War Room Lounge Thread v120: My threads are in the 93rd percentile. Ask my kids.

[Prokofievian]

Yea, I didn't realize how easy it would be to cheat. We only can have an honor system on that. It would be cool if these sites could pick up on that stuff and wouldn't put it past this one with all the cool features it has. Even if someone is a dick, it's round robin so everyone will get a few games in and get to have some fun.

All the games are reviewable so if someone is cheating, it will be pretty easy to tell.

 

[tonni]

Funny, but I'm the guy that would pretend 100% to be going as hard as I could, and be theatrical about it, and let the child think they really won so they can feel good about themselves.

I would give them hope then demolish them at the very end.

 

[Lead]

All the games are reviewable so if someone is cheating, it will be pretty easy to tell.

Good to know. Now join the tournament bud

 

[Amerikuracana]

That sucks. Maybe you can license the site to another attorney. That might get you around the "no sharing legal fees with non-lawyers" hurdle.

I'm considering that. I need to look into what I should ask for a as a licensing fee. I've also considered just going to work at a firm using the site to generate referrals both for the firm, and then also referrals out for the firm to collect on. I guess I could offer up a 6 month trial period to see if it would be worth it for the firm to keep me and my site on. After I realized I couldn't get paid for the referrals I was creating I kind of backed off daily administering of the site and its social media pages. Without me even being there for a week at a time, the page is still getting likes, messages, and traffic.

 

[Jesus H. Sherdog]

White guy in Jordan's era:

White guy in Lebron's era:

Spoiler

I'm aware Griffin is bi-racial, but the point stands.

ummm... John Stockton is a way better player than Blake Griffin lmao. Shoulda went with Dirk, of course that hurts your point because he beat James when Bron had a superteam. Lmao at thinking muscles alone make you a better basketball player. No wonder you’re a Lebron fan.

@A.C. STL police just complained to the media that the "rat" AG holds them to higher standards than "standard felons."

I lol'd. These morons are nearing self-reflection as they yearn for being held to the standards of criminals.

Sounds facepalmy. Got an article or tweet or something? My google search came up empty. Edit: just saw your later post.

 

[JDragon]

His dad told me he spent weeks getting him to not try and impregnate the Queen with the little horses.

 

[Gandhi]

Yea, I didn't realize how easy it would be to cheat. We only can have an honor system on that. It would be cool if these sites could pick up on that stuff and wouldn't put it past this one with all the cool features it has. Even if someone is a dick, it's round robin so everyone will get a few games in and get to have some fun.

There are algorithms to detect someone mimicking computer AIs and boot you from cheating, I’m sure this site has it, but if you add a couple of your own random moves, you could kind of/ mostly stick to the PC algorithm and mostly likely not get caught.

Calling it out now is probably the best way to prevent it. Hopefully self shame works.

 

[LMP]

@Amerikuracana joining? If it’s really a matter of needing one to drop out I can. Still have yet to get a checkmate. My two wins have come by just surviving until the other guy ran out his 10 minutes

If anyone is dropping it is me damn it. I only joined to keep The Deep State from banning me. @Lead sent me a PM stating so. I haven't played in a really long time. I'll be handing out w's the whole tournament.

 

[helltoupee]

Got some CTers who think both parties are the same in a tizzy about this in another thread, but there's a lot of interesting stuff in this study that is beyond the scope of that discussion:

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3288862

LOL. The little bitch has to run back to his support group pleading for help.

I like how you label anyone who disagrees with you as a "CTer".

Let's see, I am a "CTer" because I called you out on your absolute declaration that "... ...left and right donors don't agree on anything", after you just called someone a 'stoned out kook' for suggesting that there is some overlap between both parties. NOBODY SAID THAT "BOTH PARTIES ARE THE SAME", that was a strawman you introduced when you ran out of argument. Democrats and Republicans often donate to both parties in an effort to hedge their bets. There is nothing controversial or CT about that statement whatsoever. So now on top of you being king lame, you are a liar as well. You're just mad that someone even insinuated that there are bad actors in both parties, or that there is a class of donors who transcend party politics.

Regardless of how much you want to deflect about what you actually meant, or how stoned Jackie Blue is, or what a CTer I am, I am going to keep hammering you on the reality that you made a factually incorrect statement and like usual, did it while looking down your nose at someone.

I know this snobbish little act of yours is very important to you since we both realize you don't have the balls to act like that to people's faces, but if you want to put yourself out there as some quasi-intellectual bully who passive-aggressively insults people in a patronizing manner - then you better expect that people are going to call you out for it.

Just a little tip for the future: if you want people to A) not take your words at face value and B) listen to your backpeddling 'nuance', maybe dial back the condescending behavior. Maybe try to conduct yourself as if you were having a real life conversation instead of speaking down to people from the safety of your basement.

