War Room Awards 2016

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeesh.

Point is that Bald made a joke, DS misrembered you as being the source of it, and when you saw that, you didn't correct the record--you just repeated bald's joke. That's pretty much what I expect from you so no biggie.

And I missed Bald's joke. Again, it's flattering that everything I do is part of my evil master plan according to your narrative, but sometimes I just miss a post.

Now, just to be clear, I am wantonly, opportunistically dishonest when it suits my purposes, especially on the internet - this is a matter of public admission - but... You really have to go into each hinky thing I'm doing with the question of "What does she gain out of it?" to get a good read on whether I'm fibbing or not. This just doesn't really seem worth it to me. I have my own bad jokes - I don't need to steal Bald's clever ones. But again, Sherhistory will judge us. I think your mind is thoroughly made up about me and the impression I've made on you is delightful ;)

Now, who's made a good post that I can slightly alter and claim for my own a few pages into the thread for some easy likes...
 
Last edited:
Now, who's made a good post that I can slightly alter and claim for my own a few pages into the thread for some easy likes...

Stick with me sister. Nobody reads my shit so if you swipe something you're in the clear.
 
Vulgarity was definitely a theme this year, and I have to agree that @sloppypie takes it. Not for the vulgarity itself, but because his rants used it so well to throw the drumpf vulgarity back in its face. It's just a shame that our resident uneducated white males couldn't get through those posts without taking study breaks.
 
I don't read so much into irrelevancy. It's just disappointing how much dishonesty is engaged in and tolerated around here. Like I was saying to someone else, one of my early experiences in the WR was reading a thread on "jokes" (just basically partisan team-building that painfully attempted to be funny) about Obama that were falsely attributed to various late-night talk-show hosts. I corrected the record, and a bunch of people were infuriated about it. I hadn't encountered WR-style political discussions before (like, people I knew either didn't follow or care about politics at all or they were smart and decent), and I was shocked that "telling the truth is good and lying is bad" was regarded as a partisan sentiment and not something universally agreed on. Petey did something similar in another thread and just attacked me when I pointed out his error (while Anung posted a hilarious theory that I was trying to distract from the cited piece, even though I agreed with the portion of it I read--didn't even occur to him that others value truth).

Anyway, what do you think I miss the mark on that "actually matters" (matters more than decency)?

Honest question: Do you drink and post?

*Edit*

Or are you on any meds?
 
Last edited:
Ark is bottom half for me. Can't remember him posting anything interesting.

Consider the kind of posters that Jack considers to be top half over the years, this is a much welcomed relief.
 
Vulgarity was definitely a theme this year, and I have to agree that @sloppypie takes it. Not for the vulgarity itself, but because his rants used it so well to throw the drumpf vulgarity back in its face. It's just a shame that our resident uneducated white males couldn't get through those posts without taking study breaks.
Says the guy who's been banned multiple times for making racist comments. :eek:
 
Consider the kind of posters that Jack considers to be top half over the years, this is a much welcomed relief.
His nominee for Best Poster has been banned multiple times for trolling and racist comments. :D
 
Consider the kind of posters that Jack considers to be top half over the years, this is a much welcomed relief.

Fawlty, FD, Pan, Zank, waigu, Rex, AngryCrow, Gandhi, Lead, Rup, thegreata, Meathead Mike, Limbo, JDragon, Nickerson, Quipling, Upa, Denter, Possum, JohnnyRingo, K1LG, etc. All idiots who you would not want to be associated with, right?

Can't even think of a single shitty poster I've praised that would justify this type of remark. If we're talking over the years, in this thread I mentioned Oracle, GermanBJJ, mkess, unc, Lee, National Acrobat, sqr, BKMMAfan and more. All chumps, too?

Ed: I have said that I like glennrod. I know he's not too sharp, but he's entertainingly crazy, and I think he's an OK cat; just a little misguided.
 
