Twitter is actually banning people posting the ‘NPC’ meme for “dehumanizing speech"

[KingSpider8]

The new “NPC” meme mocks leftists by depicting them as unthinking and reflexive automatons. The meme has upset the left so much that Twitter is now banning people posting it for “dehumanizing speech,” but its humble origins are the computer-controlled characters of limited intelligence found in most video games....

More here

Dehumanizing? Banning? Is this really where we want our culture headed?

I dunno, they are just memes after all.

Clearly these meme's are so dank and true that they have to be banned. it's too real

beep bop boop

 

[S Class]

Hah! How good is this?

Very well done, lol

 

[KingSpider8]

You ignored the point I made about individuals having the capacity to be racist. Mein Kampf is the sentiments of an individual.

That's a little much for some people here to grasp.

I spot two racists in this thread. Kill whitey

 

[MicroBrew]

I spot two racists in this thread. Kill whitey

Opposing White power = racist !

 

[Mookie]

But it's ok because they are a private company !!!!! They arent infringing on your first amendment rights!!!!

So much for monopolies!

 

[abiG]

LOL, this shit is hilarious:

 

[Brodels]

They are now banning black conservatives

 

[lifelessheap]

That's a little much for some people here to grasp.

Consult a dictionary and stop using incorrect definitions designed to push bullshit agendas.

 

[ObamaPhoneLady]

Racism has to have a power component . On an individual level a non-White can certainly be abusive to a White person motivated by racial bias and that would be racism, but on a national level , in the US it is not really possibly to be racist against Whites.

No it doesn't. The left added that rule in the last decade as a way of weaponizing racism accusations.

 

[MicroBrew]

No it doesn't. The left added that rule in the last decade as a way of weaponizing racism accusations.

Yes it does, when we are talking about societies and communities as a whole. Cause the group in power can not be oppressed by the group being suppressed, on a societal / national level.

 

[voxom]

Yes it does, when we are talking about societies and communities as a whole. Cause the group in power can not be oppressed by the group being suppressed, on a societal / national level.

no, it doesn't. what dictionary says racism needs to have a power component?

by your logic a japanese man can be racist in japan, hop on a plane without ever changing his views, and not be racist when he lands in america even thought he thinks exactly the same the day before.

 

[MicroBrew]

no, it doesn't. what dictionary says it needs to have a power component?

by your logic a japanese man can be racist in japan, hop on a plane without ever changing his views, and not be racist when he lands in america even thought he thinks exactly the same the day before.

You clearly did not read my posts, cause I made it pretty dam clear that on a national or societal level racism needs power to be racism BUT on an individual level a person from a minority community or community without power can be racist against an individual from the dominant community.

 

[MicroBrew]

PayPal bans Gab in wake of Pittsburgh mass shooting
https://www.engadget.com/2018/10/28/paypal-bans-gab-over-hate-speech/?yptr=yahoo

Internet giants are continuing their crackdown on hate speech following the anti-Semitic mass shooting in Pittsburgh. PayPal has banned the social network Gab, a known haven for hate speech, after reports revealed that the shooter was a frequent poster and had signaled his intentions shortly before the attack. While PayPal didn't provide an immediate reason for the ban in its message to Gab, the payment platform told The Verge in a statement that it didn't accept a site that was "explicitly allowing the perpetuation of hate, violence or discriminatory intolerance."

-
I have never been on this Gab social media platform, and never read anything about it. So whether it condones 'hate' I have no idea.

 

[voxom]

You clearly did not read my posts, cause I made it pretty dam clear that on a national or societal level racism needs power to be racism BUT on an individual level a person from a minority community or community without power can be racist against an individual from the dominant community.

the definition of the word "racism" doesn't change from a national level to an individual level


https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/racism

 

[The ScorpioN]

You clearly did not read my posts, cause I made it pretty dam clear that on a national or societal level racism needs power to be racism BUT on an individual level a person from a minority community or community without power can be racist against an individual from the dominant community.

What does this “national” level of racism entail? Minority immigrants do very well in an apparently nationally racist country.

 

[all caps]

PayPal bans Gab in wake of Pittsburgh mass shooting
https://www.engadget.com/2018/10/28/paypal-bans-gab-over-hate-speech/?yptr=yahoo

Internet giants are continuing their crackdown on hate speech following the anti-Semitic mass shooting in Pittsburgh. PayPal has banned the social network Gab, a known haven for hate speech, after reports revealed that the shooter was a frequent poster and had signaled his intentions shortly before the attack. While PayPal didn't provide an immediate reason for the ban in its message to Gab, the payment platform told The Verge in a statement that it didn't accept a site that was "explicitly allowing the perpetuation of hate, violence or discriminatory intolerance."

-
I have never been on this Gab social media platform, and never read anything about it. So whether it condones 'hate' I have no idea.

Pretty sure I spelled this out a while back when someone said "why dont they just make their own social media sites!!!"

Too bad no one cares.

 

[voxom]

What does this “national” level of racism entail? Minority immigrants do very well in an apparently nationally racist country.

apparently a national level of racism somehow involves having a black guy(the oppressed class) as the president of the country for 8 years.

 

[ObamaPhoneLady]

Yes it does, when we are talking about societies and communities as a whole. Cause the group in power can not be oppressed by the group being suppressed, on a societal / national level.

Racism and oppression are not synonyms.

 

[lifelessheap]

Hmmm, he could simply withhold his identity, then claim to be an illegal alien and his care would be free.

 

[lifelessheap]

apparently a national level of racism somehow involves having a black guy(the oppressed class) as the president of the country for 8 years.

The West is supposedly a racist hellhole, and yet it is being invaded by people of color by the tens of millions.