War Room Lounge V44: Backup Whores, or Back Up, Whores?

Have you ever used the services of an escort?


  • Total voters
    43
Status
Not open for further replies.
Has anyone actually seen a tornado form? Obviously it's not natural. I mean, I know the establishment will tell you something about pressure or different temperature "air masses" or whatever, but what does that even mean? No one knows! It's just goobledy-gook that the mainstream media tells you so you don't question it. So if They want a tornado in D.C., then a tornado in D.C. there shall be.
Lmao at how in this trolls head I am
 
Speaking of shitstorms, is that obnoxious, never-ending story about poop in San Fran based on anything at all? I seem to remember it starting as a story about dog poop near the Golden Gate Bridge, then it morphed into a story about human poop on sidewalks. It seems like a really strange story that is possibly the most awkward, roundabout anti-gay dog-whistle I've ever seen, but thought I'd ask.

There's some poop and pee there if you go in the wrong places. I think it's exaggerated, but there's a basis.
 
Speaking of shitstorms, is that obnoxious, never-ending story about poop in San Fran based on anything at all? I seem to remember it starting as a story about dog poop near the Golden Gate Bridge, then it morphed into a story about human poop on sidewalks. It seems like a really strange story that is possibly the most awkward, roundabout anti-gay dog-whistle I've ever seen, but thought I'd ask.
https://sf.curbed.com/2019/4/23/18511865/sf-poop-human-waste-map-forbes-dpw-dog

tl;dr: the numbers are inflated because they don't distinguish between human and dog feces, but the damage is done.
 
There's some poop and pee there if you go in the wrong places. I think it's exaggerated, but there's a basis.

Do you think it turned into a self-fulfilling prophecy?

Have they done a study on poop tourism? I'd be lying if I said I wouldn't be tempted to take a street poop while in San Fran to immerse myself in the local culture. When in Rome, etc.
 
Do you think it turned into a self-fulfilling prophecy?

Have they done a study on poop tourism? I'd be lying if I said I wouldn't be tempted to take a street poop while in San Fran to immerse myself in the local culture. When in Rome, etc.

No doubt that it's not as frowned upon in the homeless community as the rest of us would like for it to be. We really need to address the housing shortage.
 
Do you think it turned into a self-fulfilling prophecy?

Have they done a study on poop tourism? I'd be lying if I said I wouldn't be tempted to take a street poop while in San Fran to immerse myself in the local culture. When in Rome, etc.
I've read that the ancient Californians had these things called Fecetoriums (pronounced with a hard 'c'), where people would gather in large numbers and expel their intestinal waste. It was a social status thing. So maybe this is deeper in the culture than modern man suspects.
 
@Jack V Savage

Pop quiz, hot shot. Would you rather spend 20 minutes picking up street poops or 40 minutes watching two entire episodes of Full House?
 
Where it falls apart is the definition of "need" in this scenario. It's a problem in that we use the same word for multiple degrees of severity for the same thing.

An infant could conceivably live without their parents, say they were raised by wolves. It's a fantastic example, but it could conceivably happen. Where is the mother in the equation? Any caretaker is enough to fulfill the role, the mother is not a critical factor when considering need.

Compare this to a human fetus in the womb. The mother is inextricably linked to the viability of the fetus, at least until the point of fetal viability. A fetus could not survive without the direct consent of the biological mother to continue the pregnancy. Until that viable point, the fetus is an element of the mother, totally dependent on reaching that point in order to survive independently.

This is why pro choice people who are willing to restrict abortion often stop at fetal viability as a red line. Before that, they're completely an element of the mother, completely discrete from even an infant which has autonomy beyond that of leeching nutrients from a host. Babies have an immense amount of independence if you really think about it.
Which also explains why modern conservatives love fetuses and hate babies. Well, poor babies anyway.
 
Speaking of shitstorms, is that obnoxious, never-ending story about poop in San Fran based on anything at all? I seem to remember it starting as a story about dog poop near the Golden Gate Bridge, then it morphed into a story about human poop on sidewalks. It seems like a really strange story that is possibly the most awkward, roundabout anti-gay dog-whistle I've ever seen, but thought I'd ask.
Dude, all dogs are a little gay, I can’t believe people care in this day and age.
 
Which also explains why modern conservatives love fetuses and hate babies. Well, poor babies anyway.
relevant
yi7vgqzr58z21.png
 
@Jack V Savage

Pop quiz, hot shot. Would you rather spend 20 minutes picking up street poops or 40 minutes watching two entire episodes of Full House?

You picked the best possible show for this question.

BTW, feces in cities used to be a much, much bigger problem than it is now.

poop.png


2.5 million lbs a day in NYC.

Dead horses were a problem, too.
 
I knew there was just no way that Tom Hanks wouldn't raise a good kid
 
You picked the best possible show for this question.

As in, because it's so bad? I hope that's what you mean. The only show I hate more than Full House is the Big Bang Theory.

Although I only picked it because it's iconically set in San Francisco.

BTW, feces in cities used to be a much, much bigger problem than it is now.

poop.png


Dead horses were a problem, too.

Where is that? Yeah, olden times sound just awful.
 
Man, people really don't appreciate how good we have it these days.

horsecarcassnewyork1900.jpg
 
Which also explains why modern conservatives love fetuses and hate babies. Well, poor babies anyway.

Why do folks continually make these blanket statements about folks they disagree with? Do you honestly think this is even remotely true for all "modern conservatives"?

It's like you can't even acknowledge the good anyone does and immediately go for the most negative thing you can think of . . .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top