Crime Use it in a Sentence (special counsel thread v. 25)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, he's a lawyer and was in charge of that area of government. I'm sure he has his biases, but if he can make a case for acquitting Trump, so can a good defense lawyer(lol and I'm not sure I mean Rudy Giuliani ). Can you imagine Rudy defending Don in court. Thing would be comedic gold.


Prosecutor - Mr. Giuliani, where was Donald J. Trump on the evening of October 4th, 2016?

Giuliani - Listen, he might have murdered that lady, but he didn't bur-. He didn't commit a crime. I tell you, he's a moron, I just don't know if he knew intent. What was the question?
 
Lmfao at you using dindus... I thought the left found that disgustingly racist?

Calling anonymous people with no discernible race on a message who say "trump dindu nuffin" is racist? Please explain, snowflake.
 
Last edited:
And yet the righties creamed their pampers for every seat they gained on any level, for years.

I wasn’t one of those people. I thought those people sounded like retards. Counting local elections on the national stage is for pathetic losers.
 
So did the reporters uncover who it was that was fighting his/her subpoena in court today?
Just the lawyers from Muellers office. This seems to be the same case that requested an en banc hearing after initial ruling (all dc circuit judges review[one recused the one appointed by tRUmp])


This appeal is moving at the speed of light for a sensitive issue
 
Did you read the OP? Do you understand why the judged ordered a document release? Do you understand an original 302 form from Flynn's interview is missing and why that is relevant?

I don't see how it's relevant to him pleading guilty.
 
https://www.politico.com/amp/story/2018/12/14/sarah-sanders-trump-inauguration-spending-1064503

Should this scandal have its own thread?

White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders is denying that President Donald Trump had any knowledge of possible malfeasance by his inaugural committee, which is reportedly under investigation for misusing funds.

"That doesn't have anything to do with the president or the first lady," Sanders told reporters Thursday evening outside the White House regarding the investigation.
 
Interesting.
I would imagine it's not just Manny that was advising him on shenanigans. So many criminals.

What gets me is keeping people under investigation around/ignoring warnings (Flynn).
These people have a rather flagrant disregard for ethics.

Seriously LOL at a fkin democrat crying about ethics.
 
I think there is a chance he rides off into the sunset while Pence takes the reigns. I think you read into what I said a bit too far or perhaps I was ambiguous. If Trump wants it in 2020, its his
Of course Trump wants to remain in power. If he rides off into the sunset it'll be in cuffs or due to some kind of bargain to keep him out of jail.
 
It's tyranny. Manafort is a louse on a personal level, but none of his Trump dealings have anything to do with his prosecution, except his association. These are attacks on political opponents, using the government, which is tyranny.

Perhaps he was only charged because of his association with Trump - doesn't change the fact that he committed the crimes and has now been caught.

Perhaps he should have kept a low profile and his criminal activity wouldn't have been detected
 
no

also obama paid rev wright 250k to not talk during his election

I love this one thrown out here. I did a quick google search on your claim and came up empty.

Wright claim Obama asked him not to speak until after Tempe election because the media would eat him alive, not because Wright had damming evidence Obama did something illegal. And from the story Wright claims a close friend of Obama offered him $150K. Apples and Oranges dude.
 
Seriously LOL at a fkin democrat crying about ethics.
Deflection of the brainless. Democrats have nothing to do with Trump's sphere of ridiculous ethical bankruptcy. Stay on topic.
 
LOL

The Trump Crime Family is just about one red cunt-hair's width from imploding.
more like slowly melting...it's sociologically interesting watching the defenses continue. At some point, the defense will be, with no other rational avenue...blank stares followed by "I disagree". Zero caveats.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top