Was Queen Eliz Found Guilty of Missing Kids

[Cheese]

I am not sure what the hell is true with this story from the past and everylink looks like BS but I am reading that she killed 13 kids in some ritual back in the day. Like I said cant find a "Legit" webstory to confirm but does seem like something they might try to hide from public knowage. So anyone heard this story and got more info on it.

 

[rj144]

I can tell you she wasn't found guilty.

 

[Graves The Elder]

hm, thread sounds cheesy

 

[aunshi189]

Well if I can't find any evidence of it it must just mean that it's soooo true that they've had to go to great lengths to hide it.

 

[lts5025]

I am not sure what the hell is true with this story from the past and everylink looks like BS but I am reading that she killed 13 kids in some ritual back in the day. Like I said cant find a "Legit" webstory to confirm but does seem like something they might try to hide from public knowage. So anyone heard this story and got more info on it.

I heard you molested a bunch of kids a few years back. I mean, I don’t have any legitimate sources on it, but it’s does seem like something you’d try to hide from public knowledge.

 

[Cheese]

I keep seeing shit like this

The order to arrest Queen Elizabeth was issued in 2013 by six judges of the International Common Law Court of Justice in Brussels

https://mainerepublicemailalert.com...g-children-case-whistle-blowers-incarcerated/

but dont know if those judges are real or not.

 

[Cheese]

I heard you molested a bunch of kids a few years back. I mean, I don’t have any legitimate sources on it, but it’s does seem like something you’d try to hide from public knowledge.

Anylink links to this story from anyone. I might be able to get paid. I got a ton of links to the queen's story. If they lying on her, she could probly get rich.

 

[lts5025]

I keep seeing shit like this



https://mainerepublicemailalert.com...g-children-case-whistle-blowers-incarcerated/

but dont know if those judges are real or not.

Seems like this shit would be pretty easy to verify if true. Start by figuring out if there is really such a thing as this court in Brussels.

Usually real courts and real judges are listed in multiple pages on legitimate websites, not just on crackpot conspiracy blogs.

The let that sink in.

 

[moreorless87]

Rather more legit royal scandal although obviously little to do with her directly as a young child.

 

[Phlog]

Rather more legit royal scandal although obviously little to do with her directly as a young child.

The royal families German history is not a scandal, it is well known. The whole aristocracy had close links with Germany. Germany and England are brother and sister countries.

 

[Tuf_guy]

The royal families German history is not a scandal, it is well known. The whole aristocracy had close links with Germany. Germany and England are brother and sister countries.

So WWII was largely a sibling spat that others pushed over the edge?

This is really news to me, though. I don't get the point of these people and the attention they get. That's quite the plot twist, though.

 

[moreorless87]

The royal families German history is not a scandal, it is well known. The whole aristocracy had close links with Germany. Germany and England are brother and sister countries.

That's not really a scandal, Edward the 7th's relations with the Nazi's are though.

 

[nhbfan8080]

I am not sure what the hell is true with this story from the past and everylink looks like BS but I am reading that she killed 13 kids in some ritual back in the day. Like I said cant find a "Legit" webstory to confirm but does seem like something they might try to hide from public knowage. So anyone heard this story and got more info on it.

I'm guessing only right wing websites would carry this sort of articles.

 

[Phlog]

So WWII was largely a sibling spat that others pushed over the edge?

This is really news to me, though. I don't get the point of these people and the attention they get. That's quite the plot twist, though.

Yeah that's it basically. They're leaders who became reality stars. Reverse Trumps if you will.

 

[moreorless87]

Yeah that's it basically. They're leaders who became reality stars. Reverse Trumps if you will.

That's something far in the past of course, your going back to Charles the 1st to the last monarch who tried to reign absolutely and it didn't end well for him.

 

[Phlog]

That's something far in the past of course, your going back to Charles the 1st to the last monarch who tried to reign absolutely and it didn't end well for him.

Not at all, the monarch still wields an incredible amount of power, both as head of state and by established wealth and power structures.

The conversation in another thread about the world's second most influential nation illustrates the influence of soft power. Absolute power is an anachronism in our modern day.

The Queen has a great deal of power. Huge numbers of people, institutions and world leaders show deference to her. Our militarys all swear to her, by and large they mean it. Our secret service report to her, as does our prime minister every week. She is a constant in an ever changing system, a wealth of knowledge and influence.

 

[moreorless87]

Not at all, the monarch still wields an incredible amount of power, both as head of state and by established wealth and power structures.

The conversation in another thread about the world's second most influential nation illustrates the influence of soft power. Absolute power is an anachronism in our modern day.

The Queen has a great deal of power. Huge numbers of people, institutions and world leaders show deference to her. Our militarys all swear to her, by and large they mean it. Our secret service report to her, as does our prime minister every week. She is a constant in an ever changing system, a wealth of knowledge and influence.

It still has a good deal of power I'd agree in terms of indirect influence but little in the way of actual control.

Americans especially seem to have this fantasy that George the 3rd was an absolute moncarch for example when ironically they were allied with Louis the 16th who was.

 

[Cid]

So WWII was largely a sibling spat that others pushed over the edge?

This is really news to me, though. I don't get the point of these people and the attention they get. That's quite the plot twist, though.

Try looking up the family history of the leaders of the first world war...

 

[gspieler]

So WWII was largely a sibling spat that others pushed over the edge?

This is really news to me, though. I don't get the point of these people and the attention they get. That's quite the plot twist, though.

The only thing Hitler wanted from England at the onset of WWII was non-involvement. That war was an idealogical war, on a global scale. It was far from WWI 2.0.

 

[moreorless87]

The only thing Hitler wanted from England at the onset of WWII was non-involvement. That war was an idealogical war, on a global scale. It was far from WWI 2.0.

The Nazi's goals were always much more focused on Europe as well where as imperial Germany was strongly driven by colonialist desire to build an empire similar to Britain or France.