War Room OT Discussion v2

[senri]

Why the hell didn't enough people take Jack up on his POTWR proposal? That thread would've been nonstop entertainment damn it. "Jacky V vs The World"

He hasn't marinated to his pinnacle. The flesh must be assuaged a certain way so that it melts eloquently inside our mouths. It's the same narrative you will taste when the time comes.

 

[Jack V Savage]

Yeah I go through this too sometimes.... who the fuck tries to claim CNN has pro-Trump bias.... What the actual fuck?

Anyone who studies the issue in a serious way.

What's striking to me is how at least here, right-wingers seem to have no exposure at all to alternate viewpoints, and they're not able to understand them (even if only to eventually disagree). I don't see that happening among folks who aren't right-wing fanatics. There's a big cult-like element here (particularly pronounced among right-wing "libertarians"). Objective reality is just completely shut off from you guys' worldview, and it's reinforced by social pressure (facts that upset the tribe are treated like viruses).

Everyone knows campaign promises are always followed through on. You must be new to politics.

Campaign promises in general are almost always followed through on. Haven't looked at the numbers lately, but it's something like two-thirds that are pretty much done, with almost all of the remaining third in the "tried but failed" category (like, couldn't get the proposal through Congress).

 

[lecter]

Btw- I'm convinced you're a troll because no one could be this stupid.

Admittedly you got me Jack.

It's pretty obvious for quite some time now.
But I also got fooled and I usually recognize trolls if I see them.

 

[dontsnitch]

Yeah I go through this too sometimes.... who the fuck tries to claim CNN has pro-Trump bias.... What the actual fuck?

I'm surprised no one has made a thread about the Harvard study regarding media bias where they compare positive and negative coverage of Trump. I saw it on other forums, but it never made it here.

 

[Jack V Savage]

I'm surprised no one has made a thread about the Harvard study regarding media bias where they compare positive and negative coverage of Trump. I saw it on other forums, but it never made it here.

There was a thread on it, and it reinforced exactly what I've mentioned.

https://shorensteincenter.org/news-...il&utm_term=0_10959edeb5-ab6d830a9d-189799085

• President Trump dominated media coverage in the outlets and programs analyzed, with Trump being the topic of 41 percent of all news stories—three times the amount of coverage received by previous presidents. He was also the featured speaker in nearly two-thirds of his coverage.
• Republican voices accounted for 80 percent of what newsmakers said about the Trump presidency, compared to only 6 percent for Democrats and 3 percent for those involved in anti-Trump protests.

The overall coverage was mostly negative because his presidency has been a dumpster fire, but the media has tried to balance that by giving wildly disproportionate voices to Republicans.

 

[Son of Jamin]

 

[lecter]

what's that?

 

[senri]

what's that?

Aged Ivory flesh.

 

[senri]

You won't be able to avoid if forever Mr @Jack V Savage

 

[Jack V Savage]

You won't be able to avoid if forever Mr @Jack V Savage

I'm not a fan of your gimmick. It's interesting, and I know there's an interesting poster buried under there, but it gets old really fast. Maybe try to push it into the background. Post interesting stuff while using it. I think @ripskater has shown some good development with his.

 

[senri]

I'm not a fan of your gimmick. It's interesting, and I know there's an interesting poster buried under there, but it gets old really fast. Maybe try to push it into the background. Post interesting stuff while using it. I think @ripskater has shown some good development with his.

It takes time to settle deep inside of you, so don't ponder on The Nexus for too long or the nature of The Ennui will build. I don't want you to be consumed by the antithesis or your benevolent genesis.

I need you to be beautiful and delicious for all us Mr Savage...

 

[brothir]

I'm not a fan of your gimmick. It's interesting, and I know there's an interesting poster buried under there, but it gets old really fast. Maybe try to push it into the background. Post interesting stuff while using it. I think @ripskater has shown some good development with his.

He's at his best when people at first unintentionally play into it and then they follow his lead, but when he forces it like this it becomes very stale. It has to be spontaneous, and he has to emerge, suddenly, from nowhere, like a horror movie monster. When the stars align, it's some of the best fun I've had on here. Reading the aftermath of a thread that was properly senri'd is something else.

That aside, I remember someone in the boxing subforum asking him for his thoughts about a fight, and he gave a very competent analysis. When he gets serious, he comes across as quite sharp. More of that, please.

 

[senri]

He's at his best when people at first unintentionally play into it and then they follow his lead, but when he forces it like this it becomes very stale. It has to be spontaneous, and he has to emerge, suddenly, from nowhere, like a horror movie monster. When the stars align, it's some of the best fun I've had on here. Reading the aftermath of a thread that was properly senri'd is something else.

That aside, I remember someone in the boxing subforum asking him for his thoughts about a fight, and he gave a very competent analysis. When he gets serious, he comes across as quite sharp. More of that, please.

Only when you accept your true calling for all of us to masticate Mr Brothir. As i always say, time will heal all towards The Nexus. I only want what's best for my fellow Sapiens. The nature of the cosmos narrative ebbs and flows through a relaxing turmoil followed by it's beautiful contraction. Don't elucidate beyond the periphery too much, it's more delicious that way.

