• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

War Room Lounge v88: Timely Yoga Sharts. Also, '88' is code for 'Heil Hipsters.' Plus lite doxxing.

Status
Not open for further replies.
why do people listen to Molyneux? He’s obviously a whimp like all those ‘I’m a masculine man in 2019 buy my book on selfhelp’ guys
I remember when people freaked out when Joe Rogan invited some guy that called him a cult leader

but to be fair, whens the last time you’ve seen someone post his video? I wouldn’t know he even exists anymore if he wasn’t frequently posted on Reddit for his insane tweets
 
Originally posted in the wrong thread, so tags may not have worked when I moved it here, so... @Lead @Ruprecht do you think this excuse-making is enough to condone this?

Moderators don't moderate each other, and we aren't going to have that sort of discussion in the general forum.
I can tell you though, that aside from empty flaming without addressing the topic, the definition of "over the top" flaming is highly subjective between moderators. I largely don't care as long as it's on topic, but if a poster is continuously flaming even while they still address the topic, there's a good chance of copping an infraction for it. Especially if they already have infractions for "empty flaming".
Accusations of murder, :eek::eek::eek::eek:philia, rape, threats of violence and involving a posters family members etc is explicitly mentioned in the rules as "over the top" and highly likely to get you infracted.
If someone breaks the rules, that's not a licence for tit-for-tat. Chances are everyone involved will get infracted.
 
@Jack V Savage I really can't believe you idolize this creep





Rent free? Guy, when you obsessively follow around a stranger, issuing them message board infractions because they make you feel dumb, you'll have a hard time making the argument that it is they who are preoccupied with you. You're a power-tripping forum mod: your life is paying internet rent.


Come on, go easy on him. It's all he has.
 
I hate Taylor Swift and her twig like appearance so goddamn much
 
If you grab someone’s ass without their consent, that’s sexual assault. No one cares about your bropinion on it.

Breaking news. Joe Biden is being charged with multiple counts of sexual assault on children
 
The thing is though, is that there are a lot of situations where people pat others on the behind, without it necessarily being seen as a sexual thing. All you have to do is look at a lot of men's sports. Depending on the context, it can be seen as a form of teasing, or even "motivational".

None of this excuses people going out there and doing this for no reason, but I think outright grabbing a person is a little different, still, from the old "pat on the back".

In that particular video's context you could definitely see it as a degrading act, but still less degrading than someone outright grabbing her.

You sir, support sexual assault for believing that.

Where are those videos of Biden groping what looked like scared to death children?
 
Breaking news. Joe Biden is being charged with multiple counts of sexual assault on children

....do you have any evidence of Joe Biden forcibly grabbing kids' butts?
 
Homosexual confirmed ^^^^
SHE HAS THE BODY TYPE OF A 12 YEAR OLD BOY!

And as a believer in music like this:



She's is the definition of a sellout bitch. Add to that that if she were anything other than pasty as fuck white everyone would have turned on her for selling out to be the "wholesome" version of like Britney Spears and shit and then you add the fact she's a woman so as soon as you criticize her the fucking "reeeeee" brigade shows up saying you can't.

Fuck her and the horse she pretends to ride on.
 
I hate Taylor Swift and her twig like appearance so goddamn much
bent-over-taylor-swift-is-just-asking-to-get-photoshopped-17-photos-216.jpg
 
....do you have any evidence of Joe Biden forcibly grabbing kids' butts?

Oh. So it would have been ok for that man to actual grab that woman. Brush her chest with his arms. Kiss her face, smell her hair and push his body against her

This is where you guys lose it. You have to live by the rules you set. When you start saying a pat on the butt is sexual assault. That definition will also apply to your heroes
 
I didn't realize you were gay but it all makes sense now.

Obsession with phallic objects too.

<SelenaWow>
I’d totally stick my dick in her to show up in a song and sue the fuck out of her for rights to the song to get a piece of the pie but I’d rather be with some girl that gets some sub and has a little meat on her bones.

also

CCBA042A-F4CD-4304-BFB3-D8255FDE2A81.jpeg

I know it’s not the meme thread but figured some people could get a few laughs
 
Oh. So it would have been ok for that man to actual grab that woman. Brush her chest with his arms. Kiss her face, smell her hair and push his body against her

No, if he kissed her or touched her breasts without her consent, that would be sexual assault.

That's what sexual assault is: unwanted touching of sexual body parts, or, in the case of kissing, of an overtly sexual nature. In the case of Biden, it is non-sexual touching that is being consented to. Like....it very clearly doesn't meet either of the two obvious components.

This is where you guys lose it. You have to live by the rules you set. When you start saying a pat on the butt is sexual assault. That definition will also apply to your heroes

You are the only one that doesn't seem to understand these very basic rules. If you go up to a woman on the street and grab her butt, yes, you just committed sexual assault by definition and a judge will have no problem convicting you.

If you would like to soften or redirect your argument to saying that there should be more varied terminology so that more offensive actions aren't grouped in with less offensive actions, then you would have a point that many would agree with.
 
No, if he kissed her or touched her breasts without her consent, that would be sexual assault.

That's what sexual assault is: unwanted touching of sexual body parts, or, in the case of kissing, of an overtly sexual nature. In the case of Biden, it is non-sexual touching that is being consented to. Like....it very clearly doesn't meet either of the two obvious components.



You are the only one that doesn't seem to understand these very basic rules. If you go up to a woman on the street and grab her butt, yes, you just committed sexual assault by definition and a judge will have no problem convicting you.

If you would like to soften or redirect your argument to saying that there should be more varied terminology so that more offensive actions aren't grouped in with less offensive actions, then you would have a point that many would agree with.

Ok

Then it is time to charge Biden with multiple accounts of sexual assault on children. Since his touching of obviously scared children was much more sexual than an old dude patting(not grabbing or gropping) a grown woman. We should probably dig up elder Bushs bones and have a trial also.

You should make a thread on it
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top