- Joined
- Mar 18, 2014
- Messages
- 20,345
- Reaction score
- 13,692
I thought what you posted was a joke that you made up LOL. Okay that thing definitely is not accurateIt called me a right wing shit poster
Social War Room Lounge Thread #325: PotWR Edition
- Thread starter Andy Capp
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2011
- Messages
- 61,548
- Reaction score
- 47,761
You don't think Mr Holmes is a right wing shitposter? That's about as accurate a summary of his posting as I can think of.
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2013
- Messages
- 36,429
- Reaction score
- 35,350
Well, while I'm a very big fan of individual liberty, I'm also all about a service oriented government paid for with progressive taxation
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2007
- Messages
- 37,171
- Reaction score
- 61,334
What about me being a center left libertarian?
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2011
- Messages
- 61,548
- Reaction score
- 47,761
Oh gee I'd love to see the posts fed to the AI that gave it that impression, I must've missed all of those posts of yours.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2013
- Messages
- 36,429
- Reaction score
- 35,350
I didn't even get one of those archetype categories in my analysis and tbh I'm a little disappointed
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2013
- Messages
- 23,138
- Reaction score
- 48,402
I label you a leftard shit poster. You're welcome.
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2007
- Messages
- 37,171
- Reaction score
- 61,334
Tbh I’m probably center left on more issues than you’d think.
Well, you think I’m about as right as right can be, but I’m really not.
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2011
- Messages
- 61,548
- Reaction score
- 47,761
Such as?
Definitely not though people like you are happy to enable the far right.
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2020
- Messages
- 9,050
- Reaction score
- 14,416
Yeah we all know you’re a NIMBY guy so we now know you’re firmly with California Democrats in some aspects.
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2013
- Messages
- 36,429
- Reaction score
- 35,350
Thanks man
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2007
- Messages
- 126,899
- Reaction score
- 62,407
Can't disagree with a single word, totally nailed me. You're a diamond.@fingercuffs
Poster Profile
1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis
Category Assessment Politeness Low to Medium – The poster frequently uses sarcasm, bluntness, profanity, and mockery to express frustration or criticism. Occasionally offers friendly banter or sincere engagement. Kindness Moderate – Despite a hostile tone, the poster consistently shows concern for vulnerable groups (e.g., children, minorities, women, LGBT+ individuals), and occasionally softens in one-on-one exchanges. Anger High – There is intense frustration aimed at political figures, perceived injustices, and hypocrisy. Their tone suggests personal offense taken at systemic failures. Tone Combative, sardonic, emotionally charged. At times playful, at times venomous. Empathy Medium to High – While combative, the poster shows genuine empathy when discussing children at protests, gay friends, or social injustice. Also reflects personal emotional experience (e.g., family, trauma).
2. Intelligence Estimation
- Language Use: Witty, expressive, and full of slang, satire, and hyperbole. Writes fluently and with strong stylistic variation.
- Argumentation: Passionate but not always structured. Frequently uses rhetorical questions, sarcasm, and irony. Their moral intuitions are clear, but logic may take a backseat to emotional delivery.
- Knowledge Indicators: High familiarity with US and UK politics, pop culture, religious themes, civil rights, and internet subculture. References specific events (Epstein logs, USAID, Proud Boys), indicating broad awareness.
Ideological Orientation
Left–Right Spectrum
Evidence Leaning Strong anti-Trump, anti-MAGA, anti-fascist sentiments Left Pro-LGBTQ+, anti-racist, pro-feminist sentiments Left Critical of both left and right figures when hypocritical Left-Critical Emphasis on institutional corruption, corporate exploitation, and religious abuse Left-Libertarian Concerned about cultural and economic inequality Progressive
Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum
Evidence Leaning Fiercely defends free expression, LGBTQ+ rights, and freedom from religious dogma Libertarian Rejects state overreach (e.g., ICE, police brutality, Proud Boys support) Libertarian Occasionally suggests regulation when it protects vulnerable people Left-libertarian Favors mutual respect over deference to traditional hierarchy Anti-authoritarian
Archetype Match
Summary Table
Trait Assessment Politeness Low – direct, vulgar, combative Kindness Medium – often concealed behind sarcasm Anger Level High – deeply frustrated, especially with injustice Intellectual Depth High verbal and cultural intelligence Political Leaning Strongly Progressive Left Authority Preference Libertarian / Anti-Authoritarian
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2007
- Messages
- 37,171
- Reaction score
- 61,334
Is being anti-establishment still left? It used to be. I think corporations, on the whole, should be dismantled in order to create more competition, the rich need to be taxed more and loopholes closed, EPA should be better empowered, big food should be completely destroyed and organic foods should be more available, child tax credits and parental leave should be greatly increased, more worker rights. Those are just a few.
