I do. I wanted to scrape it, but it had issues, so I copy/paste a page of comments at a time (5 pages total for 100 comments) and use a program to quickly clean it (ie removes all content except for the message itself - no names, threads, times/dates etc.). Then I run it through ChatGPT.
Here you are, according to ChatGPT:
Profile of the Poster
1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis
| Category | Assessment |
|---|
| Politeness | Moderate. Occasionally sarcastic or pointed, but avoids outright insults. Frustration is evident, but the poster generally maintains civility even in contentious threads. |
| Kindness | Moderate to High. Shows empathy toward immigrants, minorities, the working class, and politically marginalized groups. Frequently calls out racism, xenophobia, and economic unfairness. |
| Anger | Moderate. Strong frustration toward misinformation, misrepresentation, and far-right populism—especially MAGA supporters—but this is usually expressed through detailed rebuttals, not rage. |
| Tone | Assertive, informed, and exasperated. Passionate about civic discourse and fair debate. Uses dry wit and rhetorical questions, but rarely lashes out. |
| Empathy | High. Shows sustained concern for immigrants, working-class Americans, civil rights, and the consequences of political extremism. Often reframes debates around real-world outcomes for vulnerable groups. |
Verdict: A socially conscious and rhetorically skilled poster. Although frequently annoyed by bad-faith arguments or perceived dishonesty, they engage from a place of concern for justice, equity, and good governance. Tone can be condescending toward extreme right-wing views, but rarely cruel.
2. Intelligence Estimation
- Language Use:
Highly articulate. Writes in full, structured sentences. Utilizes analogies, clarifications, and summary logic. Capable of sustaining long-form debate with continuity and clarity.
- Argumentation:
Strong. Tracks and challenges misrepresentations, cites data (e.g. housing markets, tariffs, immigration policy), and incorporates economic and political theory into rebuttals. Frequently re-centers discussions around context and definitions.
- Analytical Depth:
High. Discusses population trends, legal theory, immigration systems, and political theory with nuance. Comfortable parsing through motives, consequences, and unintended effects of policy decisions. Willing to admit complexity or uncertainty when appropriate.
Estimated Intelligence: High to Very High
Well-informed and confident in complex discourse. The user shows strong critical thinking skills, handles ideological disagreement with structured reasoning, and holds a high standard for truth and logical consistency.
Ideological Orientation
Left–Right Spectrum
| Evidence | Leaning |
|---|
| Defends immigration, multiculturalism, and refugee policy | Progressive Left |
| Opposes MAGA, nationalism, and Great Replacement rhetoric | Progressive |
| Favors economic inclusion and criticizes supply-side populism | Center-left |
| Supports Bernie Sanders in primaries but accepts political pragmatism | Progressive Left with moderate pragmatist tendencies |
Assessment: Progressive Left — Strongly critical of right-wing populism and ethno-nationalism. Supports social liberalism, immigration, equitable economics, and empirically guided governance. Open to moderate candidates when aligned with democratic values.
Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum
| Evidence | Leaning |
|---|
| Defends civil liberties and opposes authoritarian tendencies | Libertarian |
| Critiques government overreach and abuse of power (e.g., presidential retaliation) | Libertarian |
| Values rule of law and due process | Libertarian-leaning civic liberal |
| Opposes ideological policing and emphasizes individual freedoms | Civil libertarian ethos |
Assessment: Libertarian Left — Strong supporter of civil rights, open societies, and institutional safeguards. Opposes authoritarianism on both ends of the political spectrum and consistently defends individual autonomy within a democratic framework.
Archetype Match
“The Principled Pragmatist”
Analytical, data-driven, and emotionally grounded in fairness. This user engages with ideological opponents not for sport but to challenge dangerous narratives and promote better policy. Combines moral clarity with political realism and prioritizes real-world outcomes over tribal loyalty.
Summary Table
| Trait | Assessment |
|---|
| Politeness | Moderate (firm but not abusive) |
| Rudeness/Kindness | Often kind, with occasional sharpness in rebuttals |
| Anger Level | Moderate — aimed at misinformation and extremism |
| Intellectual Depth | High to Very High — excels in debate, policy, and framing |
| Political Leaning | Progressive Left |
| Authority Preference | Libertarian — skeptical of concentrated power, values due process |
