Social War Room Lounge Thread #325: PotWR Edition

[Neph]

@Mr Holmes

Haha it called you a right wing shitposter

Profile of the Poster​

---

1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis​

Category	Assessment
Politeness	Low. Often sarcastic, mocking, and combative. Responds to disagreement with hostility, ridicule, and name-calling.
Kindness	Minimal. Displays contempt for political opponents. Occasional acknowledgment of another user’s point, but generally dismissive and adversarial.
Anger	High. Frequently angry and frustrated, especially toward the political left, illegal immigration, and perceived media manipulation. Tone is caustic and often inflammatory.
Tone	Aggressive, sarcastic, cynical. Littered with ridicule and insults, often hidden behind internet humor and memes.
Empathy	Extremely selective. Shows some concern for American workers and perceived victims of left-wing policies. Shows disdain for marginalized groups like immigrants, trans people, and protesters.

Verdict: The poster is combative and entrenched, using mockery and sarcasm as rhetorical tools. Hostile to perceived left-wing ideologies and often quick to insult others rather than debate in good faith.

---

2. Intelligence Estimation​

• Language Use: Casual and frequently vulgar. Intersperses mock memes, internet slang, and references to forum users. Occasionally coherent in presenting logical (if ideologically tilted) arguments.
• Argumentation: Argumentation is often buried in sarcasm, with assertions left unsupported or based on cherry-picked examples. Shows a mix of surface-level political awareness and conspiracy-tinged speculation.
• Analytical Depth: Inconsistent. Occasionally engages with facts (e.g., FBI reports on China, labor market impacts), but generally sticks to ideological talking points. Unwilling to seriously challenge their own beliefs.

Estimated Intelligence: Moderate
Not unintelligent, but reflexively ideological and unwilling to reason outside their worldview. Relies heavily on meme-speak and mockery rather than substantive engagement.

---

Ideological Orientation​

Left–Right Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Extremely critical of Democrats, progressives, immigration policy	Right
Frequent use of culture war buzzwords: “woke,” “shitlibs,” “muh fascism,” etc.	Right-wing populist
Hostile to DEI, gender identity discourse, trans issues, and perceived race-based policies	Culturally far-right
Occasionally cites working-class struggles, but only as a rhetorical tool against immigration	Economically nationalist/right

Assessment: Hard Right
Firmly entrenched in anti-left rhetoric. Embraces right-populist narratives that blend nationalism, anti-immigration sentiment, and disdain for liberal elites.

---

Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Frequently calls for harsh policy enforcement (e.g., immigration, criminal justice)	Authoritarian-leaning
Mocking of civil rights movements, protesters, and left-leaning legal protections	Strongly authoritarian cultural tone
Distrust of global NGOs, media, and “the regime”	Libertarian tendencies regarding elite distrust, but still favors coercive state power on issues

Assessment: Authoritarian-leaning
Favors strong state control in service of nationalist and socially conservative goals. Anti-establishment on a rhetorical level, but favors punitive authority where it aligns with their ideology.

---

Archetype Match​

“The Right-Wing Shitposter”
A poster fueled by culture war resentment and a conviction that Western civilization is under attack. Their posts are peppered with sarcasm, hostility, and crude humor. While there may be glimmers of substantive thought, they are drowned out by meme-logic and partisanship. Engages for the thrill of verbal combat, not to persuade.

---

Summary Table​

Trait	Assessment
Politeness	Low — abrasive and mocking
Kindness	Low — highly partisan and hostile
Anger Level	High — outrage-driven commentary
Intellectual Depth	Moderate — selective engagement
Political Leaning	Hard right, nationalist-populist
Authority Preference	Authoritarian-leaning

 

[Neph]

(deleted)

 

[Limbo Pete]

@Mr Holmes

Haha it called you a right wing shitposter

Profile of the Poster​

---

1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis​

Category	Assessment
Politeness	Low. Often sarcastic, mocking, and combative. Responds to disagreement with hostility, ridicule, and name-calling.
Kindness	Minimal. Displays contempt for political opponents. Occasional acknowledgment of another user’s point, but generally dismissive and adversarial.
Anger	High. Frequently angry and frustrated, especially toward the political left, illegal immigration, and perceived media manipulation. Tone is caustic and often inflammatory.
Tone	Aggressive, sarcastic, cynical. Littered with ridicule and insults, often hidden behind internet humor and memes.
Empathy	Extremely selective. Shows some concern for American workers and perceived victims of left-wing policies. Shows disdain for marginalized groups like immigrants, trans people, and protesters.

