@Black Angus,
@Tules
Both of you are senior to me here and I don't mean any disrespect by this, but mods do have a case in that Forum Rules expressly disapprove of the following:
Offensive Posts, Links or Images: This means - No rape threads/posts/images No shit threads/posts/images No beastiality threads/posts/images No overtly pornographic threads/posts/images No 


phile/incest threads/posts/images No grossout threads/posts/images
IIRC, the thread drew on genitalia size and degrees of punishment for which in cases of rape. However engaging of a legal discussion was to ensue, you can imagine from an administrative standpoint how a thread like this would be akin to a matchstick held over spilt benzine.
Reckoned your thread was in OT, not Berry, mate? Notwithstanding this, an issue is that OT pretty much thrives off of testing every rule above, so although rules might be laxer there, I could see wiggle room for the like being a contentious judgement call.
Again, no disrespect.