Urine Trouble (Mueller Thread v. 16)

[bobgeese]

Bob, you have proven yourself both dishonest and delusional countless times.

Like how you never address why everyone lied about the meeting in Trump Towers.
If it is a nothing burger, why all the lying burgers.

There was absolutely nothing wrong with the Trump Tower meeting. It’s opposition research. Just like democrats paying for Russian propaganda in the Steel dossier.

It’s what they did with the dossier and the fisa court that makes it a scandal.


I’ve been wrong maybe 7 times in the whole time I’ve posted here.

 

[Darkballs]

You need to check your timeline son, they started spying on trumps campaign BEFORE the Australian communicated with the US.

So they tried to entrap them on a crime that they didn't prosecute for, before they investigated them into crimes they did prosecute them for. Stunning bob.

 

[Joe]

 

[bobgeese]

So they tried to entrap them on a crime that they didn't prosecute for, before they investigated them into crimes they did prosecute them for. Stunning bob.

What is stunning is how you can twist my fairly simple statement, into that ridiculous nonsense.


The government repeatedly attempted to place illegal material into the hands of a member of the trump campaign.

Address that sentence and that sentence only. There is undeniable evidence that there was corruption in the leadership of the fbi and doj under the obama administration.

 

[bobgeese]

Except all of those with the exception of uranium one is a separate, verified example of misconduct under the obama administration (with the clause of if they listened to anyone but Manafort).

Remember, lots of these folks are now unemployed.

 

[Darkballs]

What is stunning is how you can twist my fairly simple statement, into that ridiculous nonsense.

Well that's what you said. You said they entrapped them. I asked for what crime. You said for "possessing stolen property." I told you that no one had been charged with that, so entrapment did not apply. You then whined about potential entrapment, to which you never proved nor explained why anyone should give a shit.

The government repeatedly attempted to place illegal material into the hands of a member of the trump campaign.

Address that sentence and that sentence only. There is undeniable evidence that there was corruption in the leadership of the fbi and doj under the obama administration.

No they didn't. They conducted a lawful investigation that resulted in criminal charges. Concise enough for you?

 

[bobgeese]

No they didn't. They conducted a lawful investigation that resulted in criminal charges. Concise enough for you?

So you’re defending attempts to set up a political opponent by abusing the powers of multiple agencies of the federal government.


I’m not surprised.


Btw, I hope you’re not pissed if trump uses some of these tactics on his opponents in 20.


Oh, and PS, he still won, and he won’t be removed from office.

 

[Darkballs]

There was absolutely nothing wrong with the Trump Tower meeting. It’s opposition research.

Then why does everyone at the meeting keep lying about who was there and what was discussed? And it wasn't opposition research. That isn't even the bullshit excuse the administration was making. They claim that the meeting was to discuss Russian adoptions and how they relate to sanctions.

At least use the correct lie.

 

[Darkballs]

So you’re defending attempts to set up a political opponent by abusing the powers of multiple agencies of the federal government.

No. I don't think they set him up for anything because he was never charged with anything. I think they conducted a lawful investigation that was founded on actionable intelligence and has resulted to date in over 16 people being charged on 100's a counts and some pleading guilty.


We can do this all day bob. You can keep calling it abuse, but when you fail to actually define the abuse, other than entrapping him into committing a crime that no one other than you claims he committed, you've failed.

 

[Darkballs]

dbl

 

[SBJJ]

Well that's what you said. You said they entrapped them. I asked for what crime. You said for "possessing stolen property." I told you that no one had been charged with that, so entrapment did not apply. You then whined about potential entrapment, to which you never proved nor explained why anyone should give a shit.



No they didn't. They conducted a lawful investigation that resulted in criminal charges. Concise enough for you?

When did this lawful investigation start?

And if it's so lawful why the need to keep everything secret and out of the hands of the committees who's job it is to have oversight

 

[bobgeese]

Then why does everyone at the meeting keep lying about who was there and what was discussed? And it wasn't opposition research. That isn't even the bullshit excuse the administration was making. They claim that the meeting was to discuss Russian adoptions and how they relate to sanctions.

At least use the correct lie.

Because they’re amateur politicians.


It absolutely was oppo research and they should just own it. They’ll learn. They’ve got several more years in power.

 

[SBJJ]

I'm loving the narrative of there was no spying but we MUST keep the name secret of the NOT spy because agents may die

 

[bobgeese]

Nothing to see here folks, just more coincidences...

 

[Darkballs]

Because they’re amateur politicians.


It absolutely was oppo research and they should just own it. They’ll learn. They’ve got several more years in power.

So they were doing lawful opposition research, but decided to commit perjury to hide it, and your defense is that they're amateur politicians. Well, we'll see how that holds up in court.

 

[Darkballs]

I'm loving the narrative of there was no spying but we MUST keep the name secret of the NOT spy because agents may die

Yeah. Law enforcement and intelligence agencies love to disclose sources unnecessarily. Them failing to disclose him (and it's already out in the media) is the real scandal here.

 

[Darkballs]

Nothing to see here folks, just more coincidences...

Holy shit. You mean to tell me that the political insider that law enforcement used was present at a speaking event 8 years earlier that was also attended by a Clinton doner? You've cracked the case.

 

[SBJJ]

No. I don't think they set him up for anything because he was never charged with anything. I think they conducted a lawful investigation that was founded on actionable intelligence and has resulted to date in over 16 people being charged on 100's a counts and some pleading guilty.


We can do this all day bob. You can keep calling it abuse, but when you fail to actually define the abuse, other than entrapping him into committing a crime that no one other than you claims he committed, you've failed.

So in your head using intelligence agencies to spy or attempt to spy on an opposition campaign BEFORE an investigation is not abuse

 

[SBJJ]

Yeah. Law enforcement and intelligence agencies love to disclose sources unnecessarily. Them failing to disclose him (and it's already out in the media) is the real scandal here.

But if he's not a spy why will agents possibly die if his names released

Also, there may be more than 1 spy

 

[D3thr0n3d K1ng]

Because they’re amateur politicians.


It absolutely was oppo research and they should just own it. They’ll learn. They’ve got several more years in power.

<Lmaoo><Lmaoo><Lmaoo>

If only you could have been at that meeting to coach them bobby.