War Room Awards 2016

Status
Not open for further replies.
SMEAC said:
Goggle is your friend if you don't know what a fairly common term is
Click to expand...

Around these parts we call crackheads pipe hitters. You know.... because they like to hit the pipe. I'll graciously accept being a hard worker to get results though.
 
Last edited:
jgarner said:
Around these parts we call crackheads pipe hitters. You know.... because they like to hit the pipe. I'll graciously accept being a hard worker to get results though.
Click to expand...
It's probably something to do with all of us being crayon eating marine grunts.
 
Jack V Savage said:
Strong candidate, but Hans did great work in that category this year. Not only should he win it, it should be named after him.
Click to expand...


True, they were bad in different ways. He was mostly about making propaganda threads to push his agenda throughout the election. The Sausage King's threads are more about whatever thoughts seem to be passing through his head at the time, like tumbleweeds passing through the desert.
 
Worst poster - m3t4t0n

Biggest libtard - jack savage
 
Jack V Savage said:
well-that-escalated-jmg8n6.jpg


In the spirit of the season, I'll pull you off ignore (at least until you decide to start spamming ads again). Your reaction is silly, though. I twice politely asked you to stop the spamathon, and you reacted by angrily refusing and telling me to put you on ignore if you I don't like it. I did, and now you act outraged by that (and laughably claim that it's because "I got my ass handed to me" when I've barely interacted with you and regularly engage with posters who are far superior to you). You're not as bad as a lot of the other candidates for worst poster when you try to post seriously, but the habit you had of attacking threads and making them unreadable earned you the top spot.
Click to expand...
Spamathon = posting relevant info to the topic.

Trust me sweetheart, putting me on ignore is a badge of honor. And yes, you ignored me because you couldn't win via attrition (since grasping basic concepts that run contradictory to your own seems to be beyond you - hot tip: no one is perfect, admit when you're wrong and move on, people will like you better). Walls of text don't work; the info you post is what's relevant, not the size of it, which might scare off other people. Also, try not to selectively choose only the points in someone's reply that you can spin into a eternal quibble. Address the argument as a whole and ADMIT when you have a bias that prevents you from even understanding the other side of the argument.

In the spirit of the holidays, I will say that on some topics, you're a super bright guy. How about that.
 
Jack V Savage said:
Strong candidate, but Hans did great work in that category this year. Not only should he win it, it should be named after him.
Click to expand...

It is an honor to be nominated as worst poster of the year from Hack Vag Savaged.

I know I must have done something right.

That is the highest honor coming from Hack
 
sodapopinski said:
Spamathon = posting relevant info to the topic.
Click to expand...

Silly pictures glorifying a presidential candidate and bad jokes = "relevant info to the topic"? Incredibly disingenuous of you to make that claim.

sodapopinski said:
Trust me sweetheart, putting me on ignore is a badge of honor. And yes, you ignored me because you couldn't win via attrition (since grasping basic concepts that run contradictory to your own seems to be beyond you - hot tip: no one is perfect, admit when you're wrong and move on, people will like you better).
Click to expand...

I know you like to think that--to put a positive spin on it, but it's absurd, and I think you realize that. I argue with Zank, ehtheist, Pan, the greata, Rod, Greoric, and many others. You're on the same level as Anung or Viva (and have a similar character), but I argue with them. The people I don't bother with are people who you would objectively recognize as bad posters, and I ignored you only because your response to my polite request for you to stop spam-bombing threads was to tell me to ignore you. You were easily the smartest poster on my ignore list (that's no great compliment). If you could see my list, there's no way you'd think it's a badge of honor to be on it, and you'd realize how silly the "you ignore me because I'm such a great poster" is. I like arguing with people I think are good at it.
 
Jack V Savage said:
Silly pictures glorifying a presidential candidate and bad jokes = "relevant info to the topic"? Incredibly disingenuous of you to make that claim.



I know you like to think that--to put a positive spin on it, but it's absurd, and I think you realize that. I argue with Zank, ehtheist, Pan, the greata, Rod, Greoric, and many others. You're on the same level as Anung or Viva (and have a similar character), but I argue with them. The people I don't bother with are people who you would objectively recognize as bad posters, and I ignored you only because your response to my polite request for you to stop spam-bombing threads was to tell me to ignore you. You were easily the smartest poster on my ignore list (that's no great compliment). If you could see my list, there's no way you'd think it's a badge of honor to be on it, and you'd realize how silly the "you ignore me because I'm such a great poster" is. I like arguing with people I think are good at it.
Click to expand...
Actually, you're a pseudointellectual contrarian who builds faulty premises that you try to conceal with obscure data that you don't even fully understand. Like when you went around insulting people thinking that it wasn't "ad hominem" if it wasn't phrased as an argument, and I embarrassed you by showing you what "ad hominem" really means.

That was of course just the first time I did things like that to you. After awhile you tried replying without quoting me, hoping I wouldn't get the notification, then when that didn't work, you started making up excuses not to reply.

What's funny is that previously you tried to build your ego on being "substantive" and people not wanting to argue with you. Now you no longer have that as an out, so you're the one who makes up excuses. And any weak little meme you post, I can respond to with a meme. If you try to talk around me, I can talk around you. You will gain nothing.

By the way, congratulations on tying for 4th place in the election. That didn't work out for you either. Your illusions of popularity and of being the best argumentative poster are all collapsing.

*smooch*
 
Hans Gruber said:
It is an honor to be nominated as worst poster of the year from Hack Vag Savaged.

I know I must have done something right.

That is the highest honor coming from Hack
Click to expand...
It's time for the moderators to get Little Jack in line. Control his flaming towards other posters and tell him to back up what he says with substantive discussion, at which point I'll sweep him out of here. He has no chance whatsoever.
 
You guys don't take yourselves too seriously, at all.

reverse-1305865316_cute_girls_reaction.gif
 
AgedFlatus said:
What you did there...
Click to expand...

Seriously, this page at least is pretty impressive. Three interchangeable bottom-tier posters (not sure if EG, SMEAC, or THP were quoted or actually posted), plus soda and Hans.
 
EGarrett said:
Actually, you're a pseudointellectual contrarian who builds faulty premises that you try to conceal with obscure data that you don't even fully understand. Like when you went around insulting people thinking that it wasn't "ad hominem" if it wasn't phrased as an argument, and I embarrassed you by showing you what "ad hominem" really means.

That was of course just the first time I did things like that to you. After awhile you tried replying without quoting me, hoping I wouldn't get the notification, then when that didn't work, you started making up excuses not to reply.

What's funny is that previously you tried to build your ego on being "substantive" and people not wanting to argue with you. Now you no longer have that as an out, so you're the one who makes up excuses. And any weak little meme you post, I can respond to with a meme. If you try to talk around me, I can talk around you. You will gain nothing.

By the way, congratulations on tying for 4th place in the election. That didn't work out for you either. Your illusions of popularity and of being the best argumentative poster are all collapsing.

*smooch*
Click to expand...
Delusions of Granduer Award: EGarrett
 
Limbo Pete said:
Delusions of Granduer Award: EGarrett
Click to expand...
Oh really, so tell your friend Jack to try me out then. :) I invited him to explain why the Harvard study didn't support Trump's claims of bias. He thought he had a clever little argument there. He backed down as always.

(and don't use words you can't spell)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,466
Messages
58,286,986
Members
175,994
Latest member
Doomer

Share this page

Back
Top