Rockhold beating Weidman, Conor by dec in the Nate rematch, Conor over Aldo. Hes not gonna get everything right, but his insight is usually educatedLol no he's not
He called Werdum beating Cain, that's about it
As far as fighters go he's one of the most unknowledgeable I've come across. He's a fucking moron.
A few main event fights here and there sure. Being a huge Conor dickrider was probably the reason he picked him both times. He's def got more wrong than he has right.Rockhold beating Weidman, Conor by dec in the Nate rematch, Conor over Aldo. Hes not gonna get everything right, but his insight is usually educated
I remember he was on rory and i was huge on wb. Thats the only prediction ive heard him make.
Faber struggles when forced to stand you only need to watch his fight with fran rivera to see that. Rivera is a bull of a man im pretty sure faber cant get him down. Rivera is the better boxer faber will not win a three round standup battle. Hes talked about retirement loads isnt improving either and is he fighting for a pay cheque whats his motivation now? Rivera is young and hungry and should be improving fight to fight.
i mean, I'll give credit where it due, he was amongst the few who thought someone as smart as Conor had enough time to make adjustments and win a decision, and he was right. I'm a Conor dick rider and didn't make the same predictionA few main event fights here and there sure. Being a huge Conor dickrider was probably the reason he picked him both times. He's def got more wrong than he has right.
"Bro he's too smart, he spent 300k on this camp" isn't exactly solid reasoning. He made painfully obvious adjustments (throwing leg kicks against a Diaz and not gassing himself out in the first round) and still nearly got finished and barely won a decision.i mean, I'll give credit where it due, he was amongst the few who thought someone as smart as Conor had enough time to make adjustments and win a decision, and he was right. I'm a Conor dick rider and didn't make the same prediction
It wasn't outlandish no, but if you get multiple predictions on a card wrong and still rave about getting one right you're a twat.Shaa(r)up at least understands it's all about matchups. Calling Glover over Johnson wasn't outlandish, he always has some at least tangible logic behind his picks. That said, he's not as skilled as us, and tend to overvalue some things and forget about others. (Oh my god it's his hometown, etc)
Rivera impressed me the most against Munhoz. Still I'm having a hard time betting against Faber as a dog. I may look at the ITD.
I am with you and going fairly big on Rivera.I've just laid over 6 units on Rivera the line averages out @ -107. I really think this is a terrible fight for Faber and i feel very confident. I also stabbed Rivera decision but very small @ +175. I just cannot see Faber winning after struggling with Saenz and Fran Rivera. Not to mention three months ago he took a beating over 5 rounds at 37 and was hurt numerous times. Jimmie Rivera is a friggin beast.
No way to know. Gall could easily gas and then it could be a close sloppy decision lol. That's why I don't understand people going big on Gall round 1 at such shitty odds.I don't think it has been brought up, but I'm honestly curious of who has the better cardio between Gall and Punk.
I don't think it has been brought up, but I'm honestly curious of who has the better cardio between Gall and Punk.
I don't think it has been brought up, but I'm honestly curious of who has the better cardio between Gall and Punk.