---

2. Intelligence Estimation​

• Language Use: Casual and frequently vulgar. Intersperses mock memes, internet slang, and references to forum users. Occasionally coherent in presenting logical (if ideologically tilted) arguments.
• Argumentation: Argumentation is often buried in sarcasm, with assertions left unsupported or based on cherry-picked examples. Shows a mix of surface-level political awareness and conspiracy-tinged speculation.
• Analytical Depth: Inconsistent. Occasionally engages with facts (e.g., FBI reports on China, labor market impacts), but generally sticks to ideological talking points. Unwilling to seriously challenge their own beliefs.

---

Ideological Orientation​

Left–Right Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Extremely critical of Democrats, progressives, immigration policy	Right
Frequent use of culture war buzzwords: “woke,” “shitlibs,” “muh fascism,” etc.	Right-wing populist
Hostile to DEI, gender identity discourse, trans issues, and perceived race-based policies	Culturally far-right
Occasionally cites working-class struggles, but only as a rhetorical tool against immigration	Economically nationalist/right

---

Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Frequently calls for harsh policy enforcement (e.g., immigration, criminal justice)	Authoritarian-leaning
Mocking of civil rights movements, protesters, and left-leaning legal protections	Strongly authoritarian cultural tone
Distrust of global NGOs, media, and “the regime”	Libertarian tendencies regarding elite distrust, but still favors coercive state power on issues

---

Archetype Match​

---

Summary Table​

Trait	Assessment
Politeness	Low — abrasive and mocking
Kindness	Low — highly partisan and hostile
Anger Level	High — outrage-driven commentary
Intellectual Depth	Moderate — selective engagement
Political Leaning	Hard right, nationalist-populist
Authority Preference	Authoritarian-leaning

Pwnt lololololololol

 

[Neph]

Hey @Neph can you run me over with you AI mobile please?

Profile of the Poster​

---

1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis​

Category	Assessment
Politeness	Low – Regular use of insults, expletives (“fuck me,” “you suck”), sarcasm, and rhetorical mockery. Rarely engages respectfully even with neutral or curious posters.
Kindness	Moderate-low – Demonstrates human empathy in specific causes (e.g. condemning civilian deaths, ICE abuses), but this compassion is selectively applied and drowned by contempt for others.
Anger	High – Tone is regularly aggrieved, incredulous, or hostile, especially toward conservatives, right-wing populists, Trump, and Israel. Uses inflammatory phrasing often.
Tone	Sarcastic, confrontational, ideologically aggressive, occasionally snarky or ironic. Mocking tone is pervasive.
Empathy	Selective. Strong sympathy for Palestinians, victims of state violence, or economic injustice. Little to no empathy for ideological opponents, whom the poster frequently dehumanizes or ridicules.

Verdict: Poster operates in a constant rhetorical combat mode. Driven by outrage at perceived hypocrisy and injustice, but also quick to generalize and insult. Uses mockery as a primary tool of persuasion or defense.

---

2. Intelligence Estimation​

• Language Use: Fluent, often witty or sardonic. Uses analogies, rhetorical questions, and extended criticism to make points. Capable of complex sentence structure and layered sarcasm.
• Argumentation: Despite the harsh tone, often includes evidence (e.g., links to news sources), cause-effect reasoning, and context in arguments. Understands geopolitics and market dynamics, even if expressed informally.
• Analytical Depth: High in areas of focus (e.g., Israel-Palestine, Western politics, economic inequality). Shows capacity for multi-layered critiques and mocking contradictions.

Estimated Intelligence: Above Average to High
Shows strong critical reasoning and argumentative sharpness. Could be more persuasive with more measured tone. Sarcasm limits accessibility, but underlying reasoning is solid.

---

Ideological Orientation​

Left–Right Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Strongly anti-Trump, anti-Israel, anti-nationalist, anti-populist	Left
Frequently references inequality, injustice, militarism	Progressive left
Mocking of conservatives, Farage, Musk, and “thickie” right-wing voters	Culturally left
Defends public services, criticizes capitalist excess	Economically left

Assessment: Strongly Left-Wing
Values international cooperation, anti-war positions, minority protections, and systemic critique. Hostile to nationalism and neoliberal capitalism. Displays disillusionment with both major parties (especially in the U.S.) from a left-wing perspective.

---

Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Consistently skeptical of authority, both domestic and foreign	Libertarian
Condemns state overreach, militarism, and “media manipulation”	Civil libertarian
Occasionally supports legal accountability, but not through strong state action	Soft-libertarian

Assessment: Libertarian-leaning
Displays consistent distrust in concentrated power—especially military, corporate, or state. Prefers transparency, accountability, and grassroots action over institutional trust.

