- Joined
- Nov 19, 2011
- Messages
- 61,921
- Reaction score
- 131,131
Yes...they're about as good a sample as you can get for a games quality. You are doing ridiculous gymnastics to try and give random streamers who have never played the game (or your dad Mr. Musk) over people who literally bought and played it.
Streamers have literally streamed themselves playing the game, unlike the publication reviewers who may have played it like....
Or are constantly complaining about the difficulty in FromSoft games, which is basically an admittion they play games they review on the easiest difficulty to beat the game quicker.
So big swing and miss by you to imply 'gaming journalists' are more qualified gamers than streamers, who actually do prove they play games well. It's basically a requirement to become popular.
Oh I have no doubt about that.Your logic makes no sense. New gamers played and reviewed Veilguard,

Never said any of that.just like new gamers played and reviewed Origins and every other game in history. Your logic is that new gamers only affected the reviews of this one game, which is clearly not true since new gamers are constantly joining the market.
You're at the point in the discussion you're making up what I said and arguing against that.
Not really.And guess what affects a game...its development. Jesus lol.
Witcher 3 & Cyberpunk2077 are two of the five best games released in this and last decade, and both of their developments were nightmares for the developers.
Are you really going to keep going with the 'Great games have smooth developments' myth you just made up?
I have no idea who that it is,

Of course you don't.
and 