War Room Lounge v106: Your thread was moved. That's basically the same as nazi book burnings.

[HunterSdVa29]

Yeah, I don't expect you to be able to understand that point.

Hahahahahahah

Condescension and elitism suits you so well
keep it up, please

The level of arrogance is astounding

 

[Jack V Savage]

Hahahahahahah

Condescension and elitism suits you so well
keep it up, please

The level of arrogance is astounding

Your position is that you're basically a prediction God and that your own personal experience gives you special insight into election odds. Mine is that stuff like science and data-collection is more useful. Yours is the more-arrogant view, but, again, the kind of person who holds your positions is exactly the kind of person who is unable to understand a critique of them.

 

[PolishHeadlock2]

 

[HunterSdVa29]

Your position is that you're basically a prediction God and that your own personal experience gives you special insight into election odds. Mine is that stuff like science and data-collection is more useful. Yours is the more-arrogant view, but, again, the kind of person who holds your positions is exactly the kind of person who is unable to understand a critique of them.

You love strawmans, don't you? I've never seen someone commit so many logical fallacies, while being intelligent, so it must be on purpose

You're arrogant b/c you erroneously assume the intelligence of others, like they don't understand the concept of objective/subjective, etc..

It someone doesn't agree with you, its universally b/c they don't understand the issue.

Again, carry on, as you were. Keep feigning that sense of superiority, it's working wonders

 

[Gregolian]

I found the two guys that write Biden’s speeches

 

[Fawlty]

I'm an idiot, you're totally right

THAT MUST BE IT

Seriously, don't stop, you are the most unintentionally hilarious poster on any forum, ever. No hyperbole

When you "call it," you call it like the guy in a sports bar "called it," if that makes sense. You could impress smarter people by pointing out some analysis of yours (or of other people) that led you to your conclusions. What were your assumptions? How does your prediction differ from other lines of thought? What factors are you picking up on that others overlook, or what factors do you dismiss that others wrongfully think are important? That sort of thing. You're educated, you know what I mean.

If a person "calls" all 50 states, were they lucky or were they sharp? That depends on their analysis. (and often we can't even make that distinction with confidence)

 

[Sketch]

You love strawmans, don't you? I've never seen someone commit so many logical fallacies, while being intelligent, so it must be on purpose

You're arrogant b/c you erroneously assume the intelligence of others, like they don't understand the concept of objective/subjective, etc..

It someone doesn't agree with you, its universally b/c they don't understand the issue.

Again, carry on, as you were. Keep feigning that sense of superiority, it's working wonders

He’s a troll.

 

[Jack V Savage]

You love strawmans, don't you? I've never seen someone commit so many logical fallacies, while being intelligent, so it must be on purpose

You're arrogant b/c you erroneously assume the intelligence of others, like they don't understand the concept of objective/subjective, etc..

It someone doesn't agree with you, its universally b/c they don't understand the issue.

Again, carry on, as you were. Keep feigning that sense of superiority, it's working wonders

There's no strawman, and no logical fallacies (and no logical argument to even apply them to, for that matter). And since you're still sore over a different discussion, let me quote you:

"objectively your HS scores should be the main if not sole criteria for admitting into colleges"

You can pretend to giggle like a schoolgirl, but the fact is that that statement suggests that you don't understand what "objectively" means.

 

[HunterSdVa29]

When you "call it," you call it like the guy in a sports bar "called it," if that makes sense. You could impress smarter people by pointing out some analysis of yours (or of other people) that led you to your conclusions. What were your assumptions? How does your prediction differ from other lines of thought? What factors are you picking up on that others overlook, or what factors do you dismiss that others wrongfully think are important? That sort of thing. You're educated, you know what I mean.

If a person "calls" all 50 states, were they lucky or were they sharp? That depends on their analysis.

Impress smarter people?

Here? on Sherdog?

hahahahahahahhahh

 

[Trotsky]

worked for the current one, and hes def senile, among other things...

Unfortunately the standards to which the left and right are held are wildly disparate. And it's directly proportionate to how left you are, it seems. A Bernie Sanders or Jeremy Corbyn will be held to much higher standards than centrist liberals, who will be held to higher standards than centrist conservatives, who will be held to higher standards than far-right types, etc. Think of the sorts of gaffes that sunk campaigns like Dukakis and Dean.

So while being a clearly senile gaffe monster will not crush Biden as it would crush Sanders (because it won't be insisted upon by the liberal media as it would for Sanders), it still will not be given as much leeway at Trump (because it will be harped on by the conservative media, unlike for Trump).

 

[Fawlty]

Impress smarter people?

Here? on Sherdog?

hahahahahahahhahh

Substitute any description you want. But the question is still there. You "call it" like the sports bar guy "calls it."

Prove me wrong, I like being wrong about stuff like this.

 

[HunterSdVa29]

Man today is a great day. Refreshing, like a Fresca

Prove you wrong hahahahahahahah
Yes, sir!

 

[Fawlty]

Man today is a great day. Refreshing, like a Fresca

This is like when Jocko Willink stubs his toe and says "good!"

 

[Jack V Savage]

This is like when Jocko Willink stubs his toe and says "good!"

Or this:

 

[Fawlty]

I don't think people appreciate the size of Nate Silver's balls.

He makes a model, goes with it, and eats shit when he's wrong. And he's wrong somewhat often. He does it in such a way that his flaws are exposed. He doesn't "call it," he shows his work.

 

[Gregolian]

Coolest non-main character but potential future ally in the whole series

 

[Sketch]

This is such a shit take. Biden won't even attempt to do the things Bernie would. He cuts SS if elected. Guaranteed.

I wonder if you are starting to realize he is not only a troll, but a paid troll. Look at his post. Bernie and Biden would be the same. That is cartoonish levels of posting.

 

[Cajun]

Lol

 

[Fawlty]

Prove you wrong hahahahahahahah
Yes, sir!

"Yeah playa that's gonna be a no from me dog but you go boy yeah sure okay haha"

deflect cetera,

 

[HunterSdVa29]

"Yeah playa that's gonna be a no from me dog but you go boy yeah sure okay haha"

deflect cetera,

it keeps getting funnier tbh
carry on, as you were