International US AID was necessary, proof is documented.

nonoob

nonoob

Silver Belt
@Silver
Joined
Mar 4, 2023
Messages
11,184
Reaction score
18,050
Congress gets down with the Fax on Musk's scam. Congress woman AOC's team and Erica Y "Shred & Burn" Carr's midnight signed message sent concerning ALL documents and USAID payment recipients.


 
lol my sister went on a rant about 'our global reputation' or some other rot. 'The world hates us now!"

my lady friend at the gym refused to go on her yearly Euro vacay because she's 'ashamed of being American.'

puhleeze. most of the world has never like America IMO. Europe especially. 'fat americans in shorts wanting ketchup for
their pomme frites!'

America is regarded as the 'world's bitch' with tons of money on the offer for nebulous, oftentimes nefarious, causes.
'what about child vaccinations in Africa? that's surely in our interest to provide...remind me why.

Why is the richest, most powerful empire on planet earth somehow obligated to bail out less ambitious, dedicated countries?

I'll wait.
 
Between 2007-2017, US exports grew 3 times faster to USAID partner countries than to countries who weren’t.
66% of our growth in exports over the past 20 years have been to USAID partner countries.

Organizations like USAID are the actual way to work toward making up these trade deficits that Trump keeps babbling like an idiot about. His backwards-ass plan is to kill an organization that helps us grow exports and make up the difference by taxing the fuck out of us.
Additionally, the 2-3 billion dollars worth of food they distributed to the world’s hungry came from US farmers, so Trump’s plan fucks them over too.
4D chess or something…

 
Yoricks Wisdom said:
lol my sister went on a rant about 'our global reputation' or some other rot. 'The world hates us now!"

my lady friend at the gym refused to go on her yearly Euro vacay because she's 'ashamed of being American.'

puhleeze. most of the world has never like America IMO. Europe especially. 'fat americans in shorts wanting ketchup for
their pomme frites!'

America is regarded as the 'world's bitch' with tons of money on the offer for nebulous, oftentimes nefarious, causes.
'what about child vaccinations in Africa? that's surely in our interest to provide...remind me why.

Why is the richest, most powerful empire on planet earth somehow obligated to bail out less ambitious, dedicated countries?

I'll wait.
Click to expand...
I answered it in my post, but our work to these countries brings direct economic benefit to the US—it helps us grow our exports. The result of helping impoverished nations become upwardly mobile is that they’ll have more disposable income, and they will spend it with us because of the help we provided and relationship we built.
 
BFoe said:
I answered it in my post, but our work to these countries brings direct economic benefit to the US—it helps us grow our exports. The result of helping impoverished nations become upwardly mobile is that they’ll have more disposable income, and they will spend it with us because of the help we provided and relationship we built.
Click to expand...
I’ll allow it.
The problem is that some impoverished nations are ruled by unscrupulous crooked despots who will seize and squander whatever money their country receives.
Without criticizing the agency directly for mismanagement and ineptitude, is it possible for the allocating of these huge sums of money be done by Financial clinicians with a certain level of circumspection?
 
Lycandroid said:
Drag shows in 3rd world countries are super necessary I will give you guys that.
Click to expand...
It’s funny all the crazy things DOGE cut not one person that was running those crazy things came back said it wasn’t true ..

 
Yoricks Wisdom said:
I’ll allow it.
The problem is that some impoverished nations are ruled by unscrupulous crooked despots who will seize and squander whatever money their country receives.
Without criticizing the agency directly for mismanagement and ineptitude, is it possible for the allocating of these huge sums of money be done by Financial clinicians with a certain level of circumspection?
Click to expand...
It isn't true anyway, that's some press release nonsense for the regime change slush fund. They claim that exports to shithole countries increase, but they only increase because US taxpayers are paying for it, and the imports they actually pay for when they get more money are from China, just like everybody else. Africa's total imports from the US are like $32B, and imports from China are $173B, and most of the US imports are paid for by you and I through this money laundering slush fund that sends more gay porn and cultural shit than food.
 
James Bomb said:
This sort of “politics as reality TV” YouTube content is just so tiresome
Click to expand...
The major difference is MSMedia doesn't get to put their spin on it Until After the info and those involved is put out to the public.

"Follow The Money" was ALWAYS hidden by Congress (ex. "retracted in the interest of National Security") - DOGE has given transparency by allowing the President to put an end to hidden recipients of stolen taxpayer money, Regardless of the scumbags involved.
 