 

[AgonyandIrony]

White nationalists in America are an insignificant fringe group that don't even move the needle. philes probably make up a bigger demographic.

And you're doing a whole lot of mischaracterizing and conflating to the point that you're nonsensical.

Out of respect for the OT thread I'll leave it at that but i hope to see you make the same idiotic claims in the wr where I will spend the time to put you back in your little box like I always do.

I'll be honest dude, based on your posts you come off as a bit of a white supremacist in your posts. You also seem to go out of your way to defend white nationalism, and in a racial thread you come across.. maybe not Stormfront... but certainly like a /pol/ dude, and I think the saturation of sassy ass racist language and groups of neckbeards all circle jerking each other has had a weird national impact. It's a weird culture you're apart of imo.

 

[WiolentOne]

I'll be honest dude, based on your posts you come off as a bit of a white supremacist in your posts. You also seem to go out of your way to defend white nationalism, and in a racial thread you come across.. maybe not Stormfront... but certainly like a /pol/ dude, and I think the saturation of sassy ass racist language and groups of neckbeards all circle jerking each other has had a weird national impact. It's a weird culture you're apart of imo.

Yeah, your post doesnt say or mean anything. You're also a Zionist so it's easy for you mislabel people to deflect criticism and attempt to shutdown discourse.

I don't really care what you think about me. If there is a certain issue or stance or quote that you disagree with me about then go ahead. But saying to me that "you kinda come off as a blaha blaha" doesn't mean anything.

Btw- the WR OGs know I'm the furthest thing from white. I've claimed the same brown race years ago when i was leftist here and im the same brown race i am today as a right winger.

So fuck what you think snowflake.

 

[Jack V Savage]

@Lead, so if I get any new news on Barbara Bush being the daughter of Alistair Crowley or pictures that further solidify the case, should I just search for the old threads on it and bump them? Or is there a certain amount of time that passes before it's OK to start a new thread on the same subject?

 

[Lead]

@Lead, so if I get any new news on Barbara Bush being the daughter of Alistair Crowley or pictures that further solidify the case, should I just search for the old threads on it and bump them? Or is there a certain amount of time that passes before it's OK to start a new thread on the same subject?

I kept zankous thread guidelines. It's the same norm you've seen going on. Once enough time passes, a new thread is fine. Even if there's duplicates, we just merge them. Just saves us some work to tell people to look

 

[Lead]

@Lead, so if I get any new news on Barbara Bush being the daughter of Alistair Crowley or pictures that further solidify the case, should I just search for the old threads on it and bump them? Or is there a certain amount of time that passes before it's OK to start a new thread on the same subject?

Also, I laughed

 

[VivaRevolution]

Saves ever doing it in real life which probably saves some friendships. I find anytime people talk politics in real life, people end up angry at each other. People try to surround themselves with people they agree with and when they run into opposition, they get defensive and thus angry. This place lets me talk without worrying about that stuff cause usually people here have thicker skin or if they get mad at me, it's not the end of the world having someone I never met dislike "Lead".

I have engaged in a one man jihad against this phenomena.

I basically refuse to engage in a conversation that lasts more then 5 minutes unless politics is discussed, and no matter how agitated or defensive a person becomes, I stay as cool as the other side of the pillow. This forum actually helped me develop the discipline necessary to do this.

I think people would be entertained to know how far i have taken this. My last GF broke up with me over this. I annoy friends and family with my constant derailement of non-sense small talk conversation........

Example:

"That weather is crazy outside, raining like cats and dogs."

"Not as crazy as the weather in Yemen, it is raining cluster bombs there."

I have been doing this for years now, with some surprising effects. In my last work area, I had created a culture of about 30 people at work, that discussed nothing but politics, and it stayed civil. People started copying the way I stayed calm, and responding with civil disagreement.

 

[Lead]

I have engaged in a one man jihad against this phenomena.

I basically refuse to engage in a conversation that lasts more then 5 minutes unless politics is discussed, and no matter how agitated or defensive a person becomes, I stay as cool as the other side of the pillow. This forum actually helped me develop the discipline necessary to do this.

I think people would be entertained to know how far i have taken this. My last GF broke up with me over this. I annoy friends and family with my constant derailement of non-sense small talk conversation........

Example:

"That weather is crazy outside, raining like cats and dogs."

"Not as crazy as the weather in Yemen, it is raining cluster bombs there."

I have been doing this for years now, with some surprising effects. In my last work area, I had created a culture of about 30 people at work, that discussed nothing but politics, and it stayed civil. People started copying the way I stayed calm, and responding with civil disagreement.

"You must be great at parties"

I agree the forum can help you learn to stay level headed when having a conversation about it. I think some people naturally attach ideas too closely to their identity and when they see someone arguing against the idea (even when they are trying to defend it), they assume they are being attacked. It's just a lack of being put in that situation and easily can be adjusted.