First, an exceptionally stupid part of the country will object to a "liberal arts" education just because it has "liberal arts" in the title.
Second, an exceptionally short-sighted part of the country will object to it because it's not driven by an emphasis on STEM subjects. The trivium itself is just grammar, logic and rhetoric. There is math in it of course but many Americans think we need more STEM emphasis, not less.
Third, it's extremely difficult to measure through traditional standardized testing methods. And there is a large part of the country that wants measurable education goals.
Essentially, a classical liberal arts education isn't about job readiness and, right now, a lot of Americans want education to be something that helps you get a job.
I understood him just fine.Thanks for explaining a classical education to me, I never heard about it at the university where I got a degree in history lmao
I think you're misunderstanding what the poster you were responding to means when he says the 'Prussian system' which wasn't designed to create workers. It was designed to create soldiers who didn't question orders.
i don't think americans would like the answer to that.I think it would be a good idea for educational leaders to visit and see how countries complete there schooling where it is effective. There is nothing wrong with adapting the American system - we can learn lessons from schools all over the world.
That's the thing with modern education. With the introduction of the computer and coding and similar professions, education shifted to finding people smart enough to the logic based reasoning necessary to excel in those fields. It led to a de-emphasis on the cultivation of the creative side of education.In the same way that once the calculator became widespread, you didn't really need to be able to do maths any more (most people in most contexts), with AI you won't really need to be able to do geography or art or whatever any more. Just give the AI the correct instructions.
- You guys arent subject to standarts?Hey I know, kets disband all public education and privatize it entirely! Let's also not subject any private institutions to standardization or performance assessment. Oh and we'll funnel public money to religious schools. That will fix everything! Well, for rich kids, but that's cool, too.
- My nephew wanted a video-game. When he got one, he cond't play.These two are it.
There is an astounding level of apathy among kids these days. Absolutely everything bores them to tears. It's not that 30 years ago kids were dying to learn precal and chemistry but they at least accepted that that's what you were in school for and just buckled down and did it.
Nowadays, smartphones have them so hooked that it's an escape from learning. Before, school kinda "trapped" them into learning because they had no other choice, but now they can just be on their phones or laptops all day. Even more so once they get home. Before, you had to wait a while until your favorite TV shows came on. Now, they're on and available 24/7 so why bother with homework when you can be on YouTube all night?
On top of that, their attention spans have been pulverized by smartphones.
Agreed. There's no getting away from 15 sec videos and 280 characters max lim at this point.The classical Western liberal arts education. Good luck getting modern Americans to sign on to it. Maybe if they rebrand it.
- Brazil scores are going down also. Kids are getting dumber as the minutes go by.The Asian and white students in the country are still doing well. Their scores havent changed at all.
- It's affects more developing brins. tHat's why is unffair to point people of a contrie of subnutrition and point their IQ's.Regarding the first point I would guess it could have more of an effect on developing brains than adults.
I don't have a counter point to the second one though.
People say that but I think that's a bit of a cop out.These two are it.
There is an astounding level of apathy among kids these days. Absolutely everything bores them to tears. It's not that 30 years ago kids were dying to learn precal and chemistry but they at least accepted that that's what you were in school for and just buckled down and did it.
Nowadays, smartphones have them so hooked that it's an escape from learning. Before, school kinda "trapped" them into learning because they had no other choice, but now they can just be on their phones or laptops all day. Even more so once they get home. Before, you had to wait a while until your favorite TV shows came on. Now, they're on and available 24/7 so why bother with homework when you can be on YouTube all night?
On top of that, their attention spans have been pulverized by smartphones.
That won't be the problem.Agreed. There's no getting away from 15 sec videos and 280 characters max lim at this point.
I spent many hours in school learning how to calculate unknown angles of triangles, solve quadratic equations, finding out how oxbow lakes are formed and how many electrons orbit around various nuclei etc. And although some of it was interesting, I have never needed that information. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 30 minutes of learning how to jack up a vehicle and change the wheel, or solder, was worth more than 100 hours of that stuff.People say that but I think that's a bit of a cop out.
Kids are apathetic to school because it is pointless. Let me flesh that out. What possible use is there for the modern high school education? Go to college? Okay but that just means the high school education didn't matter for it's own merit. It only mattered to get you to the place where education will matter - college. Or you go to the trades -- which again isn't based on your high school education.
If we don't want apathy then high school has to have intrinsic value and, right now, it doesn't.
Personally, I've been saying for years that we need to completely revamp high school so that kids leave high school ready to contribute to society. College or trade school really shouldn't be necessary for anyone who finishes high school.
- Brazil scores are going down also. Kids are getting dumber as the minutes go by.
I guess the asian kids depend of the generation they're in. You guys will dumber them also.
I completely agree with that. Kids aren't stupid. They know that most of this stuff is useless except to help them get into college. And a lot of them know they aren't going to college or, at least, not to a college where this stuff matters.I spent many hours in school learning how to calculatre unknown angles of triangles, solve quadratic equations, finding out how oxbow lakes are formed and how many electrons orbit around various molecules etc. And although some of it was interesting, I have never needed that information. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 30 minutes of learning how to jack up a vehicle and change the wheel, or solder, was worth more than 100 hours of that stuff.