War Room Lounge v69: Oh no not the bees! Edition

[Deleted member 539235]

@Lead appreciated

 

[JDragon]

why am i on double yellows?

Do you hate Eurodance?

 

[Deleted member 539235]

Do you hate Eurodance?

how pure is the mdma?

 

[tonni]

@senri

You too, Lead???

 

[Witchhunt]

Incoming pole about Nic Cage movies, I believe.

8mm?

 

[EL CORINTHIAN]

Given your prior willingness to expend great time making long, rambling multi-quote posts on what right wing ideology means in your historical fan fiction, I'd say there is literally zero chance you're not full of shit.

Historical Fan fiction is still being a communist in the 21st century and taking everything that is slightly to the right of your Trotskyist non-sense and calling it right. You lack self awareness as to the time and place you are in comrade. You're a political dinosaur with dwindling relevance.

Now piss off.

 

[EL CORINTHIAN]

Glad to hear, but, at least until his apparent endorsement of that crowd, I didn't have any reason to think otherwise. With regard to his tremendously bad argument with JVS and Falsedawn before, it was and still is my position that it was not formed in ignorant good faith. But that doesn't mean he's a terrible human or incapable of compassion.

I'm very well versed in the history and you were not apart of the argument and neither was @Falsedawn. He started it and didn't have the brain power to continue it. You must be operating under the assumption that being in an echo chamber where you all cheer lead your intellectual leader @Jack V Savage while you chirp opposition in a freindly conversation means there was a winner there.

Go outside and get get laid already.

 

[Trotsky]

Historical Fan fiction is still being a communist in the 21st century and taking everything that to is slightly right of your Trotskyist non-sense and calling it right. You lack self awareness as to the time and place you are in comrade. You're a political dinosaur with dwindling relevance.

Now piss off.

Man, you sure are proving how little time you have to cite a single example of a supposedly frequent phenomenon.

And, no, I wasn't "apart" of that exchange because it was hilariously idiotic. It started out with the asinine assertion of a left wing hereditary monarch and only got more stupid somehow.

 

[EL CORINTHIAN]

Man, you sure are proving how little time you have to cite a single example of a supposedly frequent phenomenon.

And, no, I wasn't "apart" of that exchange because it was hilariously idiotic. It started out with the asinine assertion of a left wing hereditary monarch and only got more stupid somehow.

What you are asking me to do is sift through someone's post history and provide examples of past discussions and now you are trying to make it seem like me responding while eating breakfast is somehow equivalent?

Like I said before, you are out of touch. The fact that you think you are cunning is actually rather painful to watch. Go seize the means of production on someone else's time.

 

[Andy Capp]

Need some more background info. What's your take on eurodance?

Care to elaborate on this reference? I don't even know what that is.

I’ve seen examples of that personally. Can’t say what it is but I don’t believe it’s alcohol as it doesn’t match up with my examples. It’s weird it’s a certain age. I would think some people just are more of a magnet than others.

It's now known people can develop new allergies well into advanced age, and although andropause is not the well-defined and identifiable set of changes that menopause is, men certainly do go through changes of various kinds when they hit late middle-age. You didn't say; are your examples are men or women, or "a certain age"?. In my case, it's definitely extra weird. I lost the urge to smoke cigarettes (after a 30 year addiction), developed environmental allergies to every speck smaller than a grain of sand, and started noticing a bunch of food sensitivities I never had before.

I have to say I'm pretty disappointed at the total lack of reaction to the coincidence that I had a draft of a post that started with "I got stung by a bee", which I couldn't post in the intended thread, instead only being able to post it in the new thread, with "oh no, not the bees" in the title. @Fawlty what prompted that title, just for the sake of curiosity?

 

[Jack V Savage]

What you are asking me to do is sift through someone's post history and provide examples of past discussions and now you are trying to make it seem like me responding while eating breakfast is somehow equivalent?

Like I said before, you are out of touch. The fact that you think you are cunning is actually rather painful to watch. Go seize the means of production on someone else's time.

I linked to a thread where I think anyone reading fairly, regardless of ideological preferences, can see that he (Starman) was making a fool of himself. He was objectively wrong about a pretty basic issue, and his hostility was preventing him from being able to understand why. There are more examples of that kind of thing from him. I ignore him now, and that's why (has no ability to participate in reasonable discussion and just seems to have an endless well of hostility for people who don't agree with him). As I said, I'm skeptical that there are any examples of what you said--"ripping a new asshole" for any decent poster in a debate, unless that phrase just refers to expressing hatred with no substantive content. But if you have any, I'll take a look.

