- Joined
- Aug 29, 2007
- Messages
- 15,127
- Reaction score
- 3,804
I can't say to what extent the roots of religion have explanatory power (frankly, I don't think religion is really that much of a factor tbh), but the self-validation complex that exists on the right is something to reckon with and behold: that a position is inherently honest and meritorious by mere fact that they or someone like them holds it.
Also, I actually take some issue with the statement "Evangelicals are particularly dishonest" because it's a spurious statement that implies a relationship between being Evangelical and being dishonest, when, in reality, it's a matter of Evangelicals being concentrated in rural and Southern communities and both of those communities being driven by racism, xenophobia, and a completely distorted view of political reality.
Religion per se? No. But he also specified evangelism and I think there's more of a point to be made there. Evangelism requires the maintenance of a much larger breach with the truth than say, cultural catholicism would. Like, catholics have to believe the pope stuff but otherwise it's just a guiding principle for their lives. American evangelism has all kinds of poison drinking, snake handling, faith healing, prosperity doctrine non-sense interwoven in its fabric.