Social War Room Lounge Thread #325: PotWR Edition

Status
Not open for further replies.
Also LOL at people liking your response as if they read it and disagree with the findings. Basically proving the results of the study. JFC you guys need to touch grass.
 
Limbo Pete said:
Yeeeah I'm gonna have to capslock my L O L at that one
Click to expand...
I'm not going to dismiss it out of hand despite the fact that I don't rate Rob that highly. It's believable enough for me, the right had become an eclectic coalition that includes many, sometimes antagonistic, factions. Plus the right are disproportionately made up of unengaged voters so it would make sense that they care less about their internal disagreements.
 
Rob Battisti said:
Did you? Do you disagree with the finding?

It’s a big study that I posted 19 minutes ago.
Click to expand...
Rob, I have made a career of reading scholarly articles, I'm very good and very fast at it.
So the question I have is, what do you think the finding actually is? In your own words. And more importantly, what do you think it means? When you say "sorry, guys", what exactly are you apologizing for?
 
Islam Imamate said:
I'm not going to dismiss it out of hand despite the fact that I don't rate Rob that highly. It's believable enough for me, the right had become an eclectic coalition that includes many, sometimes antagonistic, factions. Plus the right are disproportionately made up of unengaged voters so it would make sense that they care less about their internal disagreements.
Click to expand...
Oh it's not something that should be dismissed at all, I actually think it's pretty interesting
 
Limbo Pete said:
Rob, I have made a career of reading scholarly articles, I'm very good and very fast at it.
So the question I have is, what do you think the finding actually is? In your own words. And more importantly, what do you think it means? When you say "sorry, guys", what exactly are you apologizing for?
Click to expand...
It’s 7000+ words. You had 15 minutes max. That would take someone longer. Sure. You have a career in reading those articles. I gave a synopsis. What do you disagree with in that synopsis?
 
Rob Battisti said:
So you’re not dismissing it but you LOL’d at it?
Click to expand...
No, I lold at the tweet, and then again to a lesser extent at you. You apologized for the article in question, which is weird considering what it's about and what it concluded. That's why I asked my questions re: what you took from it. I'm not looking for a copy pasted synopsis. Again, in your own words please, what do you think the findings are, and what do they mean?
 
Islam Imamate said:
Politically unengaged voters who don't follow or understand politics and thus lean heavily towards name recognition.

Kinda like how Trump won tbh.
Click to expand...
maybe they’re fiscal conservatives and appreciate how he killed all those old people who are a net-drain on our system
 
No time now to create my own thread, anybody posting what the breaking news of a senator being arrested for trying to ask C-word Noem a question?

The arrests of opposition elected officials is crossing a big ugly line, don't you think, free speech defenders?
 
Last edited:
I looked at some of the other journals in the field. It seems still ok but...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,956
Messages
58,330,868
Members
176,002
Latest member
Shock7

Share this page

Back
Top