Huge if true.
I'm fine with investigations justified by intelligence that warrants them. Official start dates to an investigation is some legal fiction that means nothing to me or our justice system.
And when they do so under oath, they've broken the law.
Nice to throw in a "but hilary" every once in awhile. Doesn't have anything to do with this, but you gotta stay in practice.
No. I remember when Trump said that Obama tapped his phones, and we all laughed at that because it was retarded. No one ever claimed that there wasn't an investigation into the trump campaign, that could include, surveillance.
No. I remember when trumptards tried to say that the DNC paying for a copy of the Steele Dossier was a big scandal, people reminded them that the dossier was compiled by, and first paid for by, Republicans.
No. I remember when we said it would amount to jack shit, and have been proven right.
No. Call it spying all you want, but there was clearly enough actual intelligence to warrant an investigation. Proven, by the fact that this investigation has borne fruit that you have denied and swore would never happen every step of the way.
You aren't worried about actual criminal conduct, even that which people have pled guilty to, dismissing it all as "all politicians lie" or some other cheap equivocation. The goal of this shitty spying and entrapment argument you're peddling is to undermine an investigation that you know will damage your partisan beliefs. The same way you tried with Unmaskgate, Mueller's a secret democrat, the steel dossier was in the warrant request, and countless other nothingburgers that never address the subject of the investigation. You only pray it goes away.
