- Joined
- May 20, 2016
- Messages
- 34,432
- Reaction score
- 15,875
"Likes" have to be one of the dumbest things added to this site in recent memory.
"Likes" have to be one of the dumbest things added to this site in recent memory.
I know you like to lie and say you're over 30, but everyone knows you're young. My account was around over four years before yours. Back then, likes weren't even a thing.
I know you like to lie and say you're over 30, but everyone knows you're young. My account was around over four years before yours. Back then, likes weren't even a thing.
"Likes" have to be one of the dumbest things added to this site in recent memory.
I know you like to lie and say you're over 30, but everyone knows you're young. My account was around over four years before yours. Back then, likes weren't even a thing.
Sports Bar NFL thread, rag on Marky and the Cowboys.... instant.Also, the ratios are different in different forums. If you post, like, "Fedor was rad" early in a popular HW thread, you can get 100 likes.
You are even less bright than I thought.Likes weren't a thing when I made my account either.
Any more deflections for your shitty poorly likely account?
According to @Rational Poster, your account is "shitty" because you have a low likes/posts ratio.Also, the ratios are different in different forums. If you post, like, "Fedor was rad" early in a popular HW thread, you can get 100 likes.
You are even less bright than I thought.
When were likes created? Late 2015? Your account is from late 2013. So 60% of the time your account has existed, the "like" feature has been available.
My account is nine years old. So likes were only available for 33% of the time my account has existed.
@Imbrued Esculence is one of the best posters around but his like ratio is pretty low. That's partly because his account is old.
There are exceptions. Some older posters troll for likes with gifs and tribalist appeals.
People like myself and @Pupi I think also have long period where we didn't post. There was at least like 2 years starting somewhere around 2015 that I didn't post almost anything.You are even less bright than I thought.
When were likes created? Late 2015? Your account is from late 2013. So 60% of the time your account has existed, the "like" feature has been available.
My account is nine years old. So likes were only available for 33% of the time my account has existed.
@Imbrued Esculence is one of the best posters around but his like ratio is pretty low. That's partly because his account is old.
There are exceptions. Some older posters troll for likes with gifs and tribalist appeals.
According to @Rational Poster, your account is "shitty" because you had a low likes/posts ratio.
"Likes" have to be one of the dumbest things added to this site in recent memory.
People like myself and @Pupi I think also have long period where we didn't post. There was at least like 2 years starting somewhere around 2015 that I didn't post almost anything.
I didn't say anything about the ratio.
If you don't have 20k likes by now you just suck, sorry.
I thought these two posts were from different people initially for some reason.@Pupi doesn't suck though.
I think we both slowed down at least around the time the Plats got semi-purged.Yeah, I stopped actively posting on sherdog around 2012 and I restarted some time in the last 6-8 months. The post-to-like ratio pwn is childish and silly since it assumes that the ones who have higher likes have more access to Truth and creativity instead of displaying groupthink and having a "reputation" in certain sub-forums.
Yeah, I stopped actively posting on sherdog around 2012 and I restarted some time in the last 6-8 months. The post-to-like ratio pwn is childish and silly since it assumes that the ones who have higher likes have more access to Truth and creativity instead of displaying groupthink and having a "reputation" in certain sub-forums.
*Looks at Trostky's posts and like amountsThe "pwn" is extremely childish, but the function is good.
Also, for the record, it was added in late 2016, not late 2015.