror/supernatural/scary aspects of the film happen in arbitrary ways. Like a haunted house is only haunted at rhe exsft right times to make a scare. Or something always disappears when its convenient for the plot to have no one believe the main charger. This one just set up the scenario and never avoided it. It always happened, no matter what, so they didnt get a way to "cheat" out of it.
 
Those are two great picks. Hugh Grant absolutely killed it , and I move it when horror movies can get introspective and the tension builds slowly.

I also dug Talk to Me. One of my favorite things about it is it totally avoids one of my big pet peeves in horror movies. Specifically how the horror/supernatural/scary aspects of the film happen in arbitrary ways. Like a haunted house is only haunted at rhe exsft right times to make a scare. Or something always disappears when its convenient for the plot to have no one believe the main charger. This one just set up the scenario and never avoided it. It always happened, no matter what, so they didnt get a way to "cheat" out of it.

Japanese horror like The Grudge is always interesting because they don't feel the need to explain it. It just is and is something existential and to be understood. I suppose Lovecraftian horror is sort of the same.
 
Quick questions. Are the movies unedited, commercials aside? Do they have english captions/subtitles?
Found this re closed captions.

About Closed Captions on Tubi
We offer Closed Captions whenever our content partners provide them to us. As we add more content, we strive to add more Closed Captions whenever possible!

Generally, our content is captioned if the video is a full-length movie or TV episode that has been shown on US television after September 2012 with captions.

Here's how to tell if a movie or show has captions available:

Open the Tubi app.
Select the video you'd like to watch from the Tubi home screen.
Make sure you see the CC icon near the top right of your screen, by the video's maturity rating (e.g. PG-13, TV-G, etc.). If the video doesn't have this icon, it doesn't have Closed Captions available on Tubi. This example shows the CC icon present:
For additional information on how to enable/disable closed captions on your device, please visit this article.
 
Back
Top