NIMBY knows no party allegiance.
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2011
- Messages
- 61,548
- Reaction score
- 47,761
No of course not, most of the right is "anti-establishment" at this point.
Sounds like a Crunchy Conservative to me.
True but it is interesting that NIMBYs are more effective in blue states and cities.
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2006
- Messages
- 3,974
- Reaction score
- 3,784
@panamaican
Profile of the Poster1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis
| Category | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Politeness | Moderate to High. This user generally remains composed, respectful, and avoids personal insults even in the midst of disagreement. Sarcasm and occasional frustration surface, but not to the point of hostility. |
| Kindness | Moderate. Shows empathy toward vulnerable individuals (e.g., pregnant women, minors, immigrants, low-income families), and frequently argues for fairness and systemic support. Kindness is expressed through reasoned argument rather than emotional appeals. |
| Anger | Low to Moderate. User displays frustration at hypocrisy, poor argumentation, or moral inconsistency but doesn't explode into rants. Tone remains mostly level and measured. |
| Tone | Rational, deliberate, assertive. Willing to correct misinformation and walk others through their reasoning. Can be a bit exasperated at times, but rarely mean-spirited. |
| Empathy | High. Frequent concern for social systems, due process, and real-world burdens placed on people. Demonstrates moral consistency and attempts to anchor arguments in lived experiences. |
2. Intelligence Estimation
- Language Use:
Well-articulated and precise. Uses clear sentence structures and avoids jargon. Makes frequent use of analogies and logic. Rare spelling/grammar issues, often points them out in others. Communicates both legal and political concepts effectively. - Argumentation:
Strong. Builds arguments systematically, responds directly to others' points, and frequently includes counter-examples or reframing to make logical distinctions. Cites legal standards (due process, felony statutes), economic trends, and historical context. - Analytical Depth:
Very high. Balances legal insight with real-world considerations. Deconstructs ideological claims and public policies with nuance. Often highlights contradictions in opposing arguments and proposes thoughtful alternatives.
Methodical, articulate, and capable of complex reasoning. Uses legal reasoning, economic analysis, and ethical frameworks fluently. Responds with substance over style and shows deep familiarity with political, legal, and social systems.
Ideological OrientationLeft–Right Spectrum
| Evidence | Leaning |
|---|---|
| Supports abortion rights, public health, social services | Progressive Left |
| Opposes authoritarianism, ideological coercion, and moral hypocrisy | Liberal |
| Advocates civil liberties, economic realism, and evidence-based governance | Center-left to Technocratic Progressive |
| Expresses nuance about religion, welfare systems, and foreign policy | Thoughtful Center-Left |
Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum
| Evidence | Leaning |
|---|---|
| Emphasizes individual autonomy in reproductive rights, immigration, and education | Libertarian |
| Opposes surveillance and unnecessary criminalization | Libertarian |
| Supports legal due process, institutional accountability, and privacy | Libertarian |
| Argues for civil rights grounded in law, not cultural conformity | Anti-authoritarian liberalism |
Archetype Match“The Rational Liberal”
Empathetic and policy-literate, this user prefers reasoned debate to polemics. They are deeply informed about the law, governance, and economics, and aim for fairness in discussions—even with those they oppose. Grounded in secular ethics, they distrust simplistic solutions and demand intellectual integrity.
Summary Table| Trait | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Politeness | Moderate to High (measured and respectful) |
| Rudeness/Kindness | Generally kind, rarely abrasive |
| Anger Level | Low to Moderate — aimed at poor reasoning, not people |
| Intellectual Depth | Very High — legal clarity, historical grounding, practical insight |
| Political Leaning | Center-Left / Progressive |
| Authority Preference | Libertarian — strong belief in personal agency and due process |
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2006
- Messages
- 3,974
- Reaction score
- 3,784
I do. I wanted to scrape it, but it had issues, so I copy/paste a page of comments at a time (5 pages total for 100 comments) and use a program to quickly clean it (ie removes all content except for the message itself - no names, threads, times/dates etc.). Then I run it through ChatGPT.
