War Room Lounge v64

Status
Not open for further replies.
I "don't say" Fawlty did that, he actually did do that to multiple posters.

Okay, and he was then banned, correct?

Where's your proof that your accused actually did that?

Deleted by the moderators, of course.

And bringing it up squashes your conspiracy theory about the mods playing favorites. They let a liberal poster back (on his 4th or 5th account) even after he tried to dox multiple posters.

It doesn't because he was banned. Meanwhile, you exclusively post here following Fawlty around and shit talking (including making up stories about how he fucks breakfast foods?) and making posts about Homer's personal life, ex-wife, and kids and are, of course, not infracted. So I honestly can't think of a poster who more embodies what we are talking about in inconsistent moderation than you.

The Rio Grande photo, I believe.

Yes, and I was the TS on that thread. It was a photo that was being shared in every major newspaper in the country. Yet whiny pedants immediately got out their rule books, started mashing the report button despite the OP being clearly outside of what the rules intended to censor, got the photo deleted, and are now whining that I wasn't carded for it.
 
Lies. Nothing was even talked about felons with the initial bet(that I signed off on, and you didn't).

Exactly. We were discussing whether Trump's claim that 1-3 million unauthorized immigrants voted. I said it was a ridiculous lie, and you agreed but were not willing to say it because you can't bring yourself to criticize "daddy." I said I accepted the bet, just clarifying that we're talking about unauthorized immigrants, as we'd been discussing, and a couple other categories we added. Then Greoric brought up ineligible felons. I said that those were a little more likely but the number still wouldn't hit the threshold, but that's very far off the spirit of the discussion. So I said if you wanted to bet on that, we could, but you should just clarify first that you recognize that Trump's claim was a ridiculous lie.

At the end of the day, I signed off(multiple times) on the initial bet YOU proposed, and you didn't. Lie some more, Jackie.

Lead spelled out the bet. I wanted to clarify first. I'm not lying at all. The thread is still available to view. You knew that you would lose and were looking for an escape, just like you did in this thread.
 
Okay, and he was then banned, correct?



Deleted by the moderators, of course.



It doesn't because he was banned. Meanwhile, you exclusively post here following Fawlty around and shit talking (including making up stories about how he fucks breakfast foods?) and making posts about Homer's personal life, ex-wife, and kids and are, of course, not infracted. So I honestly can't think of a poster who more embodies what we are talking about in inconsistent moderation than you.



Yes, and I was the TS on that thread. It was a photo that was being shared in every major newspaper in the country. Yet whiny pedants immediately got out their rule books, started mashing the report button despite the OP being clearly outside of what the rules intended to censor, got the photo deleted, and are now whining that I wasn't carded for it.


I wouldn't go so far as to say it was clearly outside of what the rules intended to censor.

The rule as written doesn't make any sort of reference to the context and I'd assume they even predate the WR and political posting in general.

I wouldn't say that photo is something clearly allowed by the rules but I can understand that the national context of the photo would allow them to let it go.
 
Okay, and he was then banned, correct?
Not permanently.

Deleted by the moderators, of course.
lol

It doesn't because he was banned. Meanwhile, you exclusively post in this forum following Fawlty around and shit talking (including making up stories about how he fucks breakfast foods?) and making posts about Homer's personal life, ex-wife, and kids and are, of course, not infracted. So I honestly can't think of a poster who more embodies what we are talking about in inconsistent moderation than you.
You should contact @I WILL CUT YOU if you think I made up that story.
Homer drew first blood when he said he was "coming for my account" so don't play ignorant. You're confusing me with other posters though.
I actually was infracted recently (and it was deserved and I didn't cry like y'all do). Take off the tinfoil.
 
The thread is still available to view.

Sure is. It's up there for everyone to see me agree to the initial bet like five times, and you weaseling out of it by constantly adding stipulations and stacking the odds in your favor.
 
Not permanently.

Did the account come back? No? Yeah, that's a permanent ban.

You should contact @I WILL CUT YOU if you think I made up that story.
Homer drew first blood when he said he was "coming for my account" so don't play ignorant. You're confusing me with other posters though.
I actually was infracted recently (and it was deserved and I didn't cry like y'all do). Take off the tinfoil.

I'm sure Homer did. And then he stopped interacting with you, while you have brought your childish drama here and spent literally almost every one of your posts crying about Fawlty and Homer despite the fact that they ignore you. Get over it, guy.
 
Sure is. It's up there for everyone to see me agree to the initial bet like five times, and you weaseling out of it by constantly adding stipulations and stacking the odds in your favor.

So this is a lie. My response to Lead's offer was just one point of clarification, while you're claiming "constantly adding stipulations." And the odds were stacked in my favor from the start. I also offered your version as long as you acknowledged that we both agree that Trump was lying when he claimed that 1-3 million unauthorized immigrants voted (note that you weren't willing to bet on his claim so it's not like that's even a controversial issue).
 
Did the account come back? No? Yeah, that's a permanent ban.
A 30 day temp ban the first time.

I'm sure Homer did. And then he stopped interacting with you, while you have brought your childish drama and into the War Room on a daily basis and spent literally almost every one of your posts crying about Fawlty and Homer despite the fact that they ignore you.
This is the Lounge thread. You should stop crying. And they aren't ignoring me.
 
This'll be interesting to see if applied consistently and allowed to just go on, in the thread made whenever Ruth Bader Ginsburg passes.

It'll be a scummy shit show. But no one will get yellows from it we now know.

Oh, I wouldn't assume no-one will get yellows. Just not for posting criticism of Ginsburg or saying they are glad she's dead.
 
So this is a lie. My response to Lead's offer was just one point of clarification

Which was initially how the numbers would be clarified, to which I believe we settled, and I signed off...again...and then you had another problem with the bet, and then another, and another...

All because at the end of the day, you talked a big game, but backed out of several versions of a bet YOU proposed.
 
A 30 day temp ban the first time.


This is the Lounge thread. You should stop crying. And they aren't ignoring me.

Again, get over it.

It's astoundingly unhealthy to spend all your days rehashing internet drama from years ago just to annoy people you've never met. You were a semi-normal poster before IIRC. I mean, really, do you look at someone like Sketch and think, "oh, wow, that guy's a winner and probably has a great life! I want to be like that person!"...?
 
Again, get over it.

It's astoundingly unhealthy to spend all your days rehashing internet drama from years ago just to annoy people you've never met. You were a semi-normal poster before IIRC. I mean, really, do you look at someone like Sketch and think, "oh, wow, that guy's a winner and probably has a great life! I want to be like that person!"...?
"The mods suck! Waaaahhh!!"

<{1-11}>

And I'm pretty sure @Sketch wouldn't just stand idly by while a girl gets your drink drugged.
 
"The mods suck! Waaaahhh!!"

<{1-11}>

And I'm pretty sure @Sketch wouldn't just stand idly by while a girl gets your drink drugged.

And this is where you bring up some hysterical lie because your sad shtick is called out. You do you, man. Maybe when you're older you'll be sufficiently embarrassed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top