- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
- Messages
- 7,858
- Reaction score
- 4,943
Why didn't Michael Johnson defeat Beniel Dariush at UFC Fight Night 73? The question isn't meant to evaluate whether we personally agree with the judges awarding Dariush the split decision victory, but rather, why there was controversy in the first place? The judges themselves were not unanimous and neither was the audience watching. If there's smoke, is there also verifiable fire?
It turns out, we might be able to tap into what drives the belief among some that Johnson deserved the nod if we look at more than just the aggregate striking totals. After all, those numbers are very close and while important, don't settle the debate in and of themselves.
For most observers, there is general agreement Johnson's striking was more effective in the first while Dariush the clear winner of the third, leaving the second round the epicenter of the dispute. Johnson outlanded Dariush numerically in that frame, but it was perhaps spatially that tells us the most about what happened in that round with the help of Fightmetric's new 'heatmaps', a new data visualization tool that displays the movement of each fighter over the course of a round in the UFC:
http://www.mmafighting.com/2015/8/16/9161835/heat-maps-and-the-next-frontier-in-fight-data
This is kinda interessting. I'm not sure it would really help in judging, but it's good information.