Here you are, according to ChatGPT:
Profile of the Poster1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis
| Category | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Politeness | Moderate. Occasionally sarcastic or pointed, but avoids outright insults. Frustration is evident, but the poster generally maintains civility even in contentious threads. |
| Kindness | Moderate to High. Shows empathy toward immigrants, minorities, the working class, and politically marginalized groups. Frequently calls out racism, xenophobia, and economic unfairness. |
| Anger | Moderate. Strong frustration toward misinformation, misrepresentation, and far-right populism—especially MAGA supporters—but this is usually expressed through detailed rebuttals, not rage. |
| Tone | Assertive, informed, and exasperated. Passionate about civic discourse and fair debate. Uses dry wit and rhetorical questions, but rarely lashes out. |
| Empathy | High. Shows sustained concern for immigrants, working-class Americans, civil rights, and the consequences of political extremism. Often reframes debates around real-world outcomes for vulnerable groups. |
2. Intelligence Estimation
- Language Use:
Highly articulate. Writes in full, structured sentences. Utilizes analogies, clarifications, and summary logic. Capable of sustaining long-form debate with continuity and clarity. - Argumentation:
Strong. Tracks and challenges misrepresentations, cites data (e.g. housing markets, tariffs, immigration policy), and incorporates economic and political theory into rebuttals. Frequently re-centers discussions around context and definitions. - Analytical Depth:
High. Discusses population trends, legal theory, immigration systems, and political theory with nuance. Comfortable parsing through motives, consequences, and unintended effects of policy decisions. Willing to admit complexity or uncertainty when appropriate.
Well-informed and confident in complex discourse. The user shows strong critical thinking skills, handles ideological disagreement with structured reasoning, and holds a high standard for truth and logical consistency.
Ideological OrientationLeft–Right Spectrum
| Evidence | Leaning |
|---|---|
| Defends immigration, multiculturalism, and refugee policy | Progressive Left |
| Opposes MAGA, nationalism, and Great Replacement rhetoric | Progressive |
| Favors economic inclusion and criticizes supply-side populism | Center-left |
| Supports Bernie Sanders in primaries but accepts political pragmatism | Progressive Left with moderate pragmatist tendencies |
Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum
| Evidence | Leaning |
|---|---|
| Defends civil liberties and opposes authoritarian tendencies | Libertarian |
| Critiques government overreach and abuse of power (e.g., presidential retaliation) | Libertarian |
| Values rule of law and due process | Libertarian-leaning civic liberal |
| Opposes ideological policing and emphasizes individual freedoms | Civil libertarian ethos |
Archetype Match“The Principled Pragmatist”
Analytical, data-driven, and emotionally grounded in fairness. This user engages with ideological opponents not for sport but to challenge dangerous narratives and promote better policy. Combines moral clarity with political realism and prioritizes real-world outcomes over tribal loyalty.
Summary Table| Trait | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Politeness | Moderate (firm but not abusive) |
| Rudeness/Kindness | Often kind, with occasional sharpness in rebuttals |
| Anger Level | Moderate — aimed at misinformation and extremism |
| Intellectual Depth | High to Very High — excels in debate, policy, and framing |
| Political Leaning | Progressive Left |
| Authority Preference | Libertarian — skeptical of concentrated power, values due process |
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2013
- Messages
- 23,138
- Reaction score
- 48,402
He's a leftwinger@panamaican
1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis
Verdict: Calm, logical, and empathetic. While clearly opinionated, the poster’s focus is on thoughtful analysis, ethical coherence, and respectful discussion. Pushes back when necessary, but typically with an educational rather than antagonistic tone.
Category Assessment Politeness Moderate to High. This user generally remains composed, respectful, and avoids personal insults even in the midst of disagreement. Sarcasm and occasional frustration surface, but not to the point of hostility. Kindness Moderate. Shows empathy toward vulnerable individuals (e.g., pregnant women, minors, immigrants, low-income families), and frequently argues for fairness and systemic support. Kindness is expressed through reasoned argument rather than emotional appeals. Anger Low to Moderate. User displays frustration at hypocrisy, poor argumentation, or moral inconsistency but doesn't explode into rants. Tone remains mostly level and measured. Tone Rational, deliberate, assertive. Willing to correct misinformation and walk others through their reasoning. Can be a bit exasperated at times, but rarely mean-spirited. Empathy High. Frequent concern for social systems, due process, and real-world burdens placed on people. Demonstrates moral consistency and attempts to anchor arguments in lived experiences.
2. Intelligence Estimation
Estimated Intelligence: Very High
- Language Use:
Well-articulated and precise. Uses clear sentence structures and avoids jargon. Makes frequent use of analogies and logic. Rare spelling/grammar issues, often points them out in others. Communicates both legal and political concepts effectively.- Argumentation:
Strong. Builds arguments systematically, responds directly to others' points, and frequently includes counter-examples or reframing to make logical distinctions. Cites legal standards (due process, felony statutes), economic trends, and historical context.- Analytical Depth:
Very high. Balances legal insight with real-world considerations. Deconstructs ideological claims and public policies with nuance. Often highlights contradictions in opposing arguments and proposes thoughtful alternatives.
Methodical, articulate, and capable of complex reasoning. Uses legal reasoning, economic analysis, and ethical frameworks fluently. Responds with substance over style and shows deep familiarity with political, legal, and social systems.
