War Room Awards 2016

Status
Not open for further replies.
Arkain2K said:
If there's really going to be a tally, I suggest @Lead to rename this thread "War Room Awards 2016 - The Official Nominations", and move all the discussion posts to a separate thread entitled "War Room Awards 2016 - The Discussions".

I've done something similar when I organized Sherdog's TUF 20 Fantasy League, and it really cleared up the clutters:

http://forums.sherdog.com/threads/t...ion-analysis-registered-players-only.2790011/
Click to expand...

I can rename it. Someone else needs to come up with the list of noms and maybe I guess make the poll for the best poster since it's the main one
 
Last edited:
Final Rehab said:
No one missed you.
200w.gif
Click to expand...

But you remember me. ;)
 
WandyWiolentFan said:
You're the only person here ive ever seen call @EGarrett a troll. Go ahead and provide evidence to support your claim that he has a long history of trolling.
Click to expand...

In addition to any evidence you provide, @Jack V Savage, I feel we should bring this issue to the WR moderation team. Surely, a poster with years and years of trolling under his belt - as you claim is the case with @EGarrett - should easily be identifiable as a troll by our fine moderator staff?


Btw- This is where you lose again, Jack.
 
Last edited:
WandyWiolentFan said:
In addition to any evidence you provide, I feel we should bring this issue to the WR moderation team. Surely, a poster with years and years of trolling under his belt - as you claim is the case with @EGarrett - should easily be identifiable as a troll by our fine moderator staff?


Btw- This is where you lose again, Jack.
Click to expand...
You just quoted you own post without even tagging him, dawg
 
WandyWiolentFan said:
LOL fixed.

Wouldn't want him to ignore it.
Click to expand...
For future reference, if you edit in a tag, the tagged poster won't get notified. The best way is to copy a post, delete it, then paste in a new post with the tag.
 
WandyWiolentFan said:
You're the only person here ive ever seen call @EGarrett a troll. Go ahead and provide evidence to support your claim that he has a long history of trolling.
Click to expand...

I don't care to. I'm deciding that on my own, but apparently he's melting down in this thread.

WandyWiolentFan said:
But you're not losing respect and credibility simply because of your beliefs; youre losing respect and credibility because you are absolutely unwilling to defend your beliefs when issued a challenge by someone of superior intellect.
Click to expand...

I'm always absolutely willing to defend my beliefs when issued a challenge by anyone I respect. Is it your view that second sight, Budden, Big Chief Stove, Garrett, etc. are the cream of the crop here, and the people I do argue with--Zank, Pan, Greoric, Anung, Ehtheist, IGIT, Madmick, etc.--are the "kiddie pool"? It seems rather the opposite to me. I think you know that and are just trying to get one in on someone who has made you feel bad about yourself. And, BTW, note that I am always happy to engage you if you make a serious post. Do you consider yourself to be one of the kiddie-pool posters?
 
Jack V Savage said:
You have Garrett on ignore, too?

I agree it looks really weird when you only see the responses but you can tell someone is melting down.
Click to expand...
You're a scared little girl who just tries to talk around other people.
 
Jack V Savage said:
I don't care to. I'm deciding that on my own, but apparently he's melting down in this thread.



I'm always absolutely willing to defend my beliefs when issued a challenge by anyone I respect. Is it your view that second sight, Budden, Big Chief Stove, Garrett, etc. are the cream of the crop here, and the people I do argue with--Zank, Pan, Greoric, Anung, Ehtheist, IGIT, Madmick, etc.--are the "kiddie pool"? It seems rather the opposite to me. I think you know that and are just trying to get one in on someone who has made you feel bad about yourself. And, BTW, note that I am always happy to engage you if you make a serious post. Do you consider yourself to be one of the kiddie-pool posters?
Click to expand...
Nope. You fell back to this "tactic" after I corrected on basic things like the meaning of "corruption" and "ad hominems." Oh, and you have quoted me recently to try to post a meme in response to me mocking your failed presidential campaign, so no, I wasn't on ignore.

Substance is where I reign. You've been pushed out of that and have nothing left but childish evasion.
 
WandyWiolentFan said:
In addition to any evidence you provide, @Jack V Savage, I feel we should bring this issue to the WR moderation team. Surely, a poster with years and years of trolling under his belt - as you claim is the case with @EGarrett - should easily be identifiable as a troll by our fine moderator staff?


Btw- This is where you lose again, Jack.
Click to expand...
I agree with this completely. I've asked the mods in the past what the standard is and requested that they review people's behavior, since the ad hominem tactics by Jack V. Savage create a lot of the negative environment.
 
Arkain2K said:
Hey look, Mr. Procrastinator finally shows! :D
Click to expand...

I know I said I would do it after the election but I gut usurped, I wanted to wait until I could put some real effort into it but what got this instead..........
 
EGarrett said:
I do it all the time in the appropriate threads. For example...

http://forums.sherdog.com/posts/124728999/

Jack backs down or acts like he doesn't see it. Tell him to take me on. It's at the point now where the liberal posters like Limbo Pete just try to spam or say "what were we talking about??" as an attempt to save face and avoid any real issue.
Click to expand...

Well that was a let down.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,681
Messages
58,311,313
Members
175,997
Latest member
joshvegas

Share this page

Back
Top