Tybura vs Aspinall on ESPN+ PBP

I'd score that one for Marcos. Nice damaging strikes that round. Stepping front elbow in particular was very nice.
1-1 is how I'd score it, but there is a chance that Grant has some hometown advantage/lean from the judges too.
Lmaooooo
 
Holy shit...

What a robbery, and it was in Grant's hometown... Wow.
im not trying to be mr disagreeable. but should you reward volume or clean damage?

Yeah he kept pushing the pace, but his kicks were being blocked and he was missing a lot, felt like Davey was trying to deceive the judges by throwing enough shit in the wall to make it look like he was winning but Marcis had the cleaner poise and hit the cleaner head shots. and it shows in Grants face.
 
I kinda like Culibao for this one. Light bet for now.
 
im not trying to be mr disagreeable. but should you reward volume or clean damage?

Yeah he kept pushing the pace, but his kicks were being blocked and he was missing a lot, felt like Davey was trying to deceive the judges by throwing enough shit in the wall to make it look like he was winning but Marcis had the cleaner poise and hit the cleaner head shots. and it shows in Grants face.

I'd buy that for rd 2 maybe. I could see 29-28 Grant for sure. Rds 1 and 3 though, not only did he throw and land more...he landed better.

Just not sure how you give that to Marcos. Not that Grant did anything noteworthy either but Marcos was SO inactive outside rd 2.
 
1-0 Murphy. Probably. Striking was pretty close, but I think Murphy landed the slightly more damaging strikes and he also had the advantage in control time.
He's also chopping up that lead leg nicely.
 
im not trying to be mr disagreeable. but should you reward volume or clean damage?

Yeah he kept pushing the pace, but his kicks were being blocked and he was missing a lot, felt like Davey was trying to deceive the judges by throwing enough shit in the wall to make it look like he was winning but Marcis had the cleaner poise and hit the cleaner head shots. and it shows in Grants face.
Marcos hit Grant well one time on the nose which caused a cut. Should you reward a guy for landing one good punch? Total bs decision. The damage criteria is bs too. Bleeding does not necesarily mean damage.
 
I think I'd actually score that one for Culibao. The striking was pretty even until right before the takedown. Culibao rocked Murphy and had him chicken dancing. Great control time for Murphy with the back take, but didn't do nearly enough with it to balance out the rocking.
1-1 is how I'd score it. Could easily be 2-0 Murphy.
 
Well that was odd. Guessing that Culibao is pretty badly injured. Murphy's got this!
 
Doing great in my bets bet the over 2.5 and I need the over 2.5 and ziam in my no chance parlay
 
Grant losing is why I don't bet fights that I think go to a decision. I thought he pretty clearly won and I personally would've scored it 30-27, but he doesn't cement rounds and like someone else said, he plays up his point-fighting, which some judges hate. Judging is way too subjective to trust it imo.
 
im not trying to be mr disagreeable. but should you reward volume or clean damage?

Yeah he kept pushing the pace, but his kicks were being blocked and he was missing a lot, felt like Davey was trying to deceive the judges by throwing enough shit in the wall to make it look like he was winning but Marcis had the cleaner poise and hit the cleaner head shots. and it shows in Grants face.
So you reward someone that gets out struck all three rounds in a striking match because of a bloody nose? Wow lol
 
So you reward someone that gets out struck all three rounds in a striking match because of a bloody nose? Wow lol
hitting arm is not out struck. dont let the stats fool you. they get those ss wrong all the time. who is actually taking tally of those hits? a bunch of men in a room
Marcos hit Grant well one time on the nose which caused a cut. Should you reward a guy for landing one good punch? Total bs decision. The damage criteria is bs too. Bleeding does not necesarily mean damage.
Grant landed next to no punches, hitting the calf and his arm. while throwing wasted strikes is not enought. he also had swelling to his face
I'd buy that for rd 2 maybe. I could see 29-28 Grant for sure. Rds 1 and 3 though, not only did he throw and land more...he landed better.

Just not sure how you give that to Marcos. Not that Grant did anything noteworthy either but Marcos was SO inactive outside rd 2.
There were small miliseconds where marcos hit small jabs that most ppl will miss. Grant was playing the theatrics to fool you and the judges, they saw through that
 
hitting arm is not out struck. dont let the stats fool you. they get those ss wrong all the time. who is actually taking tally of those hits? a bunch of men in a room

Grant landed next to no punches, hitting the calf and his arm. while throwing wasted strikes is not enought. he also had swelling to his face

There were small miliseconds where marcos hit small jabs that most ppl will miss. Grant was playing the theatrics to fool you and the judges, they saw through that
Lol just stop.
 
Would give Ziam rd 1.
 
hitting arm is not out struck. dont let the stats fool you. they get those ss wrong all the time. who is actually taking tally of those hits? a bunch of men in a room

Grant landed next to no punches, hitting the calf and his arm. while throwing wasted strikes is not enought. he also had swelling to his face

There were small miliseconds where marcos hit small jabs that most ppl will miss. Grant was playing the theatrics to fool you and the judges, they saw through that
I would bet you media scores will disagree with you just like the numbers. Name the price.
 
Last edited:
hitting arm is not out struck. dont let the stats fool you. they get those ss wrong all the time. who is actually taking tally of those hits? a bunch of men in a room

Grant landed next to no punches, hitting the calf and his arm. while throwing wasted strikes is not enought. he also had swelling to his face

There were small miliseconds where marcos hit small jabs that most ppl will miss. Grant was playing the theatrics to fool you and the judges, they saw through that

He landed a few in rd 3 I agree. Not many in rd 1 at all. Still not enough to give him the decision all else taken into account.
 
Back
Top