---

Archetype Match​

“The Cynical Leftist Firebrand”
They speak in scathing critiques of power, with sarcasm as a second language. Politically sharp and emotionally charged, they’re as fed up with neoliberal centrism as they are with conservative populism. World-weary, they believe most institutions are rotten—but still hold tight to ideals like justice and human rights, at least for the underdog.

---

Summary Table​

Trait	Assessment
Politeness	Low – confrontational and profane
Kindness	Selective – empathetic but partisan
Anger Level	High – disillusioned, mocking, combative
Intellectual Depth	High – analytical, cynical, informed
Political Leaning	Strongly Left
Authority Preference	Libertarian-leaning

 

[LangfordBarrow]

@Mr Holmes

Haha it called you a right wing shitposter

Profile of the Poster​

---

1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis​

Category	Assessment
Politeness	Low. Often sarcastic, mocking, and combative. Responds to disagreement with hostility, ridicule, and name-calling.
Kindness	Minimal. Displays contempt for political opponents. Occasional acknowledgment of another user’s point, but generally dismissive and adversarial.
Anger	High. Frequently angry and frustrated, especially toward the political left, illegal immigration, and perceived media manipulation. Tone is caustic and often inflammatory.
Tone	Aggressive, sarcastic, cynical. Littered with ridicule and insults, often hidden behind internet humor and memes.
Empathy	Extremely selective. Shows some concern for American workers and perceived victims of left-wing policies. Shows disdain for marginalized groups like immigrants, trans people, and protesters.

---

2. Intelligence Estimation​

• Language Use: Casual and frequently vulgar. Intersperses mock memes, internet slang, and references to forum users. Occasionally coherent in presenting logical (if ideologically tilted) arguments.
• Argumentation: Argumentation is often buried in sarcasm, with assertions left unsupported or based on cherry-picked examples. Shows a mix of surface-level political awareness and conspiracy-tinged speculation.
• Analytical Depth: Inconsistent. Occasionally engages with facts (e.g., FBI reports on China, labor market impacts), but generally sticks to ideological talking points. Unwilling to seriously challenge their own beliefs.

---

Ideological Orientation​

Left–Right Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Extremely critical of Democrats, progressives, immigration policy	Right
Frequent use of culture war buzzwords: “woke,” “shitlibs,” “muh fascism,” etc.	Right-wing populist
Hostile to DEI, gender identity discourse, trans issues, and perceived race-based policies	Culturally far-right
Occasionally cites working-class struggles, but only as a rhetorical tool against immigration	Economically nationalist/right

---

Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Frequently calls for harsh policy enforcement (e.g., immigration, criminal justice)	Authoritarian-leaning
Mocking of civil rights movements, protesters, and left-leaning legal protections	Strongly authoritarian cultural tone
Distrust of global NGOs, media, and “the regime”	Libertarian tendencies regarding elite distrust, but still favors coercive state power on issues

---

Archetype Match​

---

Summary Table​

Trait	Assessment
Politeness	Low — abrasive and mocking
Kindness	Low — highly partisan and hostile
Anger Level	High — outrage-driven commentary
Intellectual Depth	Moderate — selective engagement
Political Leaning	Hard right, nationalist-populist
Authority Preference	Authoritarian-leaning

Can you do me too please?

 

[Neph]

deleted

 

[Neph]

@Neph do me

Profile of the Poster​

---

1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis​

Category	Assessment
Politeness	Low – Sarcastic, mocking, and combative. Willing to escalate arguments with personal attacks (“you dunce cap,” “holy fuck you're stupid,” “fake wife guy”).
Kindness	Low to Moderate – Not overtly cruel in most posts, but frequently dismissive, sarcastic, and aggressive. Occasionally shows curiosity or camaraderie (e.g., “Legend,” “we’ll keep in touch”), but often undercut by condescension.
Anger	High – Quick to insult and aggressively call out perceived stupidity, hypocrisy, or bad faith. Derision and exasperation are common emotional tones.
Tone	Acerbic, adversarial, sardonic, occasionally humorous. Rarely earnest or conciliatory. Uses a conversational style but loaded with jabs.
Empathy	Low to Medium – Displays empathy selectively, especially when condemning government overreach or perceived injustice. However, rarely expresses compassion directly and shows disdain for political opponents.

Verdict: This poster thrives on confrontation and intellectual dominance, often mocking opponents with layered sarcasm. There's a glimmer of thoughtful engagement, but it’s buried beneath posturing, contempt, and ridicule.

---

2. Intelligence Estimation​

• Language Use: Fluent, sharp, and varied. Moves easily between rhetorical jabs, dense argumentation, and casual slang. Occasionally clever in framing rebuttals.
• Argumentation: Uses both deductive reasoning and real-world analogies (e.g., biker bars, geography, genetics). Shows ability to deconstruct others’ arguments while maintaining their own narrative thread.
• Analytical Depth: High. The poster is not only engaging in political discourse but is frequently pointing out contradictions, systemic trends, and power asymmetries with accuracy.

