yeah... no that's not happening. You thinking Weidman is overrated pretty much disqualifies anything you said after that.
Why? It's not a terribly unpopular opinion.
Lol @ Weidman has no notable wins.
He had Machida but beyond that; naysayers have an argument and you'll have to accept it.
You're saying Vitor isn't a notable win while predicting he's going to be champ. Pretty strong logic right there.
Cancer was never a true contender and world hunger is old and past it's prime.KO cancer, and submit world hunger, and they'd still call him a lucky champ with no good wins.
Yes, i know he's TRT'less, old and in decline, but consider the following scenario ...........
1. Rockhold beats Weidman (liklely).
.
Wins over :
#1 P4P fighter and #1 Middleweight - Anderson
Top 5 P4P and #2 Middleweight- Anderson
Top 5 ranked Mark Munoz
Top 5 ranked Demian Maia
#2 ranked middleweight- Vitor
top 5 ranked middleweight machida.
None of this counts as notable wins? I guess top 5 wins are worthless.
Not true! Cancer was on a million-fight win streak (I'm awful) and world hunger was P4P Top 10 in most children's Christmas lists.Cancer was never a true contender and world hunger is old and past it's prime.
Facts? Those are your opinions! All of those are great wins. FactEveryone had said vitor without trt would be no threat.
Maia was. .ok.
Munoz? ! Even you could beat him.
Anderson? Oh you're just baiting me. Sorry kiddo, i don't care for fights that end with an asshole giving it away it another with a crazy injury.
These are the facts.
Everyone had said vitor without trt would be no threat.
Maia was. .ok.
Munoz? ! Even you could beat him.
Anderson? Oh you're just baiting me. Sorry kiddo, i don't care for fights that end with an asshole giving it away it another with a crazy injury.
These are the facts.
You're saying Vitor isn't a notable win while predicting he's going to be champ. Pretty strong logic right there.