They all are for the most part. Pagani's entire ethos is to be as ostentatious as possible. It's like a luxury watch with a grand complication that wows other car nerds due to its immaculate construction. But they can be toned down depending on color.
But why would anyone get a black supercar? It completely hides the lines and details. My friend's wife used to own the first gen v10 R8 and that is one hell of a car. Unfortunately, she got it in black and it looked homely and nondescript (for a supercar anyway). They have since sold it and now own a Golf R and a Tiguan.
Koenigseggs are just about the simplest shape you can build a sportscar. Just a wedge. They are visually not flashy at all.
In terms of flashiness and attention, something like the BMW i8 probably outshines these to the unaware. But then again, my dream car is a Lizard Green GT3RS.
Try the factory?
You will never see more Paganis in one place.
Maybe I am getting too old to appreciate popsicle colored cars...
The only R8 I would buy in term of color is black or silver. I plan to drive it regularly and seeing guys drive around Toronto in funky colored cars makes me chuckle.
It's not that I don't appreciate how wild they look, I just know from experience that I would get sick of the color mighty fast. On top of that, the R8 really doesn't have a lot of color options. I don't like them in red for some reason (maybe its the red Audi uses), the silver and black in my opinion look great. I've never seen a blue one (although I did see a yellow one a couple of weeks ago) and I'd rather take a punch to the head than own a white car.
The only car I can actually say I like in green is the Huracan but I can actually afford an R8 (with the same engine and platform) while the Huracan's are wildly overpriced.
Plus all the camo trim and alcantara in the interiors is pretty nasty. The new EVO, you can actually order an interior without alcantara.
And when did plush velour become a thing on interior car surfaces? Ugh... I'll take good quality leather every time.
Besides the black R8 will line up nicely beside my black F-Pace SVR
I would classify that as "not attractive" rather than outright ugly. It'd actually look decent if it was any other badge.I'm in the camp that thinks Hypercars aren't right for this topic, as by nature they are rarely "beautiful" at all, IMO.
Keeping with cars I've seen in person (as photos dont always capture the beauty, see: E-Type), my pick is the Mondial.
Just a concept right now, but hands down no contest Lambo Egoista
That things pretty fuggin cool IMO.
I’d paint it satin black and put a bat sign on the roof
The great thing about the R8 is they can be a practical winter car in Canada as long as theres clearance. Did you consider the 911 Turbo too? That flies even lower under the radar than an R8 if you want a lowkey sports car.
Their factory is tiny and they only work on a handful of cars at a time because it's all handbuilt. Dat bespoke craftsmanship...
I would classify that as "not attractive" rather than outright ugly. It'd actually look decent if it was any other badge.
And I would argue that most hypercars are attractive. It's just that the poorly designed ones are extremely gaudy and loud. But look at the holy trinity-
These are all instant classics.
Yeah but you were saying you didn't like flashy cars that drew attention. What gen was the model you had issues with?
Yeah, thats sexy. The regular Chiron looks great too.My vote goes to the Bugatti Veyron.
I never liked that far body style the car had. It also was overrated as shit.
But the new Bugatti Divo, tho...
...my my my, ohh
Yeah, that's ugly.Dendrobium D-1
But this is not. Aspark owl has sexy curves, and it seems to be the consensus that it's a great looking car.Aspark Owl
something looks really off with the Owl for me. I like the overall design but the it looks like the visibility would be absolute shit. might just be the angle but it looks way too long too which would be horrible for maneuvering
My vote goes to the Bugatti Veyron.
I never liked that far body style the car had. It also was overrated as shit.
But the new Bugatti Divo, tho...
...my my my, ohh
What do you think is the ugliest supercar? My vote is for the horrendously overstyled Lamborghini Veneno, whose price tag of 4 million dollars exacerbates its offensiveness.
This thing is uglier than the Aztek and I can't believe grown men with design degrees came up with this.
I also think the Veyron is one of the ugliest cars in recent memory. It was a landmark engineering achievement at the time so I am a bit more forgiving of its hideous features.
Its successor, the Chiron, addressed some of the grotesque faults of this car and is actually quite handsome.
And while not as ugly as the previous two examples, the Ferrari F50 deserves a mention here. Mostly because it's one of the holy grail Ferraris and followed the timeless beauty of the F40. Yet it still stands out as one of the ugliest Ferraris in history.
So what are your choices for ugliest supercar? Please limit your choices to actual production road-legal cars, not concept cars or track-only cars.
Yeah, I thought I'd throw the Aspark in to see what people thought; truth be told I'm in two minds about it. In matt black it looks like a Batmobile concept (i.e. cool as fuck), but as someone said earlier I'm not sure you could see out of the thing, also it looks like it has next to no ground clearance, and any road car which is wider than an Aventador is a bit daft (particularly where I live).
