• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

We could've gotten Pettis vs. Conor, but Conor chose Nate?

Most of the fan polls on various sites voted for Nate as the #1 replacement choice.

The fans spoke - McG listened. :D
 
Arm Barbarian said:
Most of the fan polls on various sites voted for Nate as the #1 replacement choice.

The fans spoke - McG listened. :D
Click to expand...

Was Pettis in those polls, and are you sure a bunch of ZUFFA shills weren't on those sites just clicking Nate 24/7.

Just like when Floyd had that poll on his next match up, and somehow a bunch of people picked a Maidana rematch, when everyone wanted to see an Amir Khan fight.
 
Pettis is on a 2 fight losing streak.

Nate just had a great performance dispatching Michael Johnson who is no joke pretty impressively. Right now, Nate is the more appealing fight.

I'm sure if they did pick Pettis, people would bitch and say things like "Conor is fighting a guy on a 2 fight losing streak??!? He should've fought Diaz!"

In conclusion, regardless who they picked, there would still be whining and complaining.
 
KORMAN said:
Was Pettis in those polls, and are you sure a bunch of ZUFFA shills weren't on those sites just clicking Nate 24/7.

Just like when Floyd had that poll on his next match up, and somehow a bunch of people picked a Maidana rematch, when everyone wanted to see an Amir Khan fight.
Click to expand...

its-a-conspiracy.jpg
 
Pettis would have been the easier fight. Look at how easily Alvarez took care of him.
 
KORMAN said:
WTF.......
Click to expand...

Not saying Pettis would have been a good fight by he just got beat and looked terrible in his last fight.

No matter who McGregor fights, bitches gonna bitch.

He could fight Robbie Lawler and you would say he is ducking Holloway 2.0.
 
Sally Davis said:
Pettis is on a 2 fight losing streak.

Nate just had a super impressive performance dispatching Michael Johnson who is no joke with ease. Right now, Nate is the more appealing fight.

I'm sure if they did pick Pettis, people would bitch and say things like "Conor is fighting a guy on a 2 fight losing streak??!? He should've fought Diaz!"

In conclusion, regardless who they picked, there would still be whining and complaining.
Click to expand...

Pettis lost to the champ, and got wall and stalled against Eddie. Oh yeah, and he's a former champ for god's sake. He took out the guy that beat Nate like he owed him money in 1 round, and finished the other guy that's supposed to fight Conor, Cowboy like he was an ant.

Miss me with that 2 fight losing streak BS. Nate's been beaten down so bad by 3 fighters, and he's 2-3 in his last 5. And MJ JUST lost to Dariush for God's sake.
 
This was an easy decision.

Easy win for what? 10-15 million lol easy decision.

Then headline UFC 200 to break UFC 100's PPV record when you can hold the UFC hostage for 20-30 million dollars since Rousey isn't fighting on the card? lmao Easy decision folks Business 101.
 
Sosua said:
Not saying Pettis would have been a good fight by he just got beat and looked terrible in his last fight.

No matter who McGregor fights, bitches gonna bitch.

He could fight Robbie Lawler and you would say he is ducking Holloway 2.0.
Click to expand...

Bro, he got wall n stalled. Conor does not wall n stall lmao. You guys understand how fighting works? Pettis vs. Conor is way more fire works, and the much more competitive fight. Nate's just gonna follow him around the cage, and get picked apart for however long it lasts.
 
pettis doesnt move his head and would have got starched in round 1

at least diaz has good boxing and a solid chin
 
Well he chose Duck Anjos, but he flew south for the winter
 
Conor fans all chose the guy who wasn't in a camp or in fight shape. They figure Nate's been laying on the couch smoking.
 
KORMAN said:
Pettis lost to the champ, and got wall and stalled against Eddie. Oh yeah, and he's a former champ for god's sake. He took out the guy that beat Nate like he owed him money in 1 round, and finished the other guy that's supposed to fight Conor, Cowboy like he was an ant.

Miss me with that 2 fight losing streak BS. Nate's been beaten down so bad by 3 fighters, and he's 2-3 in his last 5. And MJ JUST lost to Dariush for God's sake.
Click to expand...

Dairush didn't win that fight, that was a robbery.
 
UFCfan91 said:
pettis doesnt move his head and would have got starched in round 1

at least diaz has good boxing and a solid chin
Click to expand...

LMAO Diaz has been beat down 3x alrady, and his feet are as slow as mollasses. And Pettis would kick Conor's ribs in or kick his head off. Stop defending this BS.
 
Either fight would have been fine

It's not all about you

Quit being a whiner
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,260,310
Messages
57,021,183
Members
175,500
Latest member
mcjinglenuts

Share this page

Back
Top