- Joined
- Nov 13, 2009
- Messages
- 46,094
- Reaction score
- 13,514
I prefer the Sexy Sax Man
I watch this at least once a year. The food court scene is hilarious where he turns the crowd on the security guard and they start booing
I prefer the Sexy Sax Man
Not liking George Michael should illicit any other response???I watch this at least once a year. The food court scene is hilarious where he turns the crowd on the security guard and they start booing
I can't say I do.
Is Mia Khalifa is still a big deal? I remember for a time I heard about her non-stop. Decent face but the tit job was too much and I can't say I like the Orientalist vibe in her case.
That sounds really interesting actually, at the least the setting. I've thought a Muslim equivalent along the lines of what we talked about in some other thread, intentional communities of religious conservatives based around self reliant and sustainable living, would be a neat premise. Something similar to Rojava in the sense of it popping up in the context of the break down of central state power and sandwiched between hostile nation states. But I imagined it more of a series of slice of life vignettes rather than a detective story.
I saw a couple dudes practicing their softball pitching in the park the other day.
![]()
Maybe I just expect enforcement of the no trolling and flaming rules.
Gee whiz, what a surprise. They haven't even found the money missing from the Inauguration Committee yet, AFAIK. The US must really be a shithole for so much blatant corruption in such a short time by so many in one "family" to go unpunished.@tonni
Remember that thread where someone was bragging about their monthly contributions to Trump's campaign? Feel free to send them this:
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/28/com...paign-of-masking-170-million-in-spending.html
KEY POINTS
- President Donald Trump’s reelection campaign violated the law by masking millions in spending, a nonprofit democracy group alleged in a complaint filed with the Federal Election Commission on Tuesday.
- The Campaign Legal Center said in the 81-page filing that the president’s reelection campaign and campaign committee hid $170 million in spending to major vendors as well as family members and associates by diverting the money through firms headed by Brad Parscale, who was replaced as campaign manager earlier this month, as well as other senior campaign officials.
- The nonprofit alleged that the campaign effectively laundered money in order to hide payments to contractors and advisors, including the maker of a campaign app, as well as Lara Trump, the president’s daughter-in-law, and Kimberly Guilfoyle, a former Fox News host who is dating the president’s son Donald Trump Jr.
The board would be empty!
Maybe I just expect enforcement of the no trolling and flaming rules.
Holy shit man. I am so sorry to hear that.My dad has covid and now I may have to get retested. God dammit.
Shit man take careMy dad has covid and now I may have to get retested. God dammit.
I wouldn't say anything has shocked me given my knowledge of those other analyses, but the narrative is much more human. The author makes more of an effort than I've seen anywhere else to actually enter the minds of right-leaning people (Louisianans, in this case) and sketch out the logic and emotion that animate them. I also really like that she centres her questioning around the What's the Matter with Kansas? problem applied specifically to environmental issues, since the Bayou people she talks to are very conscious of the environmental destruction around them but very resistant to the obvious culprit (industry) and solutions (regulation).Without looking too much into it, I feel like I've read a bunch of other books and essays dedicated to decoding the right wing mind. Anything particularly revealing in this book?
If I had someone to play catch with I’d likely grab another mitt but I don’t even have a pitch back to play with
Holy shit man. I am so sorry to hear that.
Shit man take care
Thanks, buds. My dad just had two surgeries and my mom beat cancer last year, they are two tough fuckers but I'm still a bit worried.
Thanks, I appreciate the breakdown. When you finish it, please share your thoughts.I wouldn't say anything has shocked me given my knowledge of those other analyses, but the narrative is much more human. The author makes more of an effort than I've seen anywhere else to actually enter the minds of right-leaning people (Louisianans, in this case) and sketch out the logic and emotion that animate them. I also really like that she centres her questioning around the What's the Matter with Kansas? problem applied specifically to environmental issues, since the Bayou people she talks to are very conscious of the environmental destruction around them but very resistant to the obvious culprit (industry) and solutions (regulation).
Overall it's much less mechanical and at least as insightful as the more scientific approaches, and undeniably produced in good faith. I think if you wanted to step back from factual disagreement and actually have a conversation about problematic values with the "small government, self-sufficiency" right, this is as good a starting place as any.