Yoricks Wisdom said:
I’ll allow it.
The problem is that some impoverished nations are ruled by unscrupulous crooked despots who will seize and squander whatever money their country receives.
Without criticizing the agency directly for mismanagement and ineptitude, is it possible for the allocating of these huge sums of money be done by Financial clinicians with a certain level of circumspection?
Click to expand...
Sure, I wouldn’t have any issue with more oversight on agencies to make sure organizations spend money as they should. I’ll tell you what though, when Trump closed USAID he did it so suddenly that $500,000,000 worth of food spoiled and went to waste. I haven’t seen any evidence that USAID was nearly as wasteful as that.
 
Snubnoze707 said:
LOL @ writing it out "US AID"....

It's a CIA cutout money laundering regime change organization and it can Rest in Piss.
Click to expand...

One minimal chunk of Stolen Taxpayer funds was "Congress Approved" ($2 Billion) given away to Stacy Adams from the "EPA" for her $100 dollar donation sent in with Form 990 from Buyden's "Inflation Reduction Act", took her $100 investment only 3 weeks to pay off.

That was just a drop in the bucket, do the math seen in the 1st minute.

 
Last edited:
Yoricks Wisdom said:
'what about child vaccinations in Africa? that's surely in our interest to provide...remind me why.

Why is the richest, most powerful empire on planet earth somehow obligated to bail out less ambitious, dedicated countries?

I'll wait.
Click to expand...
If anyone can, we can. Is humanitarian effort not something that should be encouraged and praised? I'd be interested in the reaction you'd get by telling people in a poor African village about how unambitious and dedicated they are. In all countries - even the US - the citizens are different than the government. Just because a country is doing what we would call poorly doesn't mean the people are fully onboard with the situation. Why shouldn't we want to help people? Because of some arbitrary decision that they don't "deserve" aid? I would never consider myself a socialist or communist because I don't think that wealth is inherently evil, but people getting things even if they didn't work as hard as you really shouldn't be an issue. It's a personal feeling problem at least. I'm not saying people living on welfare should be given a Ferrari, but in this specific thread we're talking about humanitarian aid lol. We're not pushing TVs on parachutes out of cargo planes.

Seems like a stereotypical right-leaning "fuck you, I dont care, I got mine" mentality to me {<shrug}
 
GrantB13 said:
If anyone can, we can. Is humanitarian effort not something that should be encouraged and praised? I'd be interested in the reaction you'd get by telling people in a poor African village about how unambitious and dedicated they are. In all countries - even the US - the citizens are different than the government. Just because a country is doing what we would call poorly doesn't mean the people are fully onboard with the situation. Why shouldn't we want to help people? Because of some arbitrary decision that they don't "deserve" aid? I would never consider myself a socialist or communist because I don't think that wealth is inherently evil, but people getting things even if they didn't work as hard as you really shouldn't be an issue. It's a personal feeling problem at least. I'm not saying people living on welfare should be given a Ferrari, but in this specific thread we're talking about humanitarian aid lol. We're not pushing TVs on parachutes out of cargo planes.

Seems like a stereotypical right-leaning "fuck you, I dont care, I got mine" mentality to me {<shrug}
Click to expand...
lol, not really.
*but why you so mad gif
unwarranted personal attacks always undermine one's point, assuming they have one.
smarten up, amigo
 
Yoricks Wisdom said:
lol my sister went on a rant about 'our global reputation' or some other rot. 'The world hates us now!"

my lady friend at the gym refused to go on her yearly Euro vacay because she's 'ashamed of being American.'

puhleeze. most of the world has never like America IMO. Europe especially. 'fat americans in shorts wanting ketchup for
their pomme frites!'

America is regarded as the 'world's bitch' with tons of money on the offer for nebulous, oftentimes nefarious, causes.
'what about child vaccinations in Africa? that's surely in our interest to provide...remind me why.

Why is the richest, most powerful empire on planet earth somehow obligated to bail out less ambitious, dedicated countries?

I'll wait.
Click to expand...
Because you control 30% of the worlds wealth with the worlds largest military..........

You dont keep 30% of the worlds wealth without your cartel operations.... oh i mean " policing "
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,955
Messages
58,330,783
Members
176,001
Latest member
batty

Share this page

Back
Top