- Joined
- Oct 30, 2004
- Messages
- 95,963
- Reaction score
- 35,164
Conor is great, but not perfect, clearly. I mean, how special can a guy be if he gets out boxed and sub'ed in the 2nd round by 19-10 Nate Diaz?
Diaz has some big weaknesses that make him vulnerable to a lot of good fighters, but McGregor didn't have the skillset to exploit them. What I was impressed with was the adjustments he made in the second fight--both technical adjustments in his approach (note how in the first fight, he lunges in--with some success--and doesn't exit cleanly; and how in the second fight, he hangs back and uses parries to set up strikes) and the way he was effectively able to slow his pace down and still compete. I don't see this as like a 60/40 fight that just happened to go one way each time. He genuinely improved between the fights--the McGregor who lost to Diaz the first time would have lost to him the second time. Point is that what's special there isn't just that he's a very high level striker--it's kind of "meta" categories that he excels at. Anyone who saw that early deserves credit (obviously some people were just lucky).