Last edited:
The 2016 election thread was by far one of the most entertaining threads in Sherdog history. There will never be another one like it because there will never be a more entertaining election in our lifetimes. It wasn't big on info but it was the best in terms of dialogue, shitposting, and a goldmine to re-read from start to finish (which I did in parts, took about five days to work my way through but it was so worth it).

I completely missed out on that Election Day PBP action because I signed up to run the local polling place, just to make sure there wouldn't be any shenanigans in my part of town on Election day.

(FYI, it certainly wasn't as bad like the shit that went down in my special WR report on "Donald J. Trump's Mostly-Peaceful California Tour 2016: Of Liberals and Cholos" a few months ago, though we did have to regulate quite a few "activists" who showed up to vote wearing "With Her" and "MAGA" memorabilias - as well as the shills who tried to line the parking entrance with campaign posters - before things can spirral out of hand. Seriously, who does that shit?!)

Pretty much swamped with electronic/paper ballots and angry voters who stares daggers at one another until the poll closes, though I did tried to sneak a peak at the live updates from my laptop at the back table every now and then just to see the U.S electoral map steadily turning red and the mood on MSNBC and CNN gradually transitioning from Excitement to Self-Reassuring to Worrying to complete Meltdown.

Sherdoggers in the War Room must have had a blast watching and commenting in real time!
 
Given the passes we gave over 911 or as far back as the Beirut bombings during Reagan, I really start to tune out when it becomes a he said / she said over who thought what / when for the motives of the attack. It's highly partisan BS not designed to get to the bottom of anything.
People were pissed because it was election season lies. you didn't tune out the fact that they created a false narrative tho? pointing that out is not partisan.
 
Ed: I have said that I like glennrod. I know he's not too sharp, but he's entertainingly crazy, and I think he's an OK cat; just a little misguided.

Honestly, that's quite amusing coming from you of all people, Jack. I've got news for you: You are not very sharp. You are, however, somewhat educated and able to use that to disguise your intellectual flaws but anyone here worth their salt can see you for who you are - or in this case, aren't. And one thing we are for certain about is that you, Jack, aren't very sharp.
 
Honestly, that's quite amusing coming from you of all people, Jack. I've got news for you: You are not very sharp. You are, however, somewhat educated and able to use that to disguise your intellectual flaws but anyone here worth their salt can see you for who you are - or in this case, aren't. And one thing we are for certain about is that you, Jack, aren't very sharp.

Jack is super sharp. A more obvious example of what you claim is Pan. I'd tag him in but I've said this to him and he got pissy last time (I tagged him in for something).
 
Lol. Yup. This thread is turning out exactly as I thought it would, and of course, as it should. Fantastic work ladies and gentlemen. :)
 
Lol. Yup. This thread is turning out exactly as I thought it would, and of course, as it should. Fantastic work ladies and gentlemen. :)

giphy.gif
 
Lol. Yup. This thread is turning out exactly as I thought it would, and of course, as it should. Fantastic work ladies and gentlemen. :)

This like Carlos Mencia vs Joe Rogan all over again
 
Says the guy who's been banned multiple times for making racist comments. :eek:
Feel free to show that I've ever been banned (or even carded) for racist comments. Strange lie to throw out there. Would you like to bet your account on that?
 
Honestly, that's quite amusing coming from you of all people, Jack. I've got news for you: You are not very sharp. You are, however, somewhat educated and able to use that to disguise your intellectual flaws but anyone here worth their salt can see you for who you are - or in this case, aren't. And one thing we are for certain about is that you, Jack, aren't very sharp.

So your whole gimmick is Jack ankle-biter now. Cool.

BTW, you previously said that you weren't always part of the WR right hivemind. What changed?
 
So your whole gimmick is Jack ankle-biter now. Cool.

BTW, you previously said that you weren't always part of the WR right hivemind. What changed?

Be truthful with yourself, Jack. You practically begged for my engagement when you dropped my name.

And yet you claim to value honesty. Tsk tsk.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top