- Joined
- Jan 2, 2011
- Messages
- 8,299
- Reaction score
- 12,997
There is PLENTY of equivalence between food and addictive substances.You're arguing for a sin tax on food that poor people eat because it's cheap, not because it's bad for them. So, agree to disagree on that. There is no equivalence between food and addictive substances.
I don't agree that everyone has easy access to fresh food in as much as access includes having the money, having the time (both to shop and to prepare the meal), having a place to store it, and having room to stock up when it's cheap. Consequently, a lot of poor people buy some of the more nutritious foods when they're on sale. But what do they do between sales? You're looking at a lot of bread and hot dogs.
There are better ways to reshape (lol) people's diets without raising their cost of living. Here's one that just occurred to me now: how about a subscription service for low-income people to deliver baskets of fresh vegetables or the like paid for by savings in healthcare costs? If it were up to me the government would likewise put the food banks out of business.
Experts Agree: Sugar Might Be as Addictive as Cocaine

Is Sugar an Addictive Drug?
Sugar affects our brain pathways just like addictive drugs, and most of us don’t realize how much we’re eating. Learn more.
