- Joined
- Mar 3, 2014
- Messages
- 57,531
- Reaction score
- 21,614
Dude is really losing his shit over a somewhat hyperbolic comment.
Can we all at least agree that knowing what we know now, using gold as money would be really stupid?
I'm not the guy(s) too emotional on the subject to take a dispassionate look at the pros and cons of the different systems. Further evidenced by your post here where you demonstrate your fixation on hyping up one system and smearing the other. You're so skewed on this you think not joining your chorus of ridicule is "losing my shit". If you took a step back from whatever has you so emotionally invested in this (one-man) argument you'd see that.
The first thing I said (to my recollection) is that going back would be problematic. If you take that statement as some kind of advocacy of switching systems I don't know what to tell you. It's clear you're doing all you can to misrepresent or bait me into taking that position. The gold standard lost dude. Get over it. Doesn't change the fact that it worked well enough that people chose to use it for thousands of years and that it didn't stop America from getting built. Using your donkey analogy, just because we have motor vehicles now doesn't mean people throughout history were stupid for having ever ridden them.
tl;dr: It wasn't so much hyperbole in my mind as it was mis-characterization. Somewhere between stupid and optimal is functional. It clearly functioned.
Any thoughts on the Patriots saga? For most NFL fans it's a real treat to see such drama coming out of that organization.