War Room Lounge v61: Fun Fact: 'Race Bannon' describes two different individuals in Orbit Trump

What do you prefer? Pick one from each sequential pair. Or just click all over in mockery. Whatevs.


  • Total voters
    37
Status
Not open for further replies.
That's all? You can do better.
That is all. Limbo can't actually argue very well, so he tries to save his self-esteem and image when he loses by ducking the conversation and posting empty memes and pictures.
 
Maybe it will be an annual thing. In this case, anytime someone tags me to add a poll, I let them know why I don’t.

I feel a question of such concerningness needs to be put to a poll.

I'll ask someone without Plats to ask you to do it.
 
This reminds me of a debate about Brexit/European nationalism I listened to a while back.

"We need to stop calling them racists and start listening to their actual concerns."

"What are their actual concerns?"

"They feel like they're becoming minorities in their own countries."

"Oh. Well I hate to break this to you..."
There's racists in every group, one of the major concerns that led to nationalism and Brexit is that immigrants were being let into those countries who had no loyalty to the country's laws.

This was a really bad policy and it inflamed people, and yes, a lot of people improperly chalked it up to the race of the immigrants instead of the fact that they didn't respect the legal system.
 
Good. Just remember, that's all you'll ever be able to do. Little cowardly comments behind my back to other people and meme pictures, because when you tried to argue your point of view, you got burned. Permanently.

I cucked you for life.
 
What's happened to this thread is a good illustration of why putting EG on ignore was the right move, though I'll let it ride a little bit more.
 
Good. Just remember, that's all you'll ever be able to say to do. Little cowardly comments behind my back to other people and meme pictures, because when you tried to argue your point of view, you got burned. Permanently.
Bro, you tagged me lol

Cuckoo cuckoo cuckoo
 
What's happened to this thread is a good illustration of why putting EG on ignore was the right move, though I'll let it ride a little bit more.
I'm pretty pleased about this development tbh imo
 
Is that how he got dubs?

No. He had dubs earlier today and yesterday or before I think.

He was yellow as TS of his thread. Not sure if that was a single card or dubs at that point tho
 
Bro, you tagged me lol

Cuckoo cuckoo cuckoo
Wrong, doofus, I saw you talking about me in the thread from August 4th when I hadn't even posted here in a long time.

See what happens when you try to actually make any point to me? You get debunked instantly. Remember, the only thing you're allowed to do is post little meme pictures then talk behind my back. Now get back to doing it.
 
Wrong, doofus, I saw you talking about me in the thread from August 4th when I hadn't even posted here in a long time.

See what happens when you try to actually make any point to me? You get debunked instantly. Remember, the only thing you're allowed to do is post little meme pictures then talk behind my back. Now get back to doing it.
"Hey Pete you're a big ol meanie and i'm the boogeyman"
"Wat"
"Leave me alone!"
 
I'm pretty pleased about this development tbh imo
Oh, and @Jack V Savage put me on ignore because I showed him the proper definition of ad hominem (he admitted I corrected him), showed him the proper definition of the term "corruption" when he tried to claim Hillary Clinton wasn't corrupt (he ran from that and started trying to reply without quoting me), then he tried to cite a study on something-like vote rigging, I looked over the paper, saw that he didn't know what he was talking about, asked him how sure he was that he understood the argument, and he ran away permanently.

He now tries to lie about it and claim I'm a troll. I just repeatedly dismantled his points. And like I said, I have a very good memory, I know what I did to each of you.
 
"Hey Pete you're a big ol meanie and i'm the boogeyman"
"Wat"
"Leave me alone!"
See how you had to abandon your own point and try to run to something else? That's what happens when you get too close to the boogeyman. :)
 
Oh, and @Jack V Savage put me on ignore because I showed him the proper definition of ad hominem (he admitted I corrected him), showed him the proper definition of the term "corruption" when he tried to claim Hillary Clinton wasn't corrupt (he ran from that and started trying to reply without quoting me), then he tried to cite a study on something-like vote rigging, I looked over the paper, saw that he didn't know what he was talking about, asked him how sure he was that he understood the argument, and he ran away permanently.

He now tries to lie about it and claim I'm a troll. I just repeatedly dismantled his points. And like I said, I have a very good memory, I know what I did to each of you.
Sounds real legit there, Mr. Cuckoo Clock lol
 
Oh, and @Jack V Savage put me on ignore because I showed him the proper definition of ad hominem (he admitted I corrected him), showed him the proper definition of the term "corruption" when he tried to claim Hillary Clinton wasn't corrupt (he ran from that and started trying to reply without quoting me), then he tried to cite a study on something-like vote rigging, I looked over the paper, saw that he didn't know what he was talking about, asked him how sure he was that he understood the argument, and he ran away permanently.

He now tries to lie about it and claim I'm a troll. I just repeatedly dismantled his points. And like I said, I have a very good memory, I know what I did to each of you.
Could you please link us to the exchange with Jack V Savage? I am interested.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top