• We are currently experiencing technical difficulties. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience.

Social War Room Lounge 244: What a beautiful sight

Best Chips


  • Total voters
    57
Status
Not open for further replies.
It's really the sequence.

"Leftists argue that minorities can't get photo IDs."
"No, it's just that they are currently less likely to have them."
"Oh, so you're saying that minorities can't get photo IDs? Are they stupid?"
"No, I'm saying that they don't currently have them so the photo ID is just a push to reduce minority turnout."
"Because they can't possibly get photo IDs? That's what you're saying, right? Voter IDs laws are raaccist?"

Literal morons.


please excuse the delay...

back to back clients.

let's have this conversation. Why is it difficult for minorities or "persons of color" to acquire/possess valid Photo ID?

too many side jobs, lack of transportation ?
 
My girl runs a food page with like 60k followers over here in this bullshit city. We literally get paid to eat food all the time. Non stop offers and deals.
Gotta love those marketing dinners. And good for her.
 
Fucking lol


8bf1cb510a6bd81573189dcfc5233917d861842e_00.gif
 
On Thursday, California’s Supreme Court struck a major blow to the cash bail system in a ruling that should honestly be adopted across the nation. In a unanimous decision, the court ruled that it is unconstitutional to hold people in jail just because they can’t afford bail and that judges must assess a defendant’s financial status when setting bail.

“The common practice of conditioning freedom solely on whether an arrestee can afford bail is unconstitutional,” the justices stated in their ruling
 
please excuse the delay...

back to back clients.

let's have this conversation. Why is it difficult for minorities or "persons of color" to acquire/possess valid Photo ID?

too many side jobs, lack of transportation ?

The details of that are irrelevant. The observation is just that for whatever set of historical reasons, minorities are less likely to have photo IDs and also less likely to vote Republican. Sleazy politicians put those facts together and decide to require them. That's a dirty way to try to win elections. It's better to try to convince people that your ideas are better.
 
The details of that are irrelevant. The observation is just that for whatever set of historical reasons, minorities are less likely to have photo IDs and also less likely to vote Republican. Sleazy politicians put those facts together and decide to require them. That's a dirty way to try to win elections.

Ok
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top