War Room Lounge v78: Figure someone will make a thread eventually.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Calm down. Breathe. Sometimes, taking a brief walk can help.

That's condescending. It's fine, we're all big boys, but don't pretend to care about decency.

And obviously I'm not even mildly upset.

Who wrote anything about ethics?

I did.

Please: re-read these two sentences in succession.

In sentence one, you say "it has nothing to do with tribalism".

In sentence two, you appeal to "sides" and "defending".

Do you not see any problem here?

Yes, there is a major problem with your thinking on tribalism. We're taking sides on Trump's behavior here, which has nothing to do with being in tribes (at least for me).

I don't see it that way. The gestures/expressions appear to me to be those of a person who is flustered.
Maybe you should leave your basement once and a while and meet real people. Flustered? LOL
 
That's condescending. It's fine, we're all big boys, but don't pretend to care about decency.

And obviously I'm not even mildly upset.



I did.



Yes, there is a major problem with your thinking on tribalism. We're taking sides on Trump's behavior here, which has nothing to do with being in tribes (at least for me).


Maybe you should leave your basement once and a while and meet real people. Flustered? LOL
But is he okay with torture?
 
I've said it was immature and crass, plenty.



No, it's a mockery of regular people, he finds to be dumb. Oh' and...

LOL! Crass, now? No, he was a bully and an asshole. You just can't do it.



*GASP*

How absolutely dare you, Sir! Such a hateful, disableist comment.

A post from 2018? You really are obsessed with me. Weirdo.

No, you mean the left and their interests. If tomorrow he took up a bunch of left wing issues, like being pro-abortion, you would find him taking a "fairer" stance on things.

I'm clearly telling you what I mean but you choose to post in bad faith, as always. And I don't know what you mean by the "left's interests". I care about the good of the people, regardless of political leaning. I know, that's an idea foreign to you.

Or you would become pro-life, simply because Trump was pro-abortion. One or the other.

What are you rambling about?
 
Do any of you wonderful posters lip balm your lips preventing them from getting chapped during the winter?
I currently use this Japanese product (that has lasted me since I was last there over a year ago) but when that runs out I will likely try a bees wax lip balm that is made locally.
 
Yes, there is a major problem with your thinking on tribalism. We're taking sides on Trump's behavior here
Which sides?

That's condescending.
Incorrect.
don't pretend to care about decency
I do care about decency.

This conversation had nothing to do with decency. It started because I presented evidence that Trump was not mocking the reporter for the reporter's disability. Then you went on a bizarre, profanity-laced tirade. I can only conclude that you lost emotional control for some reason.
 
I've said it was immature and crass, plenty.



No, it's a mockery of regular people, he finds to be dumb. Oh' and...



*GASP*

How absolutely dare you, Sir! Such a hateful, disableist comment.



No, you mean the left and their interests. If tomorrow he took up a bunch of left wing issues, like being pro-abortion, you would find him taking a "fairer" stance on things.

Or you would become pro-life, simply because Trump was pro-abortion. One or the other.
You're talking to someone who became okay with torture during the Obama years. Bring it up and he'll publicly announce he's ignoring you while still reporting your posts.
 
But is he okay with torture?
the cruelest torture

source.gif
 
Which sides?

Stop wasting time.

Incorrect.

Now you're lying.

I do care about decency.

This conversation had nothing to do with decency.

It has everything to do with decency. I wonder if you're capable of having conversations IRL. Seriously, do you think you control every aspect of every exchange and decide what is relevant?

It started because I presented evidence that Trump was not mocking the reporter for the reporter's disability.

And I responded by saying those gestures are imitating someone that is disabled. Your laughable response was it struck you as someone who was flustered. Maybe if they were on cocaine.

Then you went on a bizarre, profanity-laced tirade. I can only conclude that you lost emotional control for some reason.
Oh grow up.
 
It started because I presented evidence that Trump was not mocking the reporter for the reporter's disability.

Huh? This isn't like some kind of mystery. Trump says, "did you see that guy?" And then mocks his disability. No one questions whether the video is real or not. It's as definitive as you can get.
 
Damn those tribalists trusting their eyes instead of the words of Dear Leader!
It is often the case in life that looking deeper is the only way to discover truth.

Many people believed and asserted that Hillary Clinton claimed that the Russian state was grooming Tulsi Gabbard to run as a third party candidate. Careful analysis of the original audio shows that Clinton was referring to Republicans, not Russians. This was not obvious at first glance even to professionals such as Jake Tapper and Van Jones.

It started because I presented evidence that Trump was not mocking the reporter for the reporter's disability.

Huh? This isn't like some kind of mystery. Trump says, "did you see that guy?" And then mocks his disability. No one questions whether the video is real or not. It's as definitive as you can get.
That reporter doesn't have body movements even approximating those that Trump made. It seems the reporter has no disabilities other than a deformed lower arm.

On the other hand, Trump has mocked many people (including himself) with the same type of body language and facial expressions. It seems to be his default "flustered person" imitation.
 
It is often the case in life that looking deeper is the only way to discover truth.

LOL! It's all right, everything is all right, the struggle is finished. Waiguoren has won the victory over himself. He loves Trump.
 
LOL! It's all right, everything is all right, the struggle is finished. Waiguoren has won the victory over himself. He loves Trump.
I have no idea what you are referring to, Mr. Jack. You are a swell fellow.
 
"We went through rain to get free candy in the prosperous and high-functioning social democratic economy that our parents built, before we tore it down, looted the economy, and horded our wealth while shrieking about laziness and how the gubberment is after our social security."

The.

WORST.

Generation.

Ever.

I barely agree with Trotsky on anything but one thing we agree on is our hatred of boomers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top