Estimated Intelligence: High
Likely well-read or at least highly engaged with news and political discourse. Would be significantly more persuasive if not consistently undermined by hostility and mockery.

---

Ideological Orientation​

Left–Right Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Mocking liberals for abandoning principles, criticizing left hypocrisy	Right-Skeptical
Supports conservative arguments on genetics, culture, geography	Right-Conservative
Calls out the global justice system for left-wing bias	Populist Right
Expresses cynicism toward Trump but defends structural conservative views	Anti-Establishment Right

Assessment: Right-Leaning Populist with Anti-Left Sentiment
Poster appears disillusioned with mainstream left politics, frequently calling out hypocrisy, selective enforcement, and ideological rigidity. Still expresses some distance from traditional conservatives (e.g., criticizes Trump). Strong alignment with cultural conservatism and civilizational framing of politics.

---

Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Emphasizes merit, behavior, civilizational strength	Authoritarian-ish
Advocates for brutal punishment in some cases	Authoritarian
Disdain for perceived censorship and government overreach	Libertarian-leaning
Doesn’t call for more state but often wants swift, harsh justice	Mixed

Assessment: Populist-Authoritarian with Libertarian Mistrust of Institutions
Wants accountability and order but distrusts current institutional legitimacy. Strongman rhetoric (“beat the shit out of his parents”) indicates preference for retributive action over procedural justice.

---

Archetype Match​

“The Nationalist Contrarian Gladiator”
Fueled by disdain for elite hypocrisy and intellectual dishonesty, this poster challenges both liberal orthodoxy and weak conservatism. They blend aggressive cultural pride with civilizational fatalism. Crude, sharp, and combative—they’re here to win, not to persuade.

---

Summary Table​

Trait	Assessment
Politeness	Low – confrontational and insulting
Kindness	Low – mocking with rare friendliness
Anger Level	High – deeply combative and aggrieved
Intellectual Depth	High – articulate, complex reasoning
Political Leaning	Populist Right
Authority Preference	Mixed – authoritarian in punishment, libertarian in structure

 

[Neph]

(deleted)

 

[DoctorTaco]

Poster Profile​

---

1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis​

Category	Assessment
Politeness	Low – Frequently rude, sarcastic, and confrontational. Language like “you dunce cap,” “holy fuck you're stupid,” and “pull your head out of your ass” is common.
Kindness	Low – Minimal empathy shown. Comments are often mocking or scornful, with occasional gestures toward humor or camaraderie, but usually in a crude or sarcastic tone.
Anger	High – Highly reactive, often emotionally charged. Regularly vents frustration toward political opponents, left-leaning institutions, and perceived hypocrisy.
Tone	Aggressive, confrontational, occasionally performative or theatrical. Uses insult-based humor, mock-intellectual phrasing, and adversarial questioning.
Empathy	Very selective – Sometimes shows concern for fairness in legal/political processes (e.g., opposition suppression), but generally dismissive of opponents' suffering or views.

---

2. Intelligence Estimation​

• Language Use: Complex sentence structures, sarcasm, rhetorical questions, and mocking commentary. Not polished, but very fluent and quick-witted.
• Argumentation: Shows capacity for abstract reasoning (e.g., geographical advantage, multifactorial causes of culture), but is often more interested in scoring points than persuading. Uses analogies and historical references.
• Analytical Depth: Moderate to High. The poster is clearly capable of deeper engagement, particularly on geopolitics, sociology, and culture. However, emotional tone and desire to provoke often interfere with clarity or rigor.

---

Ideological Orientation​

Left–Right Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Mocks the left as hypocritical, corrupt, and censorious	Anti-Left
Supports cultural arguments about genetics and civilization	Ethno-Cultural Right
Sympathetic to populist right parties (AfD, Milei), critical of Trudeau	Nationalist Right
Rejects far-right label but espouses similar rhetoric	Reactionary Right

---

Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Calls for harsh retributive justice (e.g., beating someone and their dog)	Authoritarian
Strong belief in state overreach, skepticism of institutions	Libertarian-leaning
Emphasizes individual merit, behavior, and personal responsibility	Libertarian
Supports social cohesion and hierarchy	Authoritarian-leaning

---

Archetype Match​

---

Summary Table​

Trait	Assessment
Politeness	Low – aggressive, mocking tone
Kindness	Low – snide and mocking, rarely gentle
Anger Level	High – often boiling over with sarcasm
Intellectual Depth	Above Average – combative but thoughtful
Political Leaning	Strong Right-Wing Populist
Authority Preference	Right-Authoritarian (with distrust of current systems)

think that might be someone else, but I’ll take it bc I do love teasing my fellow lefties

