U.S. report on Russian hacking released.

[ncordless]

So when Assange was swearing up and down that he didn't get the information from Russia, was he just unaware, or is he actually that deep in the pocket of Russia?

 

[IppoMakanuchi]

But this was supposed to be the proof to shut Donald Trump up!

All we get are reports of "Didn't you know RT is owned by the Russians!!!"

Pathetic!

No, not the Russians. Putin is their master. They don't shit without permission.

 

[Blackened]

Let's say it's true. That's espionage, plain and simple. Do you not think that's something that should be addressed somehow?

Fuck man. If I told the North Koreas that Kim Jong Un isn't a God, should something be done and that be addressed somehow?

Seems to me they did something patriotic, if indeed it was them. I think they deserve a medal (if it turns out to be them).

 

[ncordless]

But this was supposed to be the proof to shut Donald Trump up!

All we get are reports of "Didn't you know RT is owned by the Russians!!!"

Pathetic!

Dude. Even Trump has admitted that Russia hacked and tried to influence the election. Your troll tactics need a refresher.

 

[ncordless]

The report is a 10p. freshman book report on RT.com.


Is there a reason you are so quick to accept somebody's word for something without evidence? Are you not a little bewildered as to why they would release THIS report with such fanfare only to have it be a critique of RT.com?

You are blatantly misrepresenting the report.

 

[Anung Un Rama]

Wrong.

I know how you retards think.

The RT link is more than enough evidence to prove direct interference by Putin.

Not only that, there's undoubtedly more that they can't show.

There is no way the NSA, FBI and CIA put their name on this report without the evidence being overwhelming.

No fucking way.

Nice try. You just got exposed and now your flailing about trying to stay relevant to the discussion.

The RT link is not evidence of anything, let alone "direct interference by Putin".

The NSA, FBI, and CIA put their name on a book report I would have been embarrassed to submit in high school.

 

[Anung Un Rama]

Dude. Even Trump has admitted that Russia hacked and tried to influence the election. Your troll tactics need a refresher.

Source?

 

[JDragon]

I was positively surprised when I first heard this report was published. I expected them to give us more details (even if without naming individuals) for the process between the hack and the handover to Wikileaks.
Unfortunately it falls short. It still is a step forward - because 1) obviously it was recognized the original report was far from enough and 2) the Russian influence is obvious even if you disregard the DNC mails.

 

[ncordless]

Fuck man. If I told the North Koreas that Kim Jong Un isn't a God, should something be done and that be addressed somehow?

Seems to me they did something patriotic, if indeed it was them. I think they deserve a medal (if it turns out to be them).

I don't think you understand what "patriotism" means. For instance, just because you are obviously a Putin-loving shill who hates America, doesn't mean that you are patriotic for Russia.

 

[KONE]

Dude. Even Trump has admitted that Russia hacked and tried to influence the election. Your troll tactics need a refresher.

He said it was a possibility. This was addressed in the thread you're likely referencing on like the 3rd post.

 

[Blackened]

I don't think you understand what "patriotism" means. For instance, just because you are obviously a Putin-loving shill who hates America, doesn't mean that you are patriotic for Russia.

Dude. Even Trump has admitted that Russia hacked and tried to influence the election. Your troll tactics need a refresher.

Did you read the report? It said the Russian interference was RT... not any kind of hacking.

This is fucking pathetic. I already knew RT was owned by the Russians.

 

[Anung Un Rama]

You are blatantly misrepresenting the report.

No I am not.

First of all its closer to 15 pages than 25 pages due to blank pages, half-pages, pictures, and a gigantic YouTube graph, formatting.
Secondly, all but 2 pages are dedicated to RT. There is nothing substantial in this report at all.

 

[IDL]

If @IDL drew similar conclusions with the same level of evidence you guys would run a troll-train on him for pages.

Bozhe moi, the entire piece pins this entire conspiracy to RT, lol

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3254229-ICA-2017-01.html#

The thing I don't get is, there are a TON of influences that have vested interest in shaping public opinion. Even discounting the private globalist controlled MSM channels who obviously wanted Hillary, you have a ton of other foreign interests from Israel, to Saudi Arabia, to Iran, to China, etc. Even Canada!

The entire Russian narrative boils down to the one phishing scam and wikileaks dump of Podestas email

The amount of mileage that is being squeezed out of it is indicative of larger geo-political plays with that being used as cover.

 

[Blackened]

The thing I don't get is, there are a TON of influences that have vested interest in shaping public opinion. Even discounting the private globalist controlled MSM channels who obviously wanted Hillary, you have a ton of other foreign interests from Israel, to Saudi Arabia, to Iran, to China, etc.

The entire Russian narrative boils down to the one phishing scam and wikileaks dump of Podestas email

The amount of mileage that is being squeezed out of it is indicative of larger geo-political plays with that being used as cover.

It's fucking pathetic.

How anyone could not think there was some kind of globalist conspiracy at this point is beyond me!

 

[Limbo Pete]

So when Assange was swearing up and down that he didn't get the information from Russia, was he just unaware, or is he actually that deep in the pocket of Russia?

We really oughtta just take his word for it, apparently

 

[Grenz]

Fuck man. If I told the North Koreas that Kim Jong Un isn't a God, should something be done and that be addressed somehow?

Seems to me they did something patriotic, if indeed it was them. I think they deserve a medal (if it turns out to be them).

C'mon man, comparing North Korea to the DNC is a blatantly false equivalence.

Russia - again if this is all true - isn't some knight in shining armor for US democracy. Do you really believe that a country that's essentially a dictatorship cares about the integrity of a foreign democratic process?

 

[IDL]

It's fucking pathetic.

How anyone could not think there was some kind of globalist conspiracy at this point is beyond me!

I'm just curious what the game plan is here. What this political capital and manufacturing of consent is going to be spent on (besides undermining Trump)

 

[Blackened]

I was positively surprised when I first heard this report was published. I expected them to give us more details (even if without naming individuals) for the process between the hack and the handover to Wikileaks.
Unfortunately it falls short. It still is a step forward - because 1) obviously it was recognized the original report was far from enough and 2) the Russian influence is obvious even if you disregard the DNC mails.

Dude, they said the Russian interference was RT! Not any kind of hacking! Sad!

Big fucking surprise! What about the collusion between CNN and the Clinton campaign?

 

[Pale Man In Black]

What a joke.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

1) We dont know what evidence the intelligence community is relying on. The report hints at it, but they are not going to give up classified info.

2) Is there a reason we should think the conclusions of IDL are on par with the conclusions of the CIA, FBI, and NSA? Do they have all have similar expertise and/or access to privileged information? Are you able to distinguish between a CT nutter on sherdog and the US intelligence community?

1. Then they shouldn't expect people to believe them if they can't provide the evidence. Maybe it's time to just go ahead and do whatever people think should be done in response. Which is what exactly? Expel the diplomats and wag our national finger sufficient or is there more to come?

2. @IDL isn't a proven liar like James Clapper. Since he's still got a job I've little faith he's an anomaly.