"Doxxing may constitute criminal harassment under paragraphs 264(2)(b) or (d) depending upon the specific circumstances."
"In a 2016 decision of the Ontario Court of Justice, the trial judge provided a useful analysis of how a perpetrator may communicate directly or indirectly online with a targeted person:
Every time that Mr. Elliott started a tweet with [V’s] handle or mentioned Ms. [V], he communicated with her directly. When he tweeted mentioning her handle, he knew that it might be brought to her attention. Even after she blocked him, his perception that she was part of a group proves he knew tweets with her handle would reach her. I therefore find the repeated communication that the section requires.ⁱᵛ"