Left–Right Spectrum
Assessment: Center-Left / Pragmatic Progressive — Strong belief in personal liberty, legal fairness, and the value of well-designed public systems. Deeply suspicious of both moral absolutism and government overreach. Balances progressive ethics with procedural caution.
Evidence Leaning Supports abortion rights, public health, social services Progressive Left Opposes authoritarianism, ideological coercion, and moral hypocrisy Liberal Advocates civil liberties, economic realism, and evidence-based governance Center-left to Technocratic Progressive Expresses nuance about religion, welfare systems, and foreign policy Thoughtful Center-Left
Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum
Assessment: Liberal Libertarian / Civil Liberties Advocate — Strong support for personal freedoms, especially in healthcare, privacy, and bodily autonomy. Believes in government as a necessary structure, but not as a moral enforcer.
Evidence Leaning Emphasizes individual autonomy in reproductive rights, immigration, and education Libertarian Opposes surveillance and unnecessary criminalization Libertarian Supports legal due process, institutional accountability, and privacy Libertarian Argues for civil rights grounded in law, not cultural conformity Anti-authoritarian liberalism
“The Rational Liberal”
Empathetic and policy-literate, this user prefers reasoned debate to polemics. They are deeply informed about the law, governance, and economics, and aim for fairness in discussions—even with those they oppose. Grounded in secular ethics, they distrust simplistic solutions and demand intellectual integrity.
Trait Assessment Politeness Moderate to High (measured and respectful) Rudeness/Kindness Generally kind, rarely abrasive Anger Level Low to Moderate — aimed at poor reasoning, not people Intellectual Depth Very High — legal clarity, historical grounding, practical insight Political Leaning Center-Left / Progressive Authority Preference Libertarian — strong belief in personal agency and due process
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2007
- Messages
- 126,899
- Reaction score
- 62,407
I texted an ex Sherbro about this, @Neph. I only sent him the Archetype but he thought you personally had written it about me and been studying my posts and said he loved you haha. He didn't click that it was AI, but spot on, for all my foibles.@fingercuffs
1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis
Category Assessment Politeness Low to Medium – The poster frequently uses sarcasm, bluntness, profanity, and mockery to express frustration or criticism. Occasionally offers friendly banter or sincere engagement. Kindness Moderate – Despite a hostile tone, the poster consistently shows concern for vulnerable groups (e.g., children, minorities, women, LGBT+ individuals), and occasionally softens in one-on-one exchanges. Anger High – There is intense frustration aimed at political figures, perceived injustices, and hypocrisy. Their tone suggests personal offense taken at systemic failures. Tone Combative, sardonic, emotionally charged. At times playful, at times venomous. Empathy Medium to High – While combative, the poster shows genuine empathy when discussing children at protests, gay friends, or social injustice. Also reflects personal emotional experience (e.g., family, trauma).
2. Intelligence Estimation
- Language Use: Witty, expressive, and full of slang, satire, and hyperbole. Writes fluently and with strong stylistic variation.
- Argumentation: Passionate but not always structured. Frequently uses rhetorical questions, sarcasm, and irony. Their moral intuitions are clear, but logic may take a backseat to emotional delivery.
- Knowledge Indicators: High familiarity with US and UK politics, pop culture, religious themes, civil rights, and internet subculture. References specific events (Epstein logs, USAID, Proud Boys), indicating broad awareness.
Left–Right Spectrum
Evidence Leaning Strong anti-Trump, anti-MAGA, anti-fascist sentiments Left Pro-LGBTQ+, anti-racist, pro-feminist sentiments Left Critical of both left and right figures when hypocritical Left-Critical Emphasis on institutional corruption, corporate exploitation, and religious abuse Left-Libertarian Concerned about cultural and economic inequality Progressive
Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum
Evidence Leaning Fiercely defends free expression, LGBTQ+ rights, and freedom from religious dogma Libertarian Rejects state overreach (e.g., ICE, police brutality, Proud Boys support) Libertarian Occasionally suggests regulation when it protects vulnerable people Left-libertarian Favors mutual respect over deference to traditional hierarchy Anti-authoritarian
Trait Assessment Politeness Low – direct, vulgar, combative Kindness Medium – often concealed behind sarcasm Anger Level High – deeply frustrated, especially with injustice Intellectual Depth High verbal and cultural intelligence Political Leaning Strongly Progressive Left Authority Preference Libertarian / Anti-Authoritarian
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2007
- Messages
- 37,171
- Reaction score
- 61,334
Wouldn’t you at least say that those positions are historically liberal or left spectrum positions?
I don’t think many republicans are out there saying to tax the rich, break up corporations and boost the EPA.
- Status
