Urine Trouble (Mueller Thread v. 16)

[Quequeg]

Only if the trump campaign didn't know the contents, which would be impossible. So no. The evil NSA didn't trick them bob. They were big boys, and they knew what they were doing.

Of course, that being what you allege is true, which it won't be. We can do an IP bet on that if you want. It would be great to never have you post bullshit here again.

Bobby blames law enforcement for Trump hiring known crooks(Manafort) that is the intellect we are dealing with here.

 

[bobgeese]

Bobby blames law enforcement for Trump hiring known crooks(Manafort) that is the intellect we are dealing with here.

I actually said it was a valid criticism of trump as an amateur politician to hire PM.


Feel free to continue embarrassing yourself though.

 

[ShadowRun]

“Senator Ron Johnson letter to the FBI regarding Steele dossier. Explosive new e-mails show FBI brass discussed dossier briefing details with CNN. FBI has a hell of a lot of explaining to do”

 

[MASShole]

TV said the state charges can't be pardoned. I doubt a guy who was treated badly by Chump would serve prison time in lieu of ratting Chump out.

Only federal charges can be pardoned, I think. Big reason why the district of NY is scaring the administration.

 

[waiguoren]

all the Trumptards are arguing the investigation should be ended on a technicality before it is even finished, what are they so afraid of?

Trumptards like longtime Clinton advisor Mark Penn?

Why not? Trump himself was a Clinton friend- advisor at one time.

"Longtime Democrat and Clinton advisor Mark Penn is a Trumptard"--- @Quequeg

You completely invented a quote for me, other than that, no problem

Seems like a fair representation of what you wrote.

 

[Darkballs]

How would the trump campaign know the contents?

Well bob, how would they have not known the contents at the time they set up the alleged legal act? They would have had to read it, see that it was dirt on hilary (or the promise of dirt) in order to be entrapped into using it. It always amazes me how you never understand the own argument your propaganda is making.

However if you want to bet on Trump being removed from office for anything to do with Russia, I’m down.

Well that wouldn't be dependent on law enforcement, but Congress. To take your bet I would have to have faith that in light of evidence of impeachable offenses, that Congress would act honorably. I have no such faith.

 

[Quequeg]

Seems like a fair representation of what you wrote.

Quote marks have a meaning, retard, and it is not "fair representation".

 

[elfeliz]

how many indictments so far?

 

[Quequeg]

Seems like a fair representation of what you wrote.

BS, you are a coward just like Trump who never takes responsibility for what you say.

 

[waiguoren]

Quote marks have a meaning, retard, and it is not "fair representation".

BS, you are a coward just like Trump who never takes responsibility for what you say.

I removed the quotation marks from the OP. The rest stays the same, as it is a fair representation of what you wrote.

Why the name calling? I wrote an accurate summary of your statements.

 

[HomerThompson]

False pretenses means shit. The police and there informants can lie and mislead when talking to suspect. What you meant to parrot, was that this amounted to entrapment. And there isn't anything close to that here.

Whats the argument? This one plant forced half the damn trump cabinet to set up various meetings in violation of the Logan Act, forced them to ask for and utilize information they knew was provided by foreign sources, and then forced them to lie about it numerous times under oath?

That is the worlds greatest case of entrapment there.

It's like that, but for dozen's of people. So nefarious.

 

[Quequeg]

I removed the quotation marks from the OP. The rest stays the same, as it is a fair representation of what you wrote.

Why the name-calling? I wrote an accurate summary of your statements.

Thanks

 

[waiguoren]

Thanks

You're welcome!

 

[SBJJ]

If as asserted by Bob Geese that Halper was a KNOWN spy then how could he meet under false pretenses? Btw meeting under false pretenses is not spying that is what an informant would do. Asking someone questions about the campaign that are illegal regardless of how that person poses as being is still being handed information willingly therefore it is not done in secret. How hard is this for you to understand. If I ask you a question and you give me an answer that is not a secret. I think if Halper was asked to sign an NDA/CA knowing that he was going to betray that NDA/CA then I think you might have some ground.

Just stop

If u came to my business as an employee asking me questions about my business but actually were working for a competing business. You would be a spy

 

[Strychnine]

You know how you don't get an informant placed into your presidential campaign?

Don't go around letting your staff have meetings with adversarial government agents in the building that has your name on it.

It ain't rocket surgery people. You roll the dice, you take what you get and all that comes with it.

 

[SBJJ]

You know how you don't get an informant placed into your presidential campaign?

Don't go around letting your staff have meetings with adversarial government agents in the building that has your name on it.

It ain't rocket surgery people. You roll the dice, you take what you get and all that comes with it.

Only the informant started before all of that. And even after surveillance on what, 7 members of the campaign, at least 1 or more spies. What do we have?

 

[Strychnine]

Only the informant started before all of that

Hmmm...

Perhaps because the target of the investigation was into some shady stuff from the get-go...

 

[Darkballs]

Just stop

If u came to my business as an employee asking me questions about my business but actually were working for a competing business. You would be a spy

And if that person reported evidence of criminal activity to law enforcement, how would you be protected under your spy claim?

 

[bobgeese]

Well bob, how would they have not known the contents at the time they set up the alleged legal act? They would have had to read it, see that it was dirt on hilary (or the promise of dirt) in order to be entrapped into using it. It always amazes me how you never understand the own argument your propaganda is making.

.

entrapment. n. in criminal law, the act of law enforcement officers or government agents inducing or encouraging a person to commit a crime when the potential criminal expresses a desire not to go ahead.


Mr Balls, above is the legal definition of entrapment.


The person (it’s claimed) made multiple attempts to get him to take the emails. That is literally the definition of entrapment.


Not to mention a gigantic political scandal.

 

[SBJJ]

And if that person reported evidence of criminal activity to law enforcement, how would you be protected under your spy claim?

Has nothing to do with it.

Would u want the FBI sending a spy into your life without ANY evidence of wrongdoing? Or without an actual investigation being started?

See, u only think it's ok because u hate the target