Social WAR ROOM 2023 AWARDS.

How do we want to decide winners?


  • Total voters
    46
Status
Not open for further replies.
Lmao no. He’s what I call a “spaghetti at the wall poster.” He throws out 8 million dumbshit CT theories and bogus talking points, which are easily debunkable. But it takes time and effort to debunk them, you can’t begin to have an honest debate until you get past them, and you’ll never get past them because as soon as you do he’ll throw out 8 million more to see what sticks. It’s a cheap debate tactic to get the other person always playing defense, and maybe it worked for him in his 7th grade debate class or something and be never moved past it.

One time, he posted a pic that was supposedly of Detroit in ruins due to Democrat policies. It was actually a picture of a plant which was scheduled for demolition. When I pointed it out, do you think he said “oh shit, my bad,” or owned up to his bullshit? Lol nope, he just moved right on to his next bullshit talking point <45>

Nah. I mean...maybe sometimes LOL. But he seems to hold his own fine from what I see.

Keep in mind I also think you're a damn good poster although we aren't generally super close ideologically.
 
BOOM! Penelope Bourbon with Rose Cask Finish, and a Four Roses Small Batch Select tonight. Nothing too fancy, but something to sip while I enjoy the Newsom-DeSantis debate.

Having some full proof Weller and a Side Project Anniversary blend I've been sitting on since 2019, along with a 2023 TG Assassin. Cheers, my friend.
 
Having some full proof Weller and a Side Project Anniversary blend I've been sitting on since 2019, along with a 2023 TG Assassin. Cheers, my friend.
Oooooh you win :)
I’ve never actually had a Weller Full Proof but would really like one. Happy Birthday man! When Heavies Awards begins, you’re my nom for Mod of the Year btw.
 
Lmao no. He’s what I call a “spaghetti at the wall poster.” He throws out 8 million dumbshit CT theories and bogus talking points, which are easily debunkable. But it takes time and effort to debunk them, you can’t begin to have an honest debate until you get past them, and you’ll never get past them because as soon as you do he’ll throw out 8 million more to see what sticks. It’s a cheap debate tactic to get the other person always playing defense, and maybe it worked for him in his 7th grade debate class or something and be never moved past it.

One time, he posted a pic that was supposedly of Detroit in ruins due to Democrat policies. It was actually a picture of a plant which was scheduled for demolition. When I pointed it out, do you think he said “oh shit, my bad,” or owned up to his bullshit? Lol nope, he just moved right on to his next bullshit talking point <45>
Terrible poster, but credit where credit is due, @nostradumbass has to be one of the most accurate handles to describe a poster's posting style that I've ever come across.

Shit, even after the trial was over he was still going with "gay sex gone wrong" for the motivation behind the Paul Pelosi attack. Plenty of his chud brothers liked it too. This is apparently an example of the high-level discourse they value him highly for.
 
Terrible poster, but credit where credit is due, @nostradumbass has to be one of the most accurate handles to describe a poster's posting style that I've ever come across.

Shit, even after the trial was over he was still going with "gay sex gone wrong" for the motivation behind the Paul Pelosi attack. Plenty of his chud brothers liked it too. This is apparently an example of the high-level discourse they value him highly for.
I always think that too about his username. If I read one his posts—and honestly, I just scroll past them quite a bit—I always think, “welp username checks out.”
 
Terrible poster, but credit where credit is due, @nostradumbass has to be one of the most accurate handles to describe a poster's posting style that I've ever come across.

Shit, even after the trial was over he was still going with "gay sex gone wrong" for the motivation behind the Paul Pelosi attack. Plenty of his chud brothers liked it too. This is apparently an example of the high-level discourse they value him highly for.

Holy retarded, you thought "Paul Pelosi is definitely planning some conjugal visits" was a serious post? That's almost as depressing as reading someone making a joke at Paul Pelosi's expense, and checking back on it pages later to see who "liked" it.

{<jordan}
 
Terrible poster, but credit where credit is due, @nostradumbass has to be one of the most accurate handles to describe a poster's posting style that I've ever come across.

Shit, even after the trial was over he was still going with "gay sex gone wrong" for the motivation behind the Paul Pelosi attack. Plenty of his chud brothers liked it too. This is apparently an example of the high-level discourse they value him highly for.


I thought the AZ voter fraud thread was an all time low for the subforum but then that story might’ve topped it. If people are just trolling, that’s fine but don’t expect me to take you seriously anymore. Taking the gay lover stance is either vile or trolling, either way it’s something to be ashamed of.
 
Best Poster: @SakurabasEar, @senri , @Mr Holmes , @SakurabasEar , @S Class , @LeonardoBjj , @CantCucktheTuck , @GearSolidMetal , @panem-et-circenses and @Siver! When he's not inebriated

Worst Poster: Everyone I disagree with politically

Best Wr Av: @LMP and @Andy Capp

Best Wr Hair : @Wadtucket and @BFoe

Best Wr Sausage Maker: @LangfordBarrow

Best Wr supporting actress: @Rational Poster and @AWilder

Best Mod: all the mods, I dont want their job

And the Bertrand Russell achievement award goes to! @Super_Nintendo
How many links do you need this week Mr. Ear? :p
 
  • Like
Reactions: LMP
I always think that too about his username. If I read one his posts—and honestly, I just scroll past them quite a bit—I always think, “welp username checks out.”
Lol, you've made several posts about me in this thread, one of which was some creepy novella where you sifted back years to find a post calling Detroit a toilet for you to post "aha, they actually demolished one of the abandoned buildings, so Detroit is kicking ass", because "honestly I just scroll past his posts".

You spend an awful lot of time thinking about someone whose posts you claim to "scroll right past", whereas you apparently post nearly 10,000 times/year and I haven't noticed you at all.
 
Starman went from the greatest sore winner you ever saw to the greatest sore loser you ever saw in a matter of hours. Reaching the antipodes in such a short timeframe caused him to release so much energy he spontaneously combusted. RIP.
I remember that whole meltdown happening during election night, while I was sleeping and missed it all, but he's actually a good guy when I venture into the Mayberry and see him there.
 
It was hilarious. I fully believe in owning your bullshit. If I make some crazy prediciton and I’m deadass wrong, I’ll own it. He’s a weird poster in that I like talking MMA with him. He’s a big Fedor fan, and that video game he uses as an AV is one I loved and played as a kid.

But his politics are ugly AF, and his integrity seems even worse.
I feel that way about @cottagecheesefan who's completely delusional when it comes to Trump but is a good boxing fan outside the WR.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top