 

[Neph]

(deleted - wrong messages)

 

[DoctorTaco]

These are the comments that were sent to ChatGPT:

Comment
I didn't mean it like that. I meant it more like....have a go at me.
@Neph do me
Legend
Did @Jack V Savage die or something? I haven't seen him stinking up any threads since the elections at least.
we'll keep in touch.
A huge issue in retrieving a lot of these things is that, often times, people live on the soil it's buried in. That's the beauty of Greece, you could dig almost anywhere and hit some ancient artifacts. But land owners would never admit it because they fear the government would intrude somehow...
No way, bens accent is so much funnier.
Doesn't matter, I'm responding to your post.
Northern Ireland is.
I imagine it going down like one adult vs 50 little kids.
You probably shouldn't be engaging in discussions concerning geography. Your track record isn't the best there.
He's trying to pick a slap fight so he's throwing anything at the wall hoping it sticks.
Not sure if you heard but Greece is actually doing pretty good right about now. Still not out of trouble, but they are well on their way. You are living in the past ironically. And we can sit on a pedestal, we're goated. Your just pissed because you learned Cleopatra wasn't actually black.
I have no clue what's going on right now.
@Prefect Hey crow boy. You happy about this outcome?
How on earth did you extrapolate that nonsense from my question? * Grabs popcorn *
The Greeks are P4P the biggest contributors to the world. Let's count it down where they've made contributions: Architecture Mathematics Science Warfare Drama (we invented this shit) Democracy (this too) Philosophy ( this too biatch) Medicine Political theory Law We also were ranked as...
Would you dare to call them savages?
Oh you mean like the 5 civilized tribes that owned slaves?
Tell that to North Africa. Two fucking countries to the north and south and two bodies of water to the west and east. That's relative, not literal isolation you dunce cap. Greece (my motherland) is surrounded by Turkey, Bulgaria, Albania, Macedonia and just across the pond you have Libya and...
Concession accepted. Piss off.
Water, timber, metals. What's wild is you thinking America isn't advantaged. Like that's th most brain-dead take I've heard basically ever. Isolation geographically. Look at the map and tell me which countries are next to America. This isn't controversial. Like I said, America is more...
Yea I don't know I'm not expert. What is Britain made up of? Ango-saxons (Germanic tribes) Danes and Celts? I mean that's SOME diversity.
Asking a series of questions when being asked questions isn't "clarifying" When I ask you whether or not genetics is a portion of culture, the best thing to do if you want to convince people you agree, is to simply say " yes" instead of: Or If you agree with the sentiment, you do not...
LOL. Navigable rivers, relative isolation, vast natural resources, coastal access, diverse climates, rich and fertile land. The fuck are you even talking about?
Oh okay, so do you know that America is massively advantaged? If you do, will you concede that the natives were also "lucky"?
SIgh....once chat-gpt changed your mind you you started singing a different tune. If you genuinely agreed with the fact that it was an influencing variable, you wouldn't have written the dribble below when asked if you believed genetics was a portion of culture: Does the above suggest you...
Just to be clear, are you suggesting that America's geography is advantageous?
Homie, the second statement, which you now agree with, you said was incorrect and your using the first comment to validate your logic. Take a day off.
Brother, you can disagree with how much of an influence genetics has, but you essentially agree with his proposition. That word multifactorial is rather important if you want to maintain any intellectual honesty and because it debunks your position of his stance being complete biological...
I think it's obvious you have a comprehension issue. Can you quote "culture is a product of genetics." I don't recall @Hdfi saying that when he said "multifactorial" Yea and I see where you're coming from now too. I tip my fedora In your general direction.
Oh it was just luck then. That explains the natives in America with there over powered geographical advantages catapulting them into civilizational superstars...........wait a second.
Why didn't the other countries pillage them instead? How did white people get the leg up on them?
No you didn't. You asked questions in light of being asked questions. That's not answering anything. However, this: Is something that you, chat-gpt and me all agree with despite you saying it's incorrect. Do you know what multifactorial means?
It's a question to you, not me. Are you asking me my views or are you carrying the tradition of avoiding answering questions directly? If you're asking me I think it's a decent sized chunk. I think putting it in terms of percentages is stupid because there's no real way to measure it, but if...
Traits could be physical or behavioral. You made no distincion but I'm going to assume you understand behavioral traits can be inherited. I'm trying to understand how you can believe "traits" can be inherited but no portion of culture is an outward expression of said traits. Obviously, it takes...
There was nothing on a second go around. Any ways, how about that question?
I think she's using the term mongrel, no matter how stupid, to reinforce the idea of them being a diverse bunch. The enthusiasm to prove they aren't homogeneous, along with those thick black framed glasses are telling of her motivations, however.
Out of curiosity, do you think anything about our behavior is genetic?
We should also be honest about whether or not those countries sucked before colonization.
Not the stats I was talking about. White men and middle eastern women were number one. Besides, where are blacks on that list?
Because it's an easy perspective to have. Who the fuck walks into a biker bar, racks up a tab and doesn't pay up? Like you're asking for it at that point. Like if there was a video of a white guy walking into the hood yelling racial obscenities only for him to get a beat down I highly doubt...
