- Joined
- Oct 7, 2007
- Messages
- 98,151
- Reaction score
- 172,555
Let me consult my Magic 8 BallTS, will you be able to make a decent thread this year?
Let me consult my Magic 8 BallTS, will you be able to make a decent thread this year?
I understood 100% of this postYuh passed marketing 101 good fi u fam all di best hope uni gwaan well maybe Drizzy pay off dem OSAP loan
Proud of u fam
![]()
I saw a very interesting video, in which this guy was able to convince people tap water tasted amazing by marketing it as $1,000 fancy water.
I think that fight fans are often times under a similar placebo effect due to marketing. A lot of fights put on by the UFC amongst contenders are actually quite bad if you remove the commentary, the walk-out, the promos, the hype, and just focus on nothing but the fight.
There are some very low level fights that are exciting and brutal but due to marketing people perceive it as less entertaining than title fights.
Do you think this is true? Are fight fans biased by the UFC when viewing how good a fight is?
FYI if you want to see the full video with the fancy water placebo effect:
I think if you remove the backstory, the hype, and the promos.
Low level fights are often times better than high level fights. I think you could even market and convince people that Covington is still a contender.
I remember a while back on the first round of "downed opponent" redefining, when a fighter almost got disqualified because he thought the downed fighter rule was that "3 points of contact" bullshit just cuz Joe Rogan kept repeating it on commentary, despite being incredibly wrong about it.Many UFC fans instantly take whatever Joe Rogan says as facts.
To be clear, this is not what the Placebo Effect means.
I saw a very interesting video, in which this guy was able to convince people tap water tasted amazing by marketing it as $1,000 fancy water.
I think that fight fans are often times under a similar placebo effect due to marketing. A lot of fights put on by the UFC amongst contenders are actually quite bad if you remove the commentary, the walk-out, the promos, the hype, and just focus on nothing but the fight.
There are some very low level fights that are exciting and brutal but due to marketing people perceive it as less entertaining than title fights.
Do you think this is true? Are fight fans biased by the UFC when viewing how good a fight is?
FYI if you want to see the full video with the fancy water placebo effect:
I think if you remove the backstory, the hype, and the promos.
Low level fights are often times better than high level fights. I think you could even market and convince people that Covington is still a contender.
I saw a very interesting video, in which this guy was able to convince people tap water tasted amazing by marketing it as $1,000 fancy water.
I think that fight fans are often times under a similar placebo effect due to marketing. A lot of fights put on by the UFC amongst contenders are actually quite bad if you remove the commentary, the walk-out, the promos, the hype, and just focus on nothing but the fight.
There are some very low level fights that are exciting and brutal but due to marketing people perceive it as less entertaining than title fights.
Do you think this is true? Are fight fans biased by the UFC when viewing how good a fight is?
FYI if you want to see the full video with the fancy water placebo effect:
I think if you remove the backstory, the hype, and the promos.
Low level fights are often times better than high level fights. I think you could even market and convince people that Covington is still a contender.
Thx fam you too Happy New Year stay blessI understood 100% of this post
Happy New Year, Sherbro!