Weakest paths to a title or reign?

[Chomsky Honk]

It always bothered me Conor never fought Frankie when Conor was at his peak at featherweight.

 

[arcadeperfect]

Official doesn’t matter, condit won on points

And woodley ‘beating’ condit doesn’t matter becuase it wasn’t for the title which is the point of interest in this discussion, and it was a fluke leg tko injury on the leg that woodley didn’t even kick

So in other words what you said is completely irrelevant

Lol it doesn't matter if you think Condit won, he didn't. Official results are what matters, not your opinion.

 

[RonDante]

Although I do agree with Islam, that’s a tough one, because he can beat the top 5 on paper. Him getting the title does make sense, but he didn’t beat those big name guys. I don’t know if I would say gifted though. Did he get his title shot after the Bobby Green win?

Yes. I’m not an Islam hater, I actually like him and want him to build a real legacy but he didn’t deserve the shot with the wins he had at the time. Now we know how good he is but not then

 

[RonDante]

Lol it doesn't matter if you think Condit won, he didn't. Official results are what matters, not your opinion.

Fights are won and lost on the judging criteria. Condit won by the judging criteria. Condit won official or not. It’s that simple

Also if you think like this then I better not see you complaining about any decisions from here on out okay?

 

[WoozyFailGuy]

Kamaru had the easiest title reign of the modern era, fighting Masvidal twice (lol) and Colby twice, who is only held in high regard due to losing to Usman. Who is Colby's best win? Exactly.
Burns, a bloated lightweight, was Kamaru's best win.
The people that were saying the boring footstool clinch wrestler would have beat GSP were the worst part of this forum for a good year.