• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

WAR ROOM LOUNGE V22: Cult 45

Status
Not open for further replies.
That's overly simplified, but yes. It would be more accurate to that an adult enjoys full rights and privileges of personhood, a child enjoys less and a newborn baby less than that. Privileges can be broadly defined, but think of things along the lines of free will, communication, consent, responsibility, etc.
Ok, and "right to life" varies accordingly? So a fully-grown adult has more of a "right to life" than a teen, who has more of a right to life than a child?
 
LOL "shameless" says the guy who got banned for revealing personal information about people and then berated the mod who reinstated him because he banned an unstable troll.
Wait, you're telling me that Mr. Upstanding Morals tried to dox someone? I'm shocked!
 
Ok, and "right to life" varies accordingly? So a fully-grown adult has more of a "right to life" than a teen, who has more of a right to life than a child?
No, I would say that once a fetus hits 24 weeks and is hypothetically capable of living outside of the womb, they have a right to life that carries on thru the rest of their natural lives.
 
No, I would say that once a fetus hits 24 weeks and is hypothetically capable of living outside of the womb, they have a right to life that carries on thru the rest of their natural lives.
So should abortion be banned at that point?
 
No, I would say that once a fetus hits 24 weeks and is hypothetically capable of living outside of the womb, they have a right to life that carries on thru the rest of their natural lives.
So abortion at or after 24 weeks should be banned?
 
LOL "shameless" says the guy who got banned for revealing personal information about people and then berated the mod who reinstated him because he banned an unstable troll.
Wait...are you saying Fawlty has been banned for revealing personal information about people?
 
From an argument of personhood, it's justifiable. Hence, most sates do not allow abortions past 20 weeks.
Of course, there should be room for exceptions, and they should be private between patients and doctors.
I thought you were saying that a 24-week fetus has the same right to life as an infant. Now you're saying that right to life is not the same, not absolute?
 
I thought you were saying that a 24-week fetus has the same right to life as an infant. Now you're saying that right to life is not the same, not absolute?
How did you come to that conclusion from what I wrote?
 
Now you guys understand why I correct all those stupid memes?

This mother fucker has the war room meme thread plastered on his van.

Bad information needs to be countered everywhere.
 
Last edited:
Now you guys understand why I correct all those stupid memes?

This mother fucker has the war room meme thread plastered on his van.

Bad information needs to be countered everywhere.
I figured Cint drove a van...
But really got convinced he's asian
 
Star Wars is finaly happening

https://www.foxnews.com/tech/us-war...-hOGE6aldjxCEkUv83CkOgQxyP2WmBYHm_HXE4ZsHkCcw
A U.S. Navy warship has shot down a medium-range ballistic missile in space in the latest successful test of the military’s advanced interceptor technology.

Sailors aboard the USS John Finn intercepted the missile target using a Standard Missile-3 (SM-3) Block IIA missile during the test off the west coast of Hawaii, the Pentagon’s Missile Defense Agency said Friday.

The missile is designed to shoot down enemy intercontinental ballistic missiles should they ever be fired at the U.S. SM-3 interceptors destroy incoming ballistic missiles in space using nothing more than “sheer impact,” like hitting a 10-ton truck traveling at 600 mph, according to defense company Raytheon, who makes the interceptor missile for the joint U.S.-Japanese project.
 
Was @HomerThompson banned? He had multiple bets outstanding.

giphy.gif
 
How did you come to that conclusion from what I wrote?
Ordinarily a "right to life" is inalienable unless that person commits a heinous crime. So maybe you didn't mean to write "right to life".
 
When Afeni Shakur was pregnant with her son Tupac she was actually behind bars and on trial for her activities with the Black Panthers...which was deemed a terrorist orgnaization.

She was facing 300yrs and got it reduced all the way down to 0. My one question is...how? They were not cutting black panthers any slack. She would have had to cooperate in some way. Government informant perhaps?

Also, Tupac's name wasn't actually Tupac.

Everything is a lie.
 
When Afeni Shakur was pregnant with her son Tupac she was actually behind bars and on trial for her activities with the Black Panthers...which was deemed a terrorist orgnaization.

She was facing 300yrs and got it reduced all the way down to 0. My one question is...how? They were not cutting black panthers any slack. She would have had to cooperate in some way. Government informant perhaps?

Also, Tupac's name wasn't actually Tupac.

Everything is a lie.
LavishGroundedGrayfox-max-1mb.gif
 
On the neverending topic of right-wing hysteria and anti-logic, here is a reply from last night that a forum right-winger made in response to my explaining to another poster why NoDak's citation of murder rates per capita were methodologically adjusted for populations sizes.
This is what I was referrong tto.

I'm done with black people like you. You'll happily bathe in other black people's blood just to stick it to the white man.

You're completely uninterested in addressing the problems in you rown community which are many and far reaching. Far too interested in deflecting blame.

Disgusting little racist troll.

Literally, this was in response to my defending a statistical metric as being methodologically sound. I wasn't making any political statement other than explaining the statistic and co-signing NoDak's point that white-on-white crime rates were not inflated by the inclusion of Hispanic offenders into "white" (the claim made by this poster) since the DOJ classifies Hispanics as a different category in this study.

@Fawlty how did you lose a debate to this guy?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top