 

[Andy Capp]

I linked to a thread where I think anyone reading fairly, regardless of ideological preferences, can see that he (Starman) was making a fool of himself. He was objectively wrong about a pretty basic issue, and his hostility was preventing him from being able to understand why. There are more examples of that kind of thing from him. I ignore him now, and that's why (has no ability to participate in reasonable discussion and just seems to have an endless well of hostility for people who don't agree with him). As I said, I'm skeptical that there are any examples of what you said--"ripping a new asshole" for any decent poster in a debate, unless that phrase just refers to expressing hatred with no substantive content. But if you have any, I'll take a look.

@EL CORINTHIAN re: the bold text, I'm in. See, now you have 2 people to show up so maybe it's worth your while since you supposedly have lots of examples. I think he's a vacuous knob but in general I like to look for the good in people so I would love it if you can convince me I've been wrong all this time. Anytime I can recall that he has declared victory, or others have done so on his behalf, as right wing clownshoes on here are wont do do, it's been about posts too unfathomably stupid to be bothered to respond to, rather than them being too sharply crafted to address effectively. There are several examples of this in the last lounge thread from multiple users [edit: all of whom have several other similarities].

 

[Falsedawn]

I'm very well versed in the history and you were not apart of the argument and neither was @Falsedawn. He started it and didn't have the brain power to continue it. You must be operating under the assumption that being in an echo chamber where you all cheer lead your intellectual leader @Jack V Savage while you chirp opposition in a freindly conversation means there was a winner there.

Go outside and get get laid already.

Obsession noted.

Leftist goddamn king of England.

 

[EL CORINTHIAN]

I linked to a thread where I think anyone reading fairly, regardless of ideological preferences, can see that he (Starman) was making a fool of himself. He was objectively wrong about a pretty basic issue, and his hostility was preventing him from being able to understand why. There are more examples of that kind of thing from him. I ignore him now, and that's why (has no ability to participate in reasonable discussion and just seems to have an endless well of hostility for people who don't agree with him). As I said, I'm skeptical that there are any examples of what you said--"ripping a new asshole" for any decent poster in a debate, unless that phrase just refers to expressing hatred with no substantive content. But if you have any, I'll take a look.

My friend you are either going to have to accept the fact that im not about to indulge you or you cannot, but what ever the outcome you have to move on from this. Im a conservative. I respect your energy and presence on these boards but make no mistake me and you are at odds when it comes to politics and i won't be finding much to agree with. Continuing a conversation about another conservative poster in the left lounge is a losing battle and an arduous waste of time as the herd descends upon dissenting opinions.

Dick and fart jokes are fair game though. everyone laughs at those.

 

[EL CORINTHIAN]

Obsession noted.

Leftist goddamn king of England.

And the herd have arrived. This is why you needed to drag the conversation into this lounge in the first place because you couldn't actually carry your own weight.
You cried for help by dragging it in here and it actually ended up being a real debate. lol @ thinking the founding fathers and the king of England being the exact same thing you dopey fuck.


And the obsession is when multiple posters are asking me to dig up past conversations between them and him to fuel their monday morning. Nothing says "you have taken up serious mental real estate" like asking for such things.

 

[Falsedawn]

And the herd have arrived. This is why you needed to drag the conversation into this lounge in the first place because you couldn't actually carry your own weight.
You cried for help by dragging it in here and it actually ended up being a real debate. lol @ thinking the founding fathers and the king of England being the exact same thing you dopey fuck.

You are aware that you alerted me right?

I mean, I get that your brain function is subpar, but you can't be surprised that I posted to call you a retard when you yourself saw fit to put my name in your mouth. You're like a down syndrome surprised pikachu.

Also lol @ "lol @ thinking the founding fathers and the king of England being the exact same thing you dopey fuck"

What the fuck?

 

[EL CORINTHIAN]

You are aware that you alerted me right?

I mean, I get that your brain function is subpar, but you can't be surprised that I posted to call you a retard when you yourself saw fit to put my name in your mouth. You're like a down syndrome surprised pikachu.

You are aware i wasn't the one who brought you up first right? You were an after thought before and will continue to be one after this comment.

 

[EL CORINTHIAN]

Also lol @ "lol @ thinking the founding fathers and the king of England being the exact same thing you dopey fuck"

What the fuck?

This is what happens when you offload your mental short comings to your superiors. Maybe next time don't be a pussy and put up an argument.

 

[Falsedawn]

You are aware i wasn't the one who brought you up first right? You were an after thought before and will continue to be one after this comment.

I'm very well versed in the history and you were not apart of the argument and neither was @Falsedawn. He started it and didn't have the brain power to continue it. You must be operating under the assumption that being in an echo chamber where you all cheer lead your intellectual leader @Jack V Savage while you chirp opposition in a freindly conversation means there was a winner there.

Go outside and get get laid already.

Hi stupid, see that @ before my name? Why did I see you bleeding from your pussy about me again?

I mean, you're struggling with life, but this is a new height.

 

[tonni]

You are aware i wasn't the one who brought you up first right? You were an after thought before and will continue to be one after this comment.

You tagged him and then you make fun of him commenting here. That’s very oblivious of you.