This is the new strategy in the lefty playbook. Right wing party gaining favor? Label them Putin/Trump collaborators and claim the election is rigged. Left wing party wins election? Real democracy.
That's horrible. Hopefully it passes over him quickly and he doesn't suffer too much.
Cringe as fuck.
You should, it's actually hilarious.
Is this a progressive or conservative pope?
Andy cuck is from PEI?
As expected you're full of shit. Cause and effect, keep ignoring those issues and you'll get more Trump like figures bending you over while we all clap. Pull your head out of your ass.
And because you are perfectly consistent, I'm sure you take issue with Romania annulling election results and Germany attempting to ban AfD right? AfD being labelled an extremist organization is something you take issue with because it's a bunch of bull shit right?
This is how political parties gangsterize. Continue doing shit like this and masquerading as the "good guys" and it will come back to bite you in the ass.
Wow, I forgot how embarrassing this post was. Just wanted to remind you fake wife guy.
The projection is strong in this post. Lol @ cop out. 1) The liberals needed to adopt the conservative platform to succeed. 2) The idea that was Pierre focusing on Trudeau is obfuscation (and complete bullshit btw) from the point above. 3)The liberals focused on Trump. Literally what you...
That was against Trudeau and without Trump opening his fucking yap. Trudy stepping down and Trump being fucking retarded is what won the liberals the election. The two scenarios don't compare. You guys need to stop framing this as if he fumbled something. Literally nothing changed on his side...
Yea I'm not the happiest the liberals won, but their play was impressive.
They should probably take back their refugees if they haven't already.
And pipelines........if he doesn't flop on everything.
I don't think he does.
Because in order for that to happen the liberals had to abandon their principles and adopt conservative policies while wiping out the far left of the country. This isn't rocket science.
I'm confused, do you think we're trying to cope with this perspective?
Here's how I view it. The entire landscape shifted to the right. For the liberals to be electorally viable, they had to adopt conservative policies which conservatives don't mind. The guy who was elected, while not a conservatives first choice, isn't as big an issue as Trudeau was. It's...
Not sure exactly what he means, but I do agree. I'd personally prefer Canada become an all out monarchy. Let the Windsors take over. We could have had the Queen in charge her entire reign rather than these cans.
He's done more for the internationalist order, at a time when they were getting a shellacking at the polls, than anyone else. The left should be thrilled right now.
Probably the only thing I'll agree with you on. Trump has been a complete disaster for the global right. Every time he opens his fucking mouth the right (from any country ) hemorrhages any gains they've made over the years.
There's always a way. Just gotta remind them they are Turkified Greeks anyways.
Greece vs Turkey
LOL what? This has to be the worst take I've read in a while.
Holy fuck you're stupid.
When did I say I did?
Really? First I'm hearing about it. Do you have a source or anything I could read?
The punishment needs to be brutal, but swift. He was beaten up once you say? Not hard enough probably. Find out where the little shit lives and beat the shit out of his parents. Get someone to hold him down and watch as you punt his dog like a football. Lastly, piss on him to assert dominance.
What exactly are you trying to say here? Are you suggesting that El Salvador has not Infact been cleaned up?
Is there an objective with these tariffs or is this something he conjured up after ripping a fat rail in the a white house powder room?
The extent of that cucks abilities are to hit you up with the laughing emoji.
The numbers are different and, as @Madmick pointed out, lower. Milei has notably improved Argentina.
That's the best one yet. The lack of self awareness is astonishing.
Oh right, the law that magically kicks in and is positively correlated to politicians who are rising in the polls. Don't worry, continue to masquerade this bullshit attempt at justice and watch how it bites you guys in the ass later.
Yea I'm sure you're singing the same tune when Erdogan or Putin jails the opposition. Right? The opposition were corrupt anyways so fuckem, yea? Oh that's right, you're a partisan hack that's full of shit and from a narco state where this level of corruption is the norm of course you don't...
He'll be put on death row for some unpaid parking tickets I'm sure.
The candidate didn't pass the purity test based on some bogus charges. Save it for the electorate when you get on your pedestal lecturing them about democracy.
Man, you think it could be some sort of genetic predisposition to crime or perhaps some socio-economic factors at play?
Man it's just crazy to think when the law is fairly applied, it reveals the true criminality of the right. I guess they really are just a bunch of criminals, Putin/Trump collaborators and the leftists are the real good guys. To think I almost voted for one for those people! Phew! Dodged a...
That's essentially already happening. It's the "democratic" way.
I don't even use Twitter. I find it hilarious that the justice system in Europe is as selective as its democracy. The narrative we are seeing, and that you seals are lapping up is "right wing bad, left wing good." How fucking convenient, in a time where the left was being swallowed alive...
Romania annulling the first round of elections to Marine le Pen being barred from public office. EU democracy is super democratic.
It always makes me laugh thinking about this. I think it happened because the left attempted to realign themselves as the party of science. So now any sort of holistic/nutritional approach to health , that isn't a pill/vaccine, is seen as some weird right-wing "pull yourself up by the boot...
Annulling election results seems pretty undemocratic, dare I say "fascist" even. But sure, you can go back to thinking being apart of the left is like holding hands and singing Kumbaya around a camp fire. Also, I'm not sure why you're suggesting I'm hand waiving anything or making it seem like...

