• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Was Your Thread Deleted, Moved or Merged? Ask about it here

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hey mods. Take a break from
washing weenies real quick.

There was a thread in the berry
a few days ago about virtial porn.
I had a write up on feminism in there.
It was pretty long & concise.

I'd like it back. (My content,
not the thread) thanks.
 
Hey mods. Take a break from washing weenies real quick.

It was pretty long & concise.

Threads and posts discussing pornography, as well as ones that are sexually graphic, are not permitted on this forum. Making a thread asking why another thread about an obviously prohibited topic was deleted is equally unwise.

Also, something can't be long yet concise.
Additionally, the term "disenfranchise" generally refers to someone not being allowed to vote.
 
Threads and posts discussing pornography, as well as ones that are sexually graphic, are not permitted on this forum. Making a thread asking why another thread about an obviously prohibited topic was deleted is equally unwise.

Also, something can't be long yet concise.
Additionally, the term "disenfranchise" generally refers to someone not being allowed to vote.
"Long" for a forum post.
& keyword "generally".
Hence, "concise".

Now give me my shit
 
Any other reason as to why someone who takes the times to create original content for this forum would have it thrown away as soon as it's posted?
The premise just makes it come off as a story...I suppose, hah.
 
The premise just makes it come off as a story...I suppose, hah.
Meh, it got wastelanded in seconds purely based on the title, which I should have reconsidered in hindsight, though it would have helped the thread gain views and therefore facilitated the discussion. Of course, what's the point of creating content in the first place if it might be arbitrarily discarded. Twitter links and Shane Carwin discussion only, got it. Thanks for the response though.
 
Meh, it got wastelanded in seconds purely based on the title, which I should have reconsidered in hindsight, though it would have helped the thread gain views and therefore facilitated the discussion. Of course, what's the point of creating content in the first place if it might be arbitrarily discarded. Twitter links and Shane Carwin discussion only, got it. Thanks for the response though.
I can move it back if you think of a different title.
 
I can move it back if you think of a different title.
Thanks, but I think I'll rework the premise a bit in a new thread some time, the moment has sort of passed for the topic to feel relevant. Nice to know there is some sort of recourse for these kind of things though as I was contemplating my account suicide with every Hyundai that whizzed by. Thanks for the offer though, sincerely.
 
Thanks, but I think I'll rework the premise a bit in a new thread some time, the moment has sort of passed for the topic to feel relevant. Nice to know there is some sort of recourse for these kind of things though as I was contemplating my account suicide with every Hyundai that whizzed by. Thanks for the offer though, sincerely.
Hah, no problem, man. Need anything, just ask.
 

Here are a few things:
1) Threads relocated to the wasteland do not per se violate a rule, as much as they are better suited for discussion in the wasteland than the heavies. Read the Wasteland Hand Guide for more information.

2) Comparing a thread that you think remains in the heavies vs a thread that was moved to the wasteland is irrelevant, because each thread is handled on a case-by-case basis by any number of moderators that are online, and the relocation of threads is subject to that particular mod's discretion.

3) Accusing a moderator of being a "coward" for moving your thread to the wasteland but not another thread that you feel should be also moved to the wasteland is unwise and doesn't even make sense.

4) Both of those threads are in the wasteland, so I don't know what you're talking about.

5) In the case of your thread, I assume it was moved to the wasteland because it was based on a flawed premise: that heavyweights fight at "different weight classes" despite being in the same division. As you probably are familiar, Heavyweights range at 206-265 pounds, which is substantially different than the other divisions. Mark Hunt fought Stefan Struve, they're in the same weight class.

6) Another Conor thread? By masking your thread with the title and attempted context of the JDS/Rothwell fight despite it really a McGregor thread, it still doesn't actually add anything to the conversation. The sole takeaway from your thread, essentially, is "[McGregor] will just have to use smart boxing." There have been countless threads on that topic.
 
I made a thread about GSP saying he walks around the same weight as Conor. Why was it deleted?
 
I made a thread about GSP saying he walks around the same weight as Conor. Why was it deleted?
It was deleted because of a Misleading thread title.
 
How come when I have a few drinky poos and make a drunk thread it gets deleted but everyone elses is cool, let's hang out here.

I thought this new forum was suppose to also notify people of these things so people don't wonder or so on and etc

thanks peeps
 
How come when I have a few drinky poos and make a drunk thread it gets deleted but everyone elses is cool, let's hang out here.

I thought this new forum was suppose to also notify people of these things so people don't wonder or so on and etc

thanks peeps
I've just going to assume you're posting in the wrong areas, Clips, lol.
 
Clippy belts aren't allowed to make drunk threads.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top