http://www.bloodyelbow.com/2017/1/2...g-criteria-explained-hinds-bell-mma-interview
Interesting read especially this section in regard to the Lauzon fight:
"BE: Effectiveness and Dominance through grappling still seem to be widely misunderstood concepts. What are judges looking for when assigning credit to grappling?
Hinds: Agreed. The main reason for the misunderstanding is that people continue to evaluate actions instead of results. In a grappling scenario, positioning means the least when making an evaluation. This is a very hard concept for most to understand; especially when it comes to grappling artists that are used to “gaining points” for positional advantages.
All must keep in mind: It’s what is being accomplished to progress/finish the fight in that position as opposed to the position itself.
Example: A fighter with their opponent’s back (dominant position) that is doing nothing but holding a seat belt grip is going to weigh less than a fighter that is on bottom in full closed guard (neutral position) hurting his/her opponent with elbows and solid, (near) fight ending threatening submission attempts.
Judges should be always looking at the result of an action, not the action itself.
Judges should be looking for the same things in grappling that they look for in striking. Damage. The opportunity to finish the fight.
They should be evaluating (near) fight ending sequences such as: tight effective submissions, positions and transitions that have clearly diminished their opponent’s ability to compete, slams that have affected their opponents output and positional dominance that has rendered their opponent solely defensive with little to no offensive output.
Just hold a position has some weight, but not as much as people think when assessing an effective grappling round."
I think chaps we need to be going with the guy who has threatened from the bottom moving forward if the other person has just laid on them. Examples are Magny and Lauzon fights. I scored the fight for Magny but the other fight for Held. Let's hope it takes the books a few months to cotton on and let's get rich on live bet. I'm gonna imprint damage, dominance and duration into my mind.
In the same article the guy says r2 of tate holm should be 10-8 tate. can anyone remember that round?