War Room Awards 2016

Status
Not open for further replies.
He's already moved on to just making stuff up. :eek:

See, this is very dishonest. Even if you think you're right in our dispute--which is unfathomable to me--you know exactly what I'm talking about and what my position is. It's not "making stuff up."

I actually got rustled with him a while back and addressed him as "dickhead" for a bit over a month LOL. Why stay mad though? Some of you guys seem to have this raging hate-on going towards him and it doesn't make you look good. I'm sure Jack considers me a "lesser poster" but I just don't care and I have fun with it, try it sometime.

You know, I'm pretty sure I was confusing you with someone else when I (first) dropped that line. You can be annoying, but you're upper tier, IMO. Take a bow.

Ed: And to be honest, that was a fun exchange for both of us.
 
Last edited:
14234081.jpg
 
Why yes the gorilla unit knows how to fake being tough
 
Falsedowns and his typical false bravado. But deep down inside he knows he's the type that pays to post on a free forum and threatens to leave when he doesn't get his way.
 
The best part of these threads has always been the meltdowns. And I can see this year didn't disappoint, with Sherdogs very own little weasel revealing his bare red-ass for the world to see.

How many people in this thread think it's possible to rape your wife?

Man it's actually not even the worst shit he has posted.

Did you see this?
http://forums.sherdog.com/posts/118841251/

http://forums.sherdog.com/posts/112573667/

All of his posts in those threads are chilling..

But yeah, @dontsnitch has endorsed him several times, including in this thread. I have also seen him agree with @Thurisaz on several occasions: http://forums.sherdog.com/posts/115831143/.
I don't see how you can endorse and agree with that guy, and still pretend to be centrist and rational in your world view.
 
See, this is very dishonest. Even if you think you're right in our dispute--which is unfathomable to me--you know exactly what I'm talking about and what my position is. It's not "making stuff up."

Funny you call me dishonest for saying you don't believe your own claim when you continue to do the same by telling me I don't really believe my own position. But hey bro, I'm sure everyone believes the guy who pussied out when given the all-clear to post whatever he needed to from our PM's in order to substantiate his accusation. Just more hypocrisy from you. Or maybe it's the autism that people have picked up on. :eek:
 
Just because you deleted the evidence doesn't mean it's not true.

Lmao, literally what? Is this like pizzagate where we start throwing shit against the wall and see what dots we can connect?

Why do you lie so much? Simple question.
 
You know, I'm pretty sure I was confusing you with someone else when I (first) dropped that line. You can be annoying, but you're upper tier, IMO. Take a bow.

Ed: And to be honest, that was a fun exchange for both of us.
Interesting, I've wondered whether you got me mixed up with someone else when our somewhat infrequent interaction went from generally cordial to acrimonious in the blink of an eye. Of course I went from puzzled to rustled just as quickly. I'll accept "occasionally annoying" as some of my posts don't seem nearly as clever to me when I read them the next day. Since I would have been satisfied with "more or less average" I'll celebrate "upper tier" enthusiastically.
200.gif


As to the last, looking back it was all good for a few laughs.
 
He's referring to a series of threads where @Thurisaz argued that it is a logical impossibility to rape one's wife. The conversations were...interesting.
Less so for me. The idiocy of marital rape is predictably advocated by the same people who think a homo relationship can be called in any shape or form "marriage". Neither position can be defended rith reason, and so it's all flinging shit and trying to bait the opposition in lieu of making an actual argument.

People here have talked about whether @Jack V Savage is a troll or not. Seeing as he is incapable of making two consecutive posts without lying about pretty much any subject he takes interest in, the question is revealed rhetorical.
 
Last edited:
Man it's actually not even the worst shit he has posted.

Did you see this?
http://forums.sherdog.com/posts/118841251/

http://forums.sherdog.com/posts/112573667/

All of his posts in those threads are chilling..
As they should be. I fully expect you being eventually tried for treason by your fellow countrymen. But you being offended is handy in the sense that it tends to indicate someone, in the thread you're having a tantrum in, having said the truth about something. And the truth is always interesting, if not outright useful.
 
As they should be. I fully expect you being eventually tried for treason by your fellow countrymen. But you being offended is handy in the sense that it tends to indicate someone, in the thread you're having a tantrum in, having said the truth about something. And the truth is always interesting, if not outright useful.

You fully expect that because you're delusional sociopath. Nothing suprising there.

I'm not offended by your posts, I'm disgusted, as your worldview is quite simply revolting. Looking at your signature, you're aware that your hero Breivik actually killed white children right? So much for their future.
Anyway, I probably shouldn't interact with you any furtherer. I'm not qualified to address whatever it is that has malfunctioned in your brain. Please, go knock on the door at the nearest mental asylum.
 
You fully expect that because you're delusional sociopath. Nothing suprising there.
You apparently do not know what a sociopath is and one would be hard pressed to reasonably call me delusional either, considering how many of my predictions have already come to pass. I understand the world quite well.

I'm not offended by your posts, I'm disgusted, as your worldview is quite simply revolting.
Whether you consider my worldview revolting is irrelevant. What you should be concerned about is that it happens to be accurate more often than not. "Disgusted", by the way, is one of the many synonyms for "offended".

Looking at your signature, you're aware that your hero Breivik actually killed white children right? So much for their future.
I am not Norwegian nor is Breivik my hero. An endless influx of foreigners to white countries means there will be no white countries in the future and thus no future for white children. His victims were the future of the corrupt establishment.

Anyway, I probably shouldn't interact with you any furtherer. I'm not qualified to address whatever it is that has malfunctioned in your brain. Please, go knock on the door at the nearest mental asylum.
I have no need of that, considering that of us two, I actually accept the existence of the world outside my head and seek to understand and thrive in it. You, on your part, are simply setting yourself up for a massive, inevitable crash there is a good chance you won't survive, only because you so love ideas that can't survive. I'd prefer that you learned some humility, through it wisdom, and came to the light - even if I see no chance of it happening.

Feel free to add me to your ignore list.
 
As to the last, looking back it was all good for a few laughs.

In addition to our fun back and forth, what's interesting is how the BLM Clinton protest switched people up. Lots of Clinton haters were outraged, while I get portrayed as a big Clinton fan but I was on the side of the protesters.
 
You apparently do not know what a sociopath is and one would be hard pressed to reasonably call me delusional either, considering how many of my predictions have already come to pass. I understand the world quite well.


Whether you consider my worldview revolting is irrelevant. What you should be concerned about is that it happens to be accurate more often than not. "Disgusted", by the way, is one of the many synonyms for "offended".


I am not Norwegian nor is Breivik my hero. An endless influx of foreigners to white countries means there will be no white countries in the future and thus no future for white children. His victims were the future of the corrupt establishment.


I have no need of that, considering that of us two, I actually accept the existence of the world outside my head and seek to understand and thrive in it. You, on your part, are simply setting yourself up for a massive, inevitable crash there is a good chance you won't survive, only because you so love ideas that can't survive. I'd prefer that you learned some humility, through it wisdom, and came to the light - even if I see no chance of it happening.

Feel free to add me to your ignore list.

Just so we are clear, you think it's ok to murder refugees or blacks in the name of national self defense right?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top