None of that came from me

 

[Neph]

delete

 

[Neph]

None of that came from me

I think I see what I've done, I've fed it the wrong one. My apologies; will delete and rerun

 

[DoctorTaco]

I think I see what I've done, I've fed it the wrong one. My apologies; will delete and rerun

Thanks papa bear

 

[Neph]

Thanks papa bear

Poster Profile​

---

1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis​

Category	Assessment
Politeness	Moderate to High – Generally civil, humorous, and often self-deprecating. Occasional sarcasm and pointed responses, but rarely cruel or mean-spirited.
Kindness	High – Shows empathy toward others, engages in thoughtful conversation, avoids blanket condemnation of opposing views, and uses personal anecdotes to connect.
Anger	Low to Moderate – Expresses frustration occasionally (especially around hypocrisy or injustice), but it’s often tempered with wit or reflective commentary.
Tone	Casual, thoughtful, playful. Often engages others in good faith. Balances snark with sincerity. Uses humor to defuse tension or critique.
Empathy	High – Clearly tries to understand others' positions and frequently asks clarifying questions or offers room for disagreement.

Verdict: This poster comes across as measured, curious, and socially intelligent. They use humor and personal insight to engage without escalating conflict, and seem genuinely interested in dialogue rather than domination.

---

2. Intelligence Estimation​

• Language Use: Witty, fluent, and articulate. Can be clever with wordplay (e.g., “Moronico” quip, commentary on “britches” vs. “drawers”) and communicates ideas clearly, even when tackling sensitive or layered topics.
• Argumentation: Strong use of analogy, evidence, and personal experience. Rarely dogmatic—frequently invites discussion or offers room for interpretation.
• Analytical Depth: High. Demonstrates nuanced thinking about politics, parenting, economics, and tech. Often reframes arguments to clarify definitions or assumptions.

Estimated Intelligence: High, especially in emotional intelligence and social reasoning. The poster thinks critically, adapts tone to situation, and avoids cognitive rigidity.

---

Ideological Orientation​

Left–Right Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Defends progressive causes like porn regulation through education rather than prohibition	Left-Leaning
Critiques MAGA and Trump but doesn’t endorse all leftist ideas	Center-Left
Expresses skepticism toward both corporate elites and state overreach	Mixed
Supports personal responsibility but also recognizes systemic problems	Balanced

Assessment: Center-Left Libertarian
The poster often aligns with progressive values but resists ideological extremes. They appear pragmatic rather than tribal, with a “live and let live” ethos—progressive on social issues, skeptical of authoritarian solutions.

---

Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Advocates parental responsibility over government regulation	Libertarian
Supports freedom of expression and bodily autonomy	Libertarian
Rejects purity tests, coercion, and top-down censorship	Libertarian
Shows trust in individual agency more than institutional control	Strong Libertarian

Assessment: Social Libertarian
Values personal autonomy, open discourse, and skepticism of enforced morality. Argues for responsibility without mandates and values genuine conversation over virtue signaling or legalistic purity.

---

Archetype Match​

“The Principled Smartass”
Quick with a joke but deep in thought, this poster disarms with wit while sticking to core values: fairness, autonomy, and dialogue. Less interested in “winning” than in elevating the conversation, even when it means disagreeing with both sides. Think Jon Stewart or early Bill Maher energy.

---

Summary Table​

Trait	Assessment
Politeness	Moderate–High – Witty, cheeky, but respectful
Kindness	High – empathetic and good-humored
Anger Level	Low – frustration surfaces, but is rare
Intellectual Depth	High – clever, nuanced, emotionally smart
Political Leaning	Center-Left
Authority Preference	Libertarian

 

[Neph]

@DoctorTaco does that look better? I gave ChatGPT the wrong posts, sorry

 

[DoctorTaco]

@DoctorTaco does that look better? I gave ChatGPT the wrong posts, sorry

Sounds more like me, (although it neglected to mention my big dick and ridiculously handsome visage.)

Thanks man!

 

[Limbo Pete]

Sounds more like me, (although it neglected to mention my big dick and ridiculously handsome visage.)

Thanks man!

"The Principled Smartass"

 

[Koya]

Talk about a hold my beer moment:

And I thought no one would notice !

 

[Neph]

@Wrath of Foamy

Poster Profile​

---

1. Sentiment & Tone Analysis​

Category	Assessment
Politeness	Medium – Often casual or sardonic; not overtly hostile but freely uses dark humor, expletives, and sarcasm.
Kindness	Moderate – Occasionally empathetic (especially toward the economically vulnerable), but often masked under cynicism.
Anger	Moderate to High – Frequently expresses bitterness, resentment, and frustration—towards institutions, society, and political structures.
Tone	Wry, world-weary, bleakly humorous. Alternates between glib cynicism and moments of heartfelt honesty.
Empathy	Low to Moderate – Demonstrates capacity for empathy (e.g., concern for housing crisis, vaccine side effects), but also expresses mistrust and emotional fatigue (“empathy weakened me”).

Verdict: This poster is emotionally intelligent but jaded—guarded and defensive, likely shaped by disappointment or systemic letdowns. They show flashes of warmth and humanity, but mostly through gallows humor or social critique.

---

2. Intelligence Estimation​

• Language Use: Casual, clever, sharp. Uses wit and self-deprecating phrasing effectively. Swings between working-class vernacular and eloquent phrasing.
• Argumentation: Observational more than analytical. Tends to make emotionally grounded points rather than structured arguments. Skips theory; relies on lived experience and intuitive logic.
• Analytical Depth: Mixed. Often provides interesting social insights but rarely engages in detailed debate. Distrusts experts and high-minded theorizing.

Estimated Intelligence: Moderate to High
Likely well-read and experienced, but skeptical of academic or institutional authority. More “pub philosopher” than formal logician.

---

Ideological Orientation​

Left–Right Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Critiques the UK government, rising rent, wealth inequality	Left-Leaning
Critiques BBC, migrants, liberal overreach, woke media	Right-Leaning
Empathizes with low-income individuals; distrusts elite narratives	Populist / Mixed
Anti-war, anti-nationalist, anti-jingoist sentiment	Left-Libertarian-ish
Occasionally echoes nationalist or isolationist sentiments (UK fortress, distrust of outsiders)	Right-Adjacent

Assessment: Disaffected Populist / Skeptical Centrist
The poster is both anti-elite and anti-woke. Their views are pragmatic, reactive, and grounded in distrust of power—whether it comes from leftist idealism, conservative nationalism, or technocratic bureaucracy.

---

Authoritarian–Libertarian Spectrum​

Evidence	Leaning
Rejects state coercion (e.g., forced vaccination, top-down mandates)	Libertarian
Supports individual agency (parents, renters, workers)	Libertarian
Mocks both theocratic and progressive overreach	Libertarian
Expresses emotional exhaustion with institutional power	Cynical Libertarian

Assessment: Libertarian-Tinged Anti-Establishment
Sees the state as untrustworthy, whether it's enforcing vaccines, ignoring housing issues, or pushing censorship. Seems to value personal autonomy and the freedom to opt out—even if that freedom comes with some bitterness.

---

Archetype Match​

“The Disillusioned Everyman”
Worn down by rising costs, social fragmentation, and political tribalism, this poster jokes through their dissatisfaction. They don’t trust institutions or movements. They value fairness but don’t expect it. If you met them at a bar, they'd say, “I don’t do politics,” then spend two hours critiquing everything wrong with society, brilliantly and bitterly.

---

Summary Table​

Trait	Assessment
Politeness	Medium – snarky but not hostile
Kindness	Moderate – sometimes buried in sarcasm
Anger Level	Moderate to High – especially toward elites
Intellectual Depth	Moderate – insightful, observational thinker
Political Leaning	Disaffected Populist / Skeptical Centrist
Authority Preference	Libertarian / Cynical Anti-Authoritarian