 

[Jack V Savage]

LOL. The little bitch has to run back to his support group pleading for help.

I like how you label anyone who disagrees with you as a "CTer".

Let's see, I am a "CTer" because I called you out on your absolute declaration that "... ...left and right donors don't agree on anything", after you just called someone a 'stoned out kook' for suggesting that there is some overlap between both parties. NOBODY SAID THAT "BOTH PARTIES ARE THE SAME", that was a strawman you introduced when you ran out of argument. Democrats and Republicans often donate to both parties in an effort to hedge their bets. There is nothing controversial or CT about that statement whatsoever. So now on top of you being king lame, you are a liar as well.

Regardless of how much you want to deflect about what you actually meant, or how stoned Jackie Blue is, or what a CTer I am, I am going to keep hammering you on the reality that you made a factually incorrect statement and like usual, did it while looking down your nose at someone.

I know this snobbish little act of yours is very important to you since we both realize you don't have the balls to act like that to people's faces, but if you want to put yourself out there as some quasi-intellectual bully who passive-aggressively insults people in a patronizing manner - then you better expect that people are going to call you out for it.

Just a little tip for the future: if you want people to A) not take your words at face value and B) listen to your backpeddling 'nuance', maybe dial back the condescending behavior. Maybe try to conduct yourself as if you were having a real life conversation instead of speaking down to people from the safety of your basement.

Any comment on the findings or my interpretation of them?

 

[Lead]

There are algorithms to detect someone mimicking computer AIs and boot you from cheating, I’m sure this site has it, but if you add a couple of your own random moves, you could kind of/ mostly stick to the PC algorithm and mostly likely not get caught.

Calling it out now is probably the best way to prevent it. Hopefully self shame works.

Good to know.

Accept the tournament invite man

 

[tonni]

There are algorithms to detect someone mimicking computer AIs and boot you from cheating, I’m sure this site has it, but if you add a couple of your own random moves, you could kind of/ mostly stick to the PC algorithm and mostly likely not get caught.

Calling it out now is probably the best way to prevent it. Hopefully self shame works.

Same with poker, only in Texas hold em the bots are mainly to farm low stakes.

There's algortims that detect collusion too.

 

[JDragon]

If anyone is dropping it is me damn it. I only joined to keep The Deep State from banning me. @Lead sent me a PM stating so. I haven't played in a really long time. I'll be handing out w's the whole tournament.

PM content is confidential. I wish ban

 

[Joe]

Whoa that fox interview with bidens accuser is canceled

 

[LMP]

PM content is confidential. I wish ban

@Lead can neither confirm or deny the existence of this alleged PM.

 

[Joe]

@Lead am i crazy or can I no longer see who is viewing a thread

 

[nac386]

White guy in Jordan's era:

White guy in Lebron's era:

Spoiler

I'm aware Griffin is bi-racial, but the point stands.

Stockton is by far the greater player. He’s one of the 50 greatest players of all time, leads the NBA all time lost in assists and steals.

There’s also a 6’9 white guy from Jordan’s era that was fairly good that you may have heard of.

 

[HockeyBjj]

@Lowmanproblems play me in chess. We can be like, the play in game

 

[My Spot]

LOL. The little bitch has to run back to his support group pleading for help.

I like how you label anyone who disagrees with you as a "CTer".

Let's see, I am a "CTer" because I called you out on your absolute declaration that "... ...left and right donors don't agree on anything", after you just called someone a 'stoned out kook' for suggesting that there is some overlap between both parties. NOBODY SAID THAT "BOTH PARTIES ARE THE SAME", that was a strawman you introduced when you ran out of argument. Democrats and Republicans often donate to both parties in an effort to hedge their bets. There is nothing controversial or CT about that statement whatsoever. So now on top of you being king lame, you are a liar as well. You're just mad that someone even insinuated that there are bad actors in both parties, or that there is a class of donors who transcend party politics.

Regardless of how much you want to deflect about what you actually meant, or how stoned Jackie Blue is, or what a CTer I am, I am going to keep hammering you on the reality that you made a factually incorrect statement and like usual, did it while looking down your nose at someone.

I know this snobbish little act of yours is very important to you since we both realize you don't have the balls to act like that to people's faces, but if you want to put yourself out there as some quasi-intellectual bully who passive-aggressively insults people in a patronizing manner - then you better expect that people are going to call you out for it.

Just a little tip for the future: if you want people to A) not take your words at face value and B) listen to your backpeddling 'nuance', maybe dial back the condescending behavior. Maybe try to conduct yourself as if you were having a real life conversation instead of speaking down to people from the safety of your basement.

Everything is a CT to Jack.

 

[My Spot]

@Lead am i crazy or can I no longer see who is